Star Trek: Starfleet Academy – Series Premiere Review

A Star Trek-themed spoiler warning.

Spoiler Warning: There are spoilers ahead for Star Trek: Starfleet Academy. Spoilers are also present for the following Star Trek productions: Voyager, Discovery, Picard, Prodigy, and Strange New Worlds.

There was a time when the premiere of a brand-new Star Trek series would have been the most exciting thing I could’ve imagined. You don’t have to go back very far to see it, either: Strange New Worlds, which debuted in 2022, was somewhat soiled by the lack of an official broadcast here in the UK, but it was still an exciting moment. The same for Lower Decks in 2020. Picard, which premiered a few months before that, was probably my most-anticipated TV programme in years. Starfleet Academy, though… it wasn’t doing it for me.

The truth is that I arrived at the Starfleet Academy premiere with pretty low expectations. The show’s marketing campaign has been, in a word, lacklustre. A “teen drama” isn’t really my thing, with my teen years being so far behind me now that I can barely even see them over the horizon. And, after season upon season of modern Star Trek doing the whole serialised storytelling thing, I just feel pretty burned out on that. Some of that isn’t Starfleet Academy’s fault on its own… but it’s part of the conversation as we welcome the debut of the franchise’s eleventh show overall and ninth live-action series.

Photo from the Star Trek: Starfleet Academy premiere showing the main cast.
The main cast at the show’s premiere in January 2026.

I don’t sit down to watch *any* television show hoping to have a bad time. I genuinely want to give Starfleet Academy a chance to blow those low expectations out of the water, hook me in, and convince me that this has a shot at eclipsing Strange New Worlds to be the best thing the franchise has done in a long time. And I tried to go into the two-part premiere with an open mind – or as open a mind as possible, under the circumstances.

The long and short of it is that there are things Starfleet Academy did well, some areas where it was less competent, and a whole bunch of “teen drama” that I already knew I wouldn’t enjoy. I will go through the key points, but I don’t want to dwell for too long on the negatives, because I think there are moments that Trekkies will be able to enjoy – even if those moments are wrapped up in a narrative framework that isn’t necessarily going to be to everyone’s taste. I’m still hopeful that Starfleet Academy will be able to reach a younger audience; folks who might be more interested in the angst, crushes, petty rivalries, and schoolkid drama than you or I. The only way for Star Trek to survive is if the franchise can grow beyond its existing niche, and I really do want to see more Star Trek on our screens in the years to come. Starfleet Academy is intended to be a stepping-stone – an easy gateway for new, younger viewers to get started with what can be a dense, convoluted, and offputting franchise. There are tentative signs that Starfleet Academy may be able to achieve that objective, and I will certainly be crossing my fingers and hoping for its success.

Behind-the-scenes image from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Genesis (on a production monitor).
Behind-the-scenes shot of Bella Shepard as Genesis.

One thing I will compliment the writers, directors, and producers for is the length of the opening pair of episodes. I don’t know if this will be compensated for later in the season with shorter ones – and I hope not – but there’s no denying that Starfleet Academy got a meaty premiere. The two episodes together clocked in at almost two hours and ten minutes (sans credits), with the first part well over an hour long. That’s a decent length for a premiere, especially amongst today’s streaming TV shows with cut-down seasons and shortened episodes. There was enough time for the series to set up its main characters, introduce us to the cadets, instructors, and the season’s overarching antagonist, as well as set up two pretty different adventures for Caleb, Captain Ake, and the rest.

One thing I criticised Discovery for, after the show jumped forwards to this 32nd Century time period, was how it never really spent a lot of time considering the Burn – the massive, galaxy-changing event that led to the Federation’s ruin and the overall “post-apocalyptic” state of the galaxy. In just two episodes, I felt Starfleet Academy did at least as much as Discovery had done in three seasons with that premise, and the theme of rebuilding after a traumatic event was front-and-centre in a way it never was in that earlier show. Given the impact of the pandemic, wars, and other major events out here in the real world, there’s the potential for Starfleet Academy to do what Star Trek has always sought to do: examine real-world issues through the lens of science-fiction. The premiere made a start on that; time will tell if the rest of the season will continue those themes.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the Chancellor giving a speech to the cadets.
The re-opening of Starfleet Academy after the Burn.

The first two episodes of the season weren’t *as* heavily-serialised as I expected them to be, which is also a trend I’d very much like to see continue. We jumped from a story about Caleb, Captain Ake, and the villainous Nus Braka to one which focused on the Betazoids and their possible re-entry into the Federation. That change took us from an action-packed story to one that was much more focused on the subtleties of diplomacy. Both episodes kept plenty of “teen drama,” but they had different kinds of storylines at their core for those dramatic character moments to play out in front of. In that sense, I was quite pleased to see at least some effort to give the series a chance to explore different kinds of stories, different alien factions, and different characters.

That’s not to say that the show is as episodic as I’d have wanted it to be. Starfleet Academy has a pair of co-protagonists, really, in Captain Ake and Caleb, and the second episode of the season, in part, advanced their stories and the search for Caleb’s missing mother. In that sense, it’s not a “one-and-done” story that you could just pick up and watch without the context of the preceding episode – and I can only assume this trend will continue across much of the season.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Caleb and Captain Ake at the window.
Caleb and Captain Ake.

Star Trek, as a franchise with a focus on exploration, works better – in my opinion – when it has the freedom to explore new aliens, new locales, and new themes basically every week, and when a rotating cast of main characters each get turns in the spotlight. But I fully accept that that format *also* worked best when TV shows had the freedom to run to twenty-plus episodes per season instead of eight or ten. However, Strange New Worlds has managed to strike a pretty good balance, even if the show’s writers have a preference for certain characters over others, sometimes. A mix of episodic storytelling with ongoing themes and character arcs works so well in that show, and I’d have ideally liked Starfleet Academy to adopt a similar approach.

