Spoiler Warning: There are spoilers ahead for Star Trek: Starfleet Academy. Spoilers are also present for the following Star Trek productions: Discovery, Picard, and Prodigy.
At time of writing, we’re just over five weeks away from the premiere of Star Trek: Starfleet Academy! Paramount/Skydance has begun ramping up the show’s marketing, with interviews, a new poster, and most recently, a new clip from the show. I thought we could take a look at those today, as well as look back at earlier trailers and teasers, and just talk a little about my thoughts, fears, and hopes for the Star Trek franchise’s newest series.
First of all… I still feel, based on what we’ve seen and heard since the Skydance takeover, that Starfleet Academy will be the final Star Trek series, at least for the foreseeable future. And unless it were to truly explode in popularity, storming the streaming charts to genuinely compete with the likes of Wednesday, Squid Game, and Stranger Things, I also feel increasingly confident that the two already-announced seasons will be all the show will get. This is not one of Skydance’s pet projects, and I get the impression that – as with Strange New Worlds – Star Trek’s new corporate overlords will fulfil their contractual obligations, but won’t pursue any kind of continuation for the series beyond what had already been lined up. I could be wrong – and I hope Starfleet Academy will prove such an overwhelming hit that it prompts a rethink in the Paramount-Skydance boardroom! But that’s where I feel the show, and the wider franchise, are at right now.
And from that negativity to… some more negativity. Sorry.
I… did not think very much of the new clip, to be blunt. Don’t get me wrong: there are some interesting things and some great acting performances, and it was wonderful to see the Doctor back in live-action for the first time. But there are also some pretty disappointing things to see, one of which ties into something I’ve been saying about Starfleet Academy since before the show was even officially announced: this didn’t need to be a serialised story with another galaxy-threatening, over-the-top villain.
Paul Giamatti is *fantastic.* I loved him in the miniseries John Adams a few years ago, and this is a man who’s won three Golden Globes, an Emmy, and been nominated for two Academy Awards. Giamatti was talking about Starfleet Academy at a recent promotional event, and he seems genuinely enthusiastic about Star Trek, recalling watching the show as a kid, and even talked positively about Deep Space Nine. Which makes it such a shame that, from everything I’ve seen of his performance in the previous trailer and now in the new clip, he seems flat, one-note, over-the-top to a totally unnecessary degree, and just… boring.
Star Trek *can* do great things with bad guys who get under your skin and really chew the scenery. Khan was like that, if you think about it, and yet fans adore both Space Seed and The Wrath of Khan to this day. But in this modern era, after we’ve had Discovery’s Klingons, the Control AI, the Zhat Vash, Osyraa and the Emerald Chain, various Borg Queens, the Diviner Vadic, Moll, and… whoever else I can’t call to mind right now, do we need *yet another* villain in that mould? After we’ve had so many “villain with a mysterious connection to a main character,” and “villain seeking revenge against Starfleet/a main character” storylines across the past decade… do we need to go down that road again?
To me, Starfleet Academy seemed like the perfect vehicle to do something different. The show would benefit, in my opinion, from following the Strange New Worlds style – leaning much more heavily on episodic storytelling, and leaving things like a main villain and galaxy-ending threats behind. Star Trek, in its prime, was the best kind of episodic television, and while there’s always been room for sequels, character growth, and ongoing story and character arcs… a show like Starfleet Academy, with its focus on a new generation of up-and-coming officers, just seems like it should be perfectly placed to bring back that style of storytelling.
Maybe, if Nus Braka didn’t seem so cartoonishly over-the-top, I’d be a bit less critical. And despite what I’ve said, I really will try to give the character – and Starfleet Academy – a fair shake in January. I’m not going to turn up for the show wanting to have a bad time, just so I can say “I knew it” later on. But when one of the things that had excited me the most about Starfleet Academy, before we knew anything else about the show, had been the casting of Paul Giamatti… I’m decidedly unimpressed with what I’ve seen from him so far.