A show like Starfleet Academy would’ve been perfect for this episodic-plus-character-arcs style, too. Think about what the Academy is: it’s a school. The cadets are going to be attending a variety of classes with totally different focuses, and there can be field trips, missions, and more. And, in addition, to make the show accessible to newbies, an episodic style is the perfect introduction to Star Trek: an episodic show could give new viewers and younger folks an overview of Starfleet and Star Trek without delving too deeply into any one faction, alien race, or character. And from the 32nd Century, it would even be possible to look backwards at basically everything Star Trek has ever done – the perfect thing for this big anniversary year, too.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the 60th Anniversary logo.
2026 is Star Trek’s 60th anniversary year.

Speaking of Star Trek’s 60th anniversary, I liked the new introduction/logo that we got to see at the start of both episodes. Seeing the various hero ships from elsewhere in the franchise was cute, and it was a nice, subtle way to acknowledge this milestone year. It didn’t add a lot to Starfleet Academy in and of itself, but it didn’t go unnoticed or unappreciated by this old Trekkie.

The title sequence and theme music reminded me a lot of Picard, and perhaps Discovery to a lesser extent. I never thought I’d hear myself say this, but if *any* Star Trek show might’ve been able to get away with an Enterprise-style modern pop song for its opening credits… it would probably be Starfleet Academy! I’m not familiar enough with a lot of big-budget shows aimed at this demographic, but I wonder how the opening titles compare to something like Wednesday or Stranger Things. For my money, as a Trekkie, the opening theme felt fine. Perhaps a bit understated, but I didn’t dislike it. I’m also not sure if the title sequence is going to change every time, or whether the two different sequences we saw are just a result of one episode being the show’s overall premiere. In any case, I didn’t mind the change.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the opening title card.
The opening title card from Kids These Days.

Alright, let’s get into the weeds with both of the opening episodes.

A story about someone making a mistake, or being caught up in an institution that makes a mistake, and later seeking to atone for it can work pretty well. So as the setup for Captain Ake and Caleb’s stories, the whole “crime and punishment” thing that we got in the beginning had potential. But the way it was executed left a lot to be desired. First of all: “show, don’t tell.” Let us, as the audience, see Nus Braka and Caleb’s mother doing *something* together, even if it was just scavenging supplies from the crashed Federation ship. It would’ve been so much more impactful if we’d seen what these characters did first-hand instead of having it read out to us, dryly, in a pretty poor courtroom scene.

Then we have the length of this sequence. Putting Nus Braka and Caleb’s mother “on trial” together, when one is the instigator and one an unwilling accomplice, felt… rushed. As if the episode didn’t have time to give us two separate moments with these characters facing their punishments. I like the idea of this decrepit rump Federation resorting to excessively harsh punishments; it feels like a good way to indicate how far it had fallen and how tough the post-Burn era was. But the way we arrived at that moment wasn’t great, and it was utterly *dominated* by Paul Giamatti’s incredibly hammy over-the-top performance.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Nus Braka on trial.
Nus Braka at his trial.

Paul Giamatti’s casting was one of the main reasons why I felt there was even a scintilla of a chance for Starfleet Academy to be a decent series. I adored his performance in the John Adams miniseries a few years ago, and he’s been in a ton of wonderful films, including Saving Private Ryan and 12 Years A Slave, as well as TV shows like Billions. He’s an incredible actor, which is reflected in his many awards and nominations.

So it takes a perverse kind of “skill” on the part of writers, producers, and directors to get someone so great to turn in such a shockingly poor performance.

Nus Braka is everything I feared he’d be when I saw him in pre-release promos and marketing material. He’s a one-dimensional villain stereotype; a direct-to-video kids’ movie antagonist who wants to bulldoze the neighbourhood playground to build a car park. He’s so comically over-the-top that it ceases to be entertaining in its own right and just becomes ridiculous. And I absolutely despise that the modern Star Trek franchise can attract a performer of such genuine talent and calibre and reduce them to this… puddle of cold vomit.

Photo of Alex Kurtzman and Noga Landau at the Star Trek: Starfleet Academy premiere.
Co-showrunners and executive producers Alex Kurtzman and Noga Landau at the show’s premiere. Kurtzman also directed the opening two episodes.

While we’re on the subject of Nus Braka, Starfleet Academy broke a cardinal rule of storytelling that I fear will come back to haunt the series: don’t let your young, untrained heroes – before even *starting* their character arcs – defeat the villain in the first act. Sure, Nus Braka lives to fight another day… but only because Captain Ake inexplicably didn’t immediately recover (or just destroy) his escape pod. But when he inevitably returns to taunt Caleb and his friends again… we’ve already seen how easily he goes down. Caleb went toe-to-toe with him in a fight, and the cadets – who hadn’t even attended a single class, got to know each other’s strengths and weaknesses, or anything – were able to outsmart and outmanoeuvre his entire band of pirates.

Where are the stakes meant to come from when this season-long overarching antagonist comes back?

A couple of minor changes in the premiere episode could’ve seen Nus Braka departing the Athena, having dealt a blow to Caleb’s pride and the cadets’ morale – setting him up as a much more significant foe when he makes a return. Instead of having Caleb go toe-to-toe with him in a fight, we’d see Nus Braka get the upper hand, only to be forced into a retreat when Starfleet security is on the way. Instead of having the cadets work together to outsmart him, defeat his technology, and destroy his ship, keep the cadets working on smaller, but no less impactful problems, like the injury to Lura Thok. Have Braka and Captain Ake effectively come to a stalemate, with only the arrival of Starfleet reinforcements causing Braka and his pirates to withdraw. Starfleet reinforcements were discussed in the episode – why not make better use of them? It was far more important in this story, at this moment, to establish Nus Braka as a competent villain than to show Starfleet as weak.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Nus Braka's defeat.
“Nooooo!”

That kind of setup still gives Braka a pathway to feeling aggrieved by Caleb and the others, but it leaves him intact as a potentially intelligent, powerful, and dangerous foe. We’ve already seen his neck – how easy he is to beat, how he runs away when cornered, how he can be duped by something as basic as a fake alarm, and how he can be outsmarted by a group of untrained kids. How are we to take him seriously next time? A point made worse by the hammy, scenery-chewing performance.

I get that Starfleet Academy wanted to throw the kids into a difficult situation, but still give them a win – showing how they can come together and put their skills to good use when it matters. But again… this is our *first* introduction to these characters. They haven’t gone through anything, they barely know each other’s names… a victory like this needs to feel earned, and this one didn’t. Not to mention that all of the cadets were supposed to be in lockdown in their cabins, and that the Athena is a starship with its own crew. Where was the Doctor when Lura was injured? Where were… any crew members at all, come to that?

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Lura Thok and Sam.
Lura’s injury gave the cadets an opportunity to work together on a smaller-scale problem.

The kind of story we got in the premiere shouldn’t have come until at least halfway into the season. And if the producers and writers wanted an explosive beginning to the season, which tied into Caleb and Captain Ake’s stories, there were ways to set that up without giving the kids a win that felt… scripted. If everyone comes across as being too perfect on day one, able to solve the most complex of problems and defeat who we assume is still going to be the season’s main villain… where does the show go from there? How do you give characters an arc when they start from such a high point? It’s a challenge that the rest of the season will now have to overcome – and it didn’t need to be.

This highlights a trend that a lot of media made for kids can fall victim to: in order for the young’ins to be able to save the day, the adults around them – who are, in this case, in loco parentis – have to be shockingly incompetent. The bridge crew did basically nothing, save for triggering a pre-made training programme. It fell to Caleb and the other cadets to stop Braka and save the ship. And, in the next episode, it fell to Caleb again to provide all of the answers to solving the diplomatic crisis between Betazed and the Federation. The adults at Starfleet Academy just… aren’t up to the task, apparently.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the bridge.
Captain Ake arrives on the bridge.

There are a plethora of ways to show that a younger character is competent and able without having them save the day over and over again. We’re only two episodes in, and thanks to Captain Ake telling us over and over again how special and wonderful and magical Caleb is, and the demonstrable proof of that through Caleb’s technical skills, his engineering skills, his combat skills, and even his diplomatic skills… well, I’m getting “Wesley Crusher” vibes. Which, unfortunately, I can’t say I intend to be a compliment.

I would’ve liked to see a more nuanced take on Caleb. Instead of being able to hack computers with ease, fight off the season’s main villain, and save the day at the drop of a hat, I’d like to see the *potential* for him to one day be able to do those things – but to see that raw talent as rough and unguided. This would give the likes of Captain Ake a way in – a way to assume the role of mentor or teacher. Why does Caleb need a teacher? What can the Academy teach him that he doesn’t already know how to do? He’s willing to stay – for now – because Starfleet seems useful to him, and he can hack their computers from the comfort of his dorm room. But when a character starts the story at the level of an expert, it doesn’t leave a lot of room for growth.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Caleb.
There’s a risk in making a protagonist too perfect from the very start.

One area where we could potentially see more from Caleb – to give him more of a genuine arc beyond “find my mother” – is in making friends. Realising that he can work as part of a team, and then later, that he can work *better* as part of a team, is basically the only growth potential a character like Caleb can have, at this point. And I hope that the remainder of the season can show him working with the other cadets, as well as Tarima, Captain Ake, and others at the Academy, to undergo some kind of arc beyond the main narrative.

To return to Captain Ake, I have to repeat something I said a moment ago: “show, don’t tell.” Captain Ake repeatedly tells Caleb that she hasn’t stopped looking for him for fifteen years, but we saw absolutely none of that on screen. In fact, when we saw Captain Ake for ourselves, she seemed pretty settled on Bajor, playing with kids and enjoying an ice cream. Not exactly the desperate search that she swore up and down she’d never stopped nor given up on. It wasn’t the worst scene in the world, and I did like how it harkened back to Archer recruiting Hoshi in Enterprise, Janeway seeking Tom Paris’ help in Voyager, and other, similar moments.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Captain Ake at the end of the episode.
Captain Ake.

But at the same time, we’re following *this* story – the search for Caleb, Caleb’s mother, and Nus Braka. And Captain Ake tells Caleb – and by extension, us as the audience – repeatedly that she’s been searching for him ever since he ran away. But… the only scene we get of her in between Caleb’s escape and her accepting the role of Chancellor shows her with a bunch of children licking an ice cream cone. It’s just tonally jarring in a way that it didn’t need to be.

Let’s reimagine this moment.

One of the key themes that Starfleet Academy seems to be going for is that we’re all “better off together;” that one of the biggest strengths Starfleet and the Federation can offer is teamwork. So, instead of Admiral Vance finding Captain Ake chilling out with an ice cream, how about he finds her in some seedy bar on a dangerous Orion Syndicate planet, desperately chasing a long-dead lead. Vance could tell her that *Starfleet* found and rescued Caleb, demonstrating the show’s point about working as part of a diverse team, and a well-managed organisation having strengths and abilities that a “lone wolf” doesn’t. We get to the same place, but without the weird jump in tone and the kind-of-a-lie Captain Ake would later tell.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Admiral Vance and Captain Ake having ice cream.
Does this look like a woman consumed by her search for a missing kid?