If there’s more subtlety and nuance to the character of Nus Braka in Starfleet Academy, I will happily take back everything I’ve had to say about the character and the performance. And I’ve been wrong before – going into projects with low or no expectations only to be left genuinely impressed. Heck, I was not on board with the idea of re-casting Pike, Spock, and Number One for Discovery’s second season… and look how that turned out! So if I’m wrong, I’ll gladly hold up my hands and admit it. But… if I *am* wrong, and this character isn’t the one-note, scenery-chewing villain stereotype that he seems to be, it’ll leave me wondering why the clips and trailers were cut in such a way as to leave me with that impression!
The second performance from the recent clip that’s giving me pause is Gina Yashere’s. Yashere plays the role of Lura Throk – an interesting character on paper, as she’s half-Jem’Hadar, half-Klingon. But the way she delivered the couple of lines she had in the clip really just felt amateurish to me. I’m only familiar with Yashere’s work as a comedian; several of her stand-up specials were televised here in the UK, and she also appeared a few times on a comedy panel show called Mock the Week.
Lura Thok *looks* great – there’s some fantastic prosthetic makeup that’s really brought the character to life. And I’m genuinely intrigued at the possibility of learning more about the Jem’Hadar – and by extension the Dominion, perhaps – in this new 32nd Century era. But the way she delivered her lines left me incredibly wary and unconvinced; it felt like I was watching a fan film, when Lura Thok was in focus. Again, these are short moments, and the performance may come across way better in the finished product. But… this is Starfleet Academy’s big push, and the show should be putting its best foot forward to attract as wide of an audience as possible. Performances like that are not the way to do it.
After criticising those two performances, I find myself wrangling with Starfleet Academy’s status and its place in the franchise. When I’ve spoken about two other Star Trek projects in the past – Prodigy a few years ago and Scouts earlier in 2025 – I went out of my way to note that they’re productions aimed at a younger audience. That, by definition, changes how we approach them and where we might choose to be critical. In short, Prodigy and especially Scouts aren’t really being made for the likes of you and I – adult fans who’ve been Trekkies for a long time. They’re aimed at children, with a view to expanding the Star Trek franchise beyond its usual niche.
Is Starfleet Academy in the same camp? Or, to put it another way, am I being too harsh on the show already under the mistaken impression that, because it’s in live-action not animation, it should be held to the same standards as the likes of Strange New Worlds?
This gets to a deeper question, I guess. What’s the purpose of Starfleet Academy? Is it to give Trekkies and sometime fans of the Star Trek franchise another show to enjoy? Or is it aiming to attract a younger audience – tweens, teens, and young adults, the kinds of folks who’ve shown up in droves for the aforementioned Wednesday and Stranger Things? And if it’s the latter… should we be a bit more forgiving about some of the things we don’t like?
Some entertainment products which are supposedly made for kids or aimed at a younger audience end up going way beyond their target demographics. I have a neighbour who’s in his 80s, and in a random conversation with him he brought up that he’d watched and enjoyed Wednesday, having been a fan of The Addams Family decades earlier. And speaking for myself, I greatly enjoy some films and TV shows aimed at a younger audience: just this year I’ve watched and enjoyed Phineas and Ferb, for instance, and the film KPop Demon Hunters. So I don’t necessarily think that the argument “it’s for kids, dumbass” can or should be used to cover any and all flaws; there’s good and bad kids’ entertainment, just as there’s good and bad entertainment made for adults. But, at the same time, Starfleet Academy’s marketing material has shown me pretty clearly that, as someone in their 40s, I’m not really the target audience for a show about young adults at their equivalent of university. And I’m okay with that!