See how we get to basically the same destination, but via a route more in keeping with the story?

Let’s stick with Captain Ake for now. I like the idea of using her run-in with Caleb and his mother to highlight the state of the galaxy after the Burn – and how the Federation in that era could do the wrong thing. There were pretty obvious parallels to the issue of family separation in the United States, where migrant parents and children have been separated, and where parents have been deported, leaving children who were citizens behind.

As I said above, using a sci-fi lens to examine this complex issue is a great idea, and that’s something Star Trek has always done – from the anti-nuclear message of The Doomsday Machine to the criticism of the way homelessness and mental health issues are handled in Past Tense. Captain Ake was put into an impossible position by Starfleet – though I wish we’d gotten to see a little more of that. She stated that she was the senior officer in charge of prosecuting Nus Braka, yet when she spoke to Caleb’s mother, she implied that her hands were tied when it came to enforcing the law and dishing out punishments. But… who tied her hands? Did she get orders from someone else in Starfleet? Seeing that moment for ourselves, and perhaps seeing her at least trying to argue back, recognising how wrong that decision felt to her, would have done a lot to inform her characterisation at this crucial moment.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Captain Ake in a flashback.
Why did Captain Ake feel she had no choice but to separate Caleb from his mother?

So far, I don’t think the show has made much of Captain Ake’s age or the fact that she’s a Lanthanite. We’ve met one other Lanthanite in Star Trek recently: Pelia, from Strange New Worlds. There’s plenty of time for the rest of the season to do more with the idea of Captain Ake being several hundred years old, and I hope it’ll come into play a bit more and have more of an impact on both the story and her characterisation. So far, I don’t really feel a lot of “ancient and wise” from her – though I would note that there are more than a few similarities with Pelia, which I did appreciate.

Whether Starfleet Academy does or doesn’t make more of Captain Ake’s age, though, it does call one thing into question for me: why have both an ancient Lanthanite captain *and* an ancient holographic Doctor in the same show? Don’t these two characters kind of occupy similar narrative spaces? Do we need two “Yoda” type characters in Starfleet Academy for the kids to turn to? I guess I’m just a little worried about one overwhelming the other, or how they’ll really distinguish themselves if they’re both gunning for that “wise mentor” space.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Captain Ake and the Doctor.
These two characters are both ancient and long-lived.

In my preview of Starfleet Academy, which I wrote based on the teaser trailers and clips that had been shown off last year, I said that Gina Yashere’s performance was of particular concern; I just wasn’t at all convinced by her acting from what I’d seen. Yashere had her moments as Lura Thok – the half-Jem’Hadar, half-Klingon XO and cadet master – in the two-part premiere, but she was far from perfect much of the time. Ironically, I felt her best performances came in what was probably one of the tougher acting challenges she had: when Thok was injured and being attended by the cadets, I felt the character was far more believable than at basically any other moment in the double-header.

I hope that Lura Thok will grow on me, and that my familiarity with the performer (and perhaps the accent, too) are part of what’s been throwing me off. I find the idea of a half-Jem’Hadar interesting, and there’s potential, perhaps, to catch up with the Dominion and see what came of Odo’s peace initiative. At the very least, I hope that Lura Thok isn’t just going to be a sidelined character, whose history and traits are played up for dramatic effect. Starfleet can have this kind of “drill sergeant” without them needing to be from such a background – and really, as Trekkies, don’t we want to know more about how a half-Klingon, half-Jem’Hadar came to be? Jem’Hadar were all artificially created in Deep Space Nine; I’d love to know more about them and what kind of culture they may have developed independently from their Founders. And how did someone who’s half-Jem’Hadar make their way to Starfleet? I have more questions than answers… and despite a shaky and inconsistent performance, I’m still keen to learn more about this character. As a DS9 fan, I really want to like Lura Thok!

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Lura Thok.
Lura Thok.

From one Klingon to another! Jay-Den Kraag is a genuinely interesting character, and I really enjoyed what he brought to the first episode in particular. There’s always going to be something interesting about a character who is – for want of a better term – “rebelling” against social expectations, so a Klingon doctor (or med student, technically) is a really fun idea. He reminds me a little of Dr Reyga – the Ferengi scientist from The Next Generation Season 6 episode Suspicions; a character who was defined by his desire to show that his people could be more than money-obsessed merchants.

As above with Lura Thok, I’m hopeful that Jay-Den can be a gateway to us learning more about his people in this era – something Discovery failed to show us. Some have speculated that the Klingons may have joined the Federation by this time; Jay-Den’s interactions with his fellow cadets and Lura Thok seem to suggest that there’s still a strong warrior culture amongst many Klingons. Those two things aren’t necessarily mutually-exclusive, of course, but if the Klingons aren’t Federation members, it raises the question of why (and how) Jay-Den is attending Starfleet Academy. I hope that’s something we’ll get to learn more about. His introduction was surprisingly cute; I liked his reluctant admission that he enjoys birdwatching, and again, the idea of a “softer” Klingon character has a ton of potential.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Jay-Den in uniform.
Jay-Den, the Klingon med student.

Darem is a potentially interesting character, as he introduces us to a brand-new alien race. But his introduction as an antagonist… it left a lot to be desired, quite honestly, and the whole “stuck-up rich kid who’s also a bully” character is a pretty tired cliché, even for a show set at a school. The upside to Darem’s poor introduction is that it does leave him with genuine space to grow – something I talked a lot about earlier. And we perhaps saw a few baby steps in that direction, with Darem risking his life for his shipmates.

There’s also potential in the “two kids who hate each other have to be roommates” trope, though we didn’t get much of that in the first couple of episodes. I’d like to think we’ll get some more one-on-one time with Darem and Caleb, though the introduction of a third roommate for them could complicate that a bit. Darem was the character I was least sure about going into the premiere; he seemed like he could be totally superfluous, seeming to share some aspects of his character bio with other cadets. But he emerged as a unique character in the series – even if his “rich kid bully” archetype is pretty tired when considering other “teen drama” type shows. I like the idea of a shape-shifting alien, and I wonder if we’ll learn more about these abilities in the future.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Caleb and Darem squaring up.
Squaring up for a fight.

We’ll pick up with the remaining cadets and crew in a moment, but I want to take a diversion to talk about CGI and animation.

In modern Star Trek, CGI has generally been pretty solid. There have been a few notable misfires, like the copy-and-paste fleets in Picard’s first season finale, and a digital sword in the third season of Discovery that looked weightless and fake, but I couldn’t call to mind many other examples of genuinely poor-looking CGI.

Until now.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Caleb, Tarima, and the whale.
Yikes.

The whale in the aquarium in Beta Test looked just *atrocious*. It looked like it was from a 2005-era video game, totally unrealistic, and genuinely detracted from that entire sequence. Other CGI in Starfleet Academy’s opening two episodes looked fine – establishing shots of the Academy, the USS Athena, the battle with Nus Braka’s ship, holograms and programmable matter interfaces… they all looked good enough. But that whale… Jesus Christ. I thought Paramount’s artists had begun to get better at using the AR wall, but I don’t think the wall itself was the issue. The model used for the whale was just too low resolution or low-poly to be at all realistic.

And I genuinely don’t understand how that could’ve happened. Not only was this a callback to The Voyage Home, but it was a pivotal moment in the episode, with Caleb showing Tarima something meaningful, reaching out to her, and showing us as the audience how the pair are potentially developing feelings for one another. The whale was a vital part of the scene, so for it to look so cheap, so outdated, so far behind the times, so low-res… it was utterly awful, and by far the worst-looking moment in the entire pair of episodes – and one of the worst-looking moments in Star Trek as a whole since Enterprise.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the whale.
Are those pixellated blobs meant to be… *bubbles*?

While other CGI in Starfleet Academy was pretty good, the 32nd Century’s overabundance of holographic displays can be a tad offputting, sometimes. And it probably isn’t easy for a performer to have to act on a blank stage, only for all of the holographic stuff to be added in post-production. Sometimes, parts of the Academy could just feel a little… cluttered, thanks to there being so many holographic signs and floating displays.

The design of the USS Athena… it’s something that I hope will grow on me as the show continues its run. It’s interesting that the ship’s basic layout is reflected in the kids’ combadges, and that feels like a cute little addition. And in principle, the idea of a ship that can be both a ground-based campus *and* take off and go to space is really neat. The opening two episodes showed us one space mission and one on Earth, and I hope we continue to get a good mix of both kinds of stories going forward.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the USS Athena.
The USS Athena.

The Athena continues a trend from Discovery of starships having a lot more diversity in their designs when compared to earlier iterations of Star Trek. I don’t hate that in principle, but we have to remember that one of the tasks Starfleet Academy has is to bring new, younger eyes to Star Trek for the first time. Establishing a firm visual identity for the franchise – ensuring that viewers can *immediately* tell that they’re watching Star Trek – is important, so I think I’d have picked a design for the Athena that was a little more… traditional.

The Athena’s introduction was – unlike the aforementioned whale – a very competently-constructed CGI sequence. But I’m afraid it was spoiled, at least for me, by being too cluttered. The Athena was shown off while surrounded by other starships and space stations, and it wasn’t easy to tell at a glance – or if you’re new to the franchise, perhaps – which parts were the Athena and which were something else. Compare the introduction of the Athena, or the Athena preparing to go to warp, with similar moments in The Motion Picture, The Next Generation, or Voyager to see what I mean. Those sequences did a much better job of highlighting the “hero” ship, and while modern CGI might’ve allowed artists to construct spacedocks that they felt looked larger and more believable… that realism actually detracted from the entire point of the sequence. Scenes like these need to highlight and show off the main starship, and all of the background clutter made that harder, not easier. It was a bit of an unnecessary own goal.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the USS Athena.
The Athena’s introduction was somewhat drowned out by background clutter.

Tarima could make for an interesting character, and I’ll be curious to see how she progresses. The idea of a Betazoid with some kind of medical condition that means their empathic abilities have to be dampened is potentially interesting, as long as the resolution to that mini-mystery is solid. Though I suspect it’ll turn out that she has some kind of “superpower” that the cadets will be able to use further along in the story to defeat a baddie or solve a problem. I’m also interested to learn more about this War College, and its seeming rivalry with the Academy – Tarima, as a War College enrollee, could be our point-of-view character for some of that.

The Betazoids made for a welcome addition to Starfleet Academy, though, and I did enjoy the presentation of the Betazoid leader, who communicated through sign language and telepathy, converted to speech via a translator. I think this is something we’ve seen hinted at before – that Betazoids, among themselves, prefer communicating telepathically. It makes sense to me at least that, after a century-plus of isolation, some Betazoids may have almost never spoken aloud, and may not possess the ability to do so. Plus, it’s always nice to see a bit of disability representation in Star Trek, with the franchise again showing it through a sci-fi lens. The same is true of the Betazoids and their “wall;” the theme of bringing down the wall and opening up to integration was another way Starfleet Academy passed comment on real-world events.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the president of Betazed.
The President of Betazed.