I want to judge Starfleet Academy as fairly as possible, and meet it where it is, on its own terms. This is something I’ve said before on multiple occasions – earlier this year, for instance, I wrote that Star Trek: Section 31 felt, to me, like a perfectly adequate B-movie; not great, not terrible, the kind of mindless action flick that’s the television equivalent of “easy listening” and that doesn’t demand much thought or attention. When I realised that I was watching a B-movie, I kind of went with it. While I get that there was a lot of disappointment in the fan community around Section 31, on its own terms, it was okay. Not the best thing I’ve ever seen the franchise put out… but in context, it was fine.
So… shouldn’t I try to be consistent and hold Starfleet Academy to that same standard?
Rather than judging Starfleet Academy by the standards of Picard and Strange New Worlds, I think – based on what I’ve seen so far – we need to compare it to something like… Dawson’s Creek or The O.C. It’s clearly being pitched to younger folks as a “teen drama” set in the Star Trek universe, not a Star Trek show which just happens to have young adult characters. And maybe that means we’ll get storylines about first loves, skipping class, overly-strict teachers, and all of the tropes that come with that kind of television. That isn’t usually my cup of tea… but I will try to keep that in mind when I talk about Starfleet Academy and the stories it aims to tell.
The recently-released poster also leaves that impression. I’ve seen some Trekkies online complaining about or criticising the poster – which depicts the cadets in a casual pose, lying on the grass, presumably in between classes! It evokes a kind of carefree schooldays feel, as if the characters are taking a break from their lessons and whatever personal conflicts or drama may be brewing.
Again, trying to keep in mind who Paramount-Skydance is trying to appeal to… I think that’s probably a good way to go. If the objective is for Starfleet Academy to be a teen drama first and a Star Trek show second, this kind of promo is *exactly* what I’d have suggested. It doesn’t mean we’ll get to see the poster recreated in the show itself, but rather the sensation or feeling that the designers and marketers wanted to create is one of carefree youth. Hopefully it’ll reach the right eyes and convince some new folks to tune in.
To get back to the latest clip, I’m glad we got to see the Doctor in action. Robert Picardo seems to have slid effortlessly back into the role, and I’m really keen to see what this new take on the character will look like. We’re catching up with the Doctor centuries after we last saw him, though I got the impression from a recent interview that *maybe* the Doctor’s holo-programme hasn’t been running continuously for all of that time. Don’t quote me on that, it’s as much a guess as a “theory,” at this stage!
Although the Doctor will clearly have some kind of role as an educator, the clip showed him back in action, tending to and potentially treating wounded cadets and Starfleet personnel after the attack on the USS Athena. Even if that’s the only time the Doctor plays that kind of role… I’m still glad to see it! As an artificial life-form, the Doctor should retain all of his knowledge and skills, even after all this time. I hope the Doctor’s role won’t just be a succession of short cameos, though. There are only ten episodes in the new season, and we’ve got a whole new cast of characters to meet and new storylines to follow. But if Star Trek is gonna do this – bring back another legacy character – they have to be handled with care, and given enough time in the spotlight to feel like they’re there for a purpose. Otherwise… it’s just a nostalgia play to get grumpy old gits to tune in for this new kids’ show!
We didn’t see very much of the cadets in the recent clip. A scene on the bridge with Captain Ake was interesting – and we’ve learned fairly recently that she’s a Lanthanite. The Lanthanites are a long-lived humanoid species, of which Pelia, from Strange New Worlds, is the only member we’ve met so far. I wonder if there’ll be a connection between them, or some kind of reference to Pelia in the new series.
Holly Hunter, the Academy Award-winner who plays Captain Ake, was far and away the standout performer in the recent clip. She seems to have perfectly brought to life this character who’s both a captain and a teacher, ancient and wise yet constantly surrounded by children. There wasn’t much of Pelia’s light-heartedness in Captain Ake’s characterisation, but that’s fine. I don’t think that, just because one member of a species acts a certain way, every subsequent character must do the same! I’m not sure how I feel about her choosing to wear glasses, though – but perhaps it’ll be explained that that’s a quirk she’s retained after centuries of life? I dunno.