So far, I’m not feeling a ton of personality from Genesis. She seemed to have moments of politeness and friendliness – like her interactions with Sam and Jay-Den in the premiere – and moments where she might be either a bit more calculated or perhaps a bit jovial – as we saw when she caught Caleb sending his message. The daughter of an Admiral, who’s been training her whole life for the moment she could join Starfleet, could give her a bit more to say, and I hope we’ll get an episode where she’s more in focus. As it is, the opening pair of episodes have left her quite open, and there are many possible directions for her character across the season.

The same is true of Sam (or SAM? I’m going to write it in lowercase for now). The one thing I’d really like to learn from Sam is why her photonic civilisation felt the need to create a child and send her to school. And if they wanted to create a holographic child, why not start from a newborn age, or a toddler? Why create a 17-year-old and send her to school? Sam also opens up a pathway for us as the audience to connect with the Doctor in a new way, something we kind of glimpsed in the premiere, and she brings a bit of light-heartedness to various conversations and character groups with her wide-eyed “everything is so new and I’m fascinated by it” energy.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Sam.
Sam.

I’m glad that the Doctor didn’t overwhelm Starfleet Academy, as I’ve come to feel that an overreliance on legacy characters hasn’t been great for the franchise overall. Fans like you and I might be approaching this show as a sequel – the eleventh show in a line stretching back six decades. But for newcomers – the younger audience Starfleet Academy is meant to be reaching out to – a focus on returning characters and a massive dump of lore just… would be too much, I suspect. For me, the Doctor’s role in the show so far stuck more or less the right balance – more than a cameo, but not so much as to be overwhelming.

I was interested by the Doctor’s reaction to Sam, and particularly how he seemed reluctant to discuss the crews of Voyager and the Protostar (the latter being from Prodigy, which I still need to finish watching!) Perhaps the Doctor just didn’t want to talk about something like that with someone he’s just met, though I suspect there’s more to it. Could we learn that living such a long life, and seeing so many generations of organic friends live and die, takes a toll on an artificial life-form? That could be an interesting angle, and a way for the Doctor to get a more personal storyline.

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing the Doctor.
The Doctor.

This review is already running long, so let’s start to wrap things up.

Starfleet Academy is a show that I almost certainly wouldn’t have sat down to watch were it not for the “Star Trek” label. This style of show just isn’t my thing, and I knew that before a single frame had aired. But, for Trekkies, I think there are some green shoots and some reasons to be optimistic. I like how the series has taken Discovery’s post-Burn setting and done a lot more with it, I like at least some of the main characters, or at least I can see their potential. And I’m still hopeful that a show deliberately targeting a younger audience will help the fan community grow.

I will continue to watch the series, but I won’t be doing weekly episode reviews this year. Instead, I’ll write up my thoughts on the season as a whole when it’s over – which will be in mid-March. I may talk about the show in between now and then, for example if I have a theory to craft or if I have something to say about a character or plotline that just can’t wait! Such things have been known to happen around here!

Still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy Season 1 showing Caleb with an apple.
Caleb at the end of the two-parter.

I stand by what I’ve been saying over the past year or so: Starfleet Academy feels like it’s going to be the final Star Trek show to premiere for the foreseeable future. And unless it really does blow up and do exceptional numbers for Paramount+, I doubt it’ll continue beyond its already-produced second season. I really want the show to be enjoyable on a personal level, of course, but I think what’s even more important is that it reaches its intended audience – younger folks in the under-20 bracket, people who’ve enjoyed the likes of Wednesday and Stranger Things on Netflix, and fans of these kinds of high school/university dramas in general.

So that was Starfleet Academy’s premiere. I haven’t read any other reviews yet, so I don’t know if my thoughts on the show are the same as other fans and critics. But I hope that Trekkies and new viewers alike are finding their way to Starfleet Academy and giving it a fair shake.

Be sure to check back after the season finale in March to get my review of Season 1 as a whole. And in this big 60th anniversary year, I’m sure I’ll have more to say about this wonderful franchise! Live Long and Prosper, friends.


Star Trek: Starfleet Academy is available to stream now on Paramount+ in countries and territories where the service is available. The Star Trek franchise – including Starfleet Academy and everything else discussed above – remains the copyright of Paramount/Skydance. This review contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.

Star Trek: Scouts

It’s not every day that a brand-new Star Trek series premieres… let alone two! But to mark Star Trek Day yesterday (the 8th of September), Skydance/Paramount dropped the first episode of the Khan audio drama… and still had one more surprise in store.

Star Trek: Scouts is a series aimed at preschoolers. The first two episodes were released on YouTube yesterday, and I’m actually pleased to see Paramount doing something like this. As we’ll get into, I’m not sure the way Scouts has been launched is perfect, but as a concept, as a principle… this is the kind of move I think we need to see more of if Skydance and Paramount are serious about establishing Star Trek as a brand with longevity, and that can continue to exist well into the future.

Still frame from Star Trek: Scouts showing Roo, with Sprocket and JR in the background.
A Star Trek series for kids is a good idea.

This is categorically not a “review” of Star Trek: Scouts, by the way. I’m not in the two-to-five demographic (believe it or not), so my thoughts about the actual content of this kind of show really wouldn’t be worth much! That’s not to say I don’t find joy in some cartoons or films aimed at a younger audience… but there’s young and then there’s young, if you take my point. These sub-four-minute episodes, with very basic storylines, are cut from the same cloth as something like Cocomelon, and for their intended audience, I’m sure they’ll be perfectly enjoyable.

What I’m interested in, as a Star Trek fan, is the potential for the franchise to belatedly break out of its demographic prison cell and finally attract a new audience. The tl;dr is that Star Trek is ageing… and if that continues unchecked, the fan community will die out. Shows like Prodigy and films like Section 31 were supposed to change that, attracting a younger audience and an audience raised on Marvel movies, respectively. I don’t think either project really met the moment and achieved those objectives… but there’s a chance, at least, for Scouts to appeal to a very young crowd, some of whom will go on to explore the Star Trek universe in more depth as they grow up. That can only be a good thing.

Still frame from Star Trek: Scouts showing the main character trio.
The three main characters.

I am disappointed, though, that Scouts is currently hosted on the YouTube channel of a different Nickelodeon series. That confused branding and mixed messaging won’t help. And, as I said several years ago when discussing Prodigy: where are the toys and tie-in products? None have been created in time for the show’s launch… and that’s still not good enough from Paramount. Kids – especially younger kids in the age range Scouts is pitched at – engage with their favourite worlds through play. Toys, dolls, dress-up costumes… all of these things should have been ready for eager kids and parents to coincide with the launch. It’s pretty stupid that they weren’t – and it’s going to hold back Scouts’ potential unless and until these kinds of toys are ready to go.

Some cartoons only exist to serve as glorified toy commercials. But despite owning the Nickelodeon brand – and knowing what it takes to market to kids successfully – Paramount is, for the second time, refusing to make kid-friendly Star Trek merchandise for its kid-friendly Star Trek series. I can’t be the only one to think that’s a mistake, can I? Or that it’s undermining the very idea behind creating a series like this?

Still frame from Star Trek: Scouts showing Roo and a tricorder.
Roo using a tricorder.

It’s not my intention to be overly negative, and this criticism is intended to be constructive. I’d love to think a show like Star Trek: Scouts will succeed, and will bring in younger fans to the Star Trek community at just the right moment. Star Trek needs that. And with Prodigy and Starfleey Academy, too, there’ll be no shortage of shows for younger viewers to sink their teeth into when they graduate from this kind of preschool cartoon and want something a bit more grown-up. Those are all great things, and Star Trek could – with the right management and leadership – really synergise these younger-focused series to give kids, tweens, and teens a route into the Star Trek fandom.

But so far, I don’t see a lot of effort on that side. I didn’t see it from the old Paramount at all, and I don’t see it from the new Skydance-owned Paramount, either. The launch of Scouts – with no fanfare, no tie-in products, and on a YouTube channel branded after a different show (not even the main Nickelodeon channel) – just smacks of a lack of care, a lack of attention, and a lack of effort or interest. And if that’s the case… why bother? Why commit money to a project like this only to not follow through and give it the best chance of success? It’s just… wasteful.

Still frame from Star Trek: Scouts showing HQ.
The kids’ HQ… complete with giant phaser beam.

I’m also a little disappointed with some – thankfully a minority, as far as I can tell – of the reactions to Scouts online. Some folks are completely unable to grasp the idea that not every single media project or piece of content is made specifically for them, and I’ve seen people saying Scouts is “childish,” “basic,” and “a joke,” as if it was somehow meant to be something a grown adult would enjoy. So let’s say it loud and clear for the people getting upset about Scouts not being as deep and complex as episodes like The Drumhead:

It’s a show for two-year-olds.

We all get it now, yeah? It’s gonna have basic plots, child characters, and not a lot of world-building or complexity. That’s by design! Not every show – and not every Star Trek show – is made for everyone. Scouts, more so even than Prodigy before it, is targeting a very specific audience, and a very young audience. It’s not for me – but it’s not supposed to be. I’m glad that there’s some effort being made to make some of the basic trappings and aesthetic elements of Star Trek appeal to a new, younger audience – even though I wish some of the execution was being handled a bit more professionally.

Still frame from Star Trek: Scouts showing the three main characters jumping.
To boldly go…

This is probably gonna be the last time I touch base with Scouts… though with my niece being born earlier this year, maybe if it’s still around in a couple of years’ time, I’ll recommend it for her! I think the idea of creating a project like this – a potential easy way into Star Trek for even the youngest viewers – is no bad thing, and I will be rooting for its success, even though Skydance and Paramount don’t seem to be all that bothered one way or another.

So that’s all for today, I guess. Star Trek: Scouts exists. If you have young kids (or you’re a child at heart; no judgment), you can find the first two episodes on YouTube, with a promise of some eighteen more to come. I think there are plans to broadcast episodes on Nickelodeon or Nick Jr., too, in regions where those channels are available, so keep an eye out for that, too.

And if Scouts isn’t for you… that’s okay. There are almost 950 episodes and films in the Star Trek franchise that you might like instead.


Star Trek: Scouts is out now and can be streamed via the Blaze and the Monster Machines YouTube channel at time of writing. The Star Trek franchise – including Scouts – is the copyright of Skydance/Paramount and Nickelodeon. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.

So, About That Star Trek Comedy Series…

We’ve had Comic-Con, where Star Trek made a splash with news about Starfleet Academy, Khan, and a pitch for a Strange New Worlds successor series. And now it’s Star Trek Las Vegas – a huge Star Trek convention with many of the franchise’s biggest stars in attendance. In between, there was a tiny little tidbit of news you may have missed – Paramount Global and Skydance Media finally completed their expensive and much-delayed corporate merger.

Last year, Tawny Newsome, Alex Kurtzman, and Paramount surprised a lot of us by announcing a brand-new Star Trek series – a “workplace comedy” which Newsome and Justin Simien were working on together. I noted at the time that the announcement seemed pretty threadbare, as if it had been thrown together at the last minute, and we didn’t really get a lot of details about it beyond who was writing it and that it might be set outside of Starfleet.