I’m not *wild* about the design of the USS Athena. To be fair, I don’t think what I’ve seen of the exterior of the ship is atrocious, and it’s probably in line with other 32nd Century Starfleet designs that we saw in Discovery… but I wasn’t especially keen on those, either. Inside, the bridge still feels to me like a redress of the USS Discovery bridge set, rather than a totally original creation. Combined with an exterior that doesn’t feel all that special, the USS Athena just doesn’t strike me as being particularly memorable. When I think about some of the best starship designs, my mind goes to iconic vessels like the Excelsior-class, Galaxy-class, or Intrepid-class. All I can say is that I hope the Athena will grow on me over the course of the show.
One thing I did like, though, was the design of Braka’s ship. Three separate pieces seem able to break apart and come together. It reminded me of a cross between Booker’s ship, which we saw in Discovery, and the USS Prometheus from Voyager, which also had a three-part separation sequence. Perhaps there was also a dash of the Shrike – Vadic’s ship from Picard – thrown in there, too. Certainly a more memorable design than the Athena!
The callback to Discovery’s programmable matter was interesting – but I hope this will be developed a bit more in the new series. In Discovery, programmable matter was basically a glorified macguffin, used to fill holes in a few storylines but without ever really being explained. Star Trek’s technobabble has always been like that, but if programmable matter is as important to Starfleet in this era as it appeared in Discovery, and is going to be used by the villain of this story, I hope we get to look at it in a little more detail this time.
One thing I noted in the clip was that Caleb – the cadet we saw being rescued by Captain Ake, and who seems to have a mysterious connection to Nus Braka – didn’t know what this programmable matter attack was. Does that tell us something, perhaps, about his life prior to enlisting in Starfleet? I thought it was potentially interesting that, of all the cadets who could’ve filled that role, it was Caleb who was the one to get the “what is that?!” line. It could be nothing of consequence, though, if Starfleet Academy ends up following Caleb’s story more closely than those of the other cadets.
I think that’s everything I had in my notes for today.
This time last year, I said that I was sceptical about the Section 31 TV movie. I felt that it was targeting a younger audience, raised on action and superhero flicks, and that that kind of film might not be to my taste. But I tried to set appropriate expectations and gave the film as fair a shake as I could. I will endeavour to do the same for Starfleet Academy, which likewise feels like a project that may not be “my thing.”
I hope this has been interesting, and I hope I didn’t come across as too harsh, unfair, or overly negative. I really will try to be fair to Starfleet Academy when it premieres next month, and to go into the show with an open mind. Even if it is the kind of teen drama that I’m assuming, based on its marketing material, that doesn’t, by default, mean it will be unenjoyable! The clip may not have impressed me, and I do have some concerns about the show’s villain and a potential return to serialised storytelling. But I’m also crossing my fingers and hoping that – finally, belatedly – *this* will be the project to bring a new generation of fans to the Star Trek franchise.
In January, I plan to review Starfleet Academy’s premiere, which I think I’m right in saying will be two episodes. After that, I will make a decision about whether or not to review individual episodes or the season as a whole – that’s not something I want to commit to until I’ve got more of a feel for the show. But regardless, I will review Starfleet Academy in some form in the new year, so I really hope you’ll join me again for that.
And until then, I’ve still got a couple of other reviews from 2025 that I’m working on, and later in the month there’ll be my annual End-of-Year Awards, in which I’ll hand out some imaginary trophies and made-up statuettes to some of my favourite entertainment experiences of the year. Hope to see you for some of those!
Live Long and Propser, friends!
Star Trek: Starfleet Academy will premiere on the 15th of January 2026 on Paramount+ in countries and territories where the platform is available. Star Trek: Starfleet Academy is the copyright of the Skydance-Paramount corporation. This preview contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.
Trekking with Dennis 