Justin Simien (left) and Tawny Newsome were working on this series.

Star Trek and comedy go well together, and they have done since the franchise’s inception. I made this argument when Lower Decks was in the offing and some fans were upset about it, because comedy has always been a part of Star Trek and will always have a place in Star Trek. Given the other options for new Star Trek shows and films, I don’t think I’d have necessarily chosen Newsome’s comedy pitch myself, but that’s beside the point. I’d have happily tuned in and I’d have wanted the new series to do well.

Note the past tense.

In the aftermath of Paramount’s merger, Newsome appeared at a panel at Star Trek Las Vegas. And she said something telling about her comedy series: “we’re waiting to hear” – i.e. from Skydance and Star Trek’s new corporate leadership about the show’s future – which she followed up with: “not to sound bleak, but nothing’s guaranteed.”

Star Trek’s new corporate overlords.

So… the comedy series ain’t happening, then. I mean, it’s not happening, is it? I would be astonished at this stage if it goes ahead; of all the proposals on the table for expanding the Star Trek franchise, it’s gotta be way down the list for the new team coming in. And I don’t think this is a huge shock – obviously Skydance plans to continue with Strange New Worlds’ final two seasons, and the two seasons of Starfleet Academy, one of which is complete and the other of which is already in production. But beyond that, there’s no new Star Trek being commissioned, and Skydance doesn’t seem to be obliged to fulfil Paramount’s past announcements – including Newsome’s comedy series.

Skydance CEO David Ellison seems much more interested in films than television shows. If Star Trek has a future in this new era, I would suggest at this early stage that it’ll be in feature films rather than made-for-streaming TV, based on what we can see from Skydance and Ellison at this early stage.

Skydance CEO David Ellison.

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Discovery, Lower Decks, and Strange New Worlds all had their cancellations announced after Skydance and Paramount began working on their merger, with Strange New Worlds’ cancellation being announced years ahead of time while the merger was still being completed. It seems to me that Skydance wanted to come in with a clean slate, not having commitments to make any new Star Trek series whatsoever. And the comedy series? It may have been announced already, and at least some work has taken place on writing scripts, creating characters, and so on… but it was too late to the party.

If the comedy series had already entered full production, it would be safe for at least a season. But it hasn’t – and now the new team is taking over, they evidently have no obligation to pick it up. As far as we know, no casting decisions were taken, no contracts were signed, no sets have been constructed… the only thing we can be sure of is that a pitch and some scripts exist. And it’s very easy to put those in the old circular filing cabinet.

The announcement from last year’s Comic-Con.

What we heard from Tawny Newsome in Las Vegas feels more like Michael Dorn’s “Captain Worf” idea from a few years ago, or when Robert Duncan McNeill pitched a “Captain Proton” series to ViacomCBS. These are ideas that some fans might’ve liked, others might not have been into… but they never got off the ground despite clearly having a lot of thought and work put into them. I don’t believe that Goldsman and Meyers will succeed with their “Year One” pitch, and based on what we’ve just heard, I doubt that Newsome and Simien’s comedy series will go ahead, either.

And that’s a shame. As a Star Trek fan, I’d rather see the franchise in production than not – even if the kinds of shows being made wouldn’t have been my first choice. Obviously I’d be really keen on an idea like Legacy, or any kind of Strange New Worlds-inspired episodic series set somewhere after Picard. But if that’s not an option, I’d happily accept Year One or the comedy series. There’s potential in both, and I’m sure Skydance would make money on them.

Whether it’s a Strange New Worlds sequel, a comedy series, or something else… I just want more Star Trek!

But the direction of travel has changed. We’ve seen that with the cancellations. This current era of streaming Star Trek is, in my view, coming to an end in the next few years – possibly as early as 2028 or 2029 when the final episodes of Strange New Worlds and Starfleet Academy will air. Skydance’s new team might be interested in commissioning a feature film – and as luck would have it, there are several scripts being worked on – but I don’t think they’re interested in taking Star Trek forward on streaming at the moment. That might change, depending on all kinds of factors, and the more noise we can make as fans, and the more attention we can draw to Star Trek the better the franchise’s prospects will be! But for Ellison and Skydance, I just don’t believe they see much value in the Star Trek brand right now.

And that’s probably what’s done it for the comedy series. It’s a shame, because even though this wouldn’t have been my first choice for a new Star Trek production, there was still potential. And anything set after the Picard era is going to be of interest, even if it wasn’t the kind of exploration-focused episodic series that I’d have preferred. Maybe Skydance can be convinced to make a show like that… but I’m not holding my breath.

Tawny Newsome (c) with Paul Tompkins (l) and Wil Wheaton in 2022.

As we talked about when Strange New Worlds was cancelled… the blunt fact of the matter is that I don’t expect to see much more Star Trek beyond about 2028. When the shows that are currently in production make it to air and then conclude their runs, I really get the sense that that’ll be it – at least on the small screen. A fourth Kelvin film, or possibly some other cinematic adaptation, could still be possible in the years ahead, but for me, Star Trek has always been better-suited to television than the cinema.

I think in the weeks or months ahead we’ll have to lay out what’s gone wrong for Star Trek in this era of streaming television – and how Paramount’s outgoing executives took what could’ve been a golden opportunity and ended up pissing all over it. Star Trek could have been well-positioned as a big-budget, flagship franchise – but so many things went wrong, from the rollout of Paramount+ to Paramount’s inability to bring younger fans on board in significant numbers. But that’ll have to be the subject of a longer piece.

So long, Paramount. We won’t miss you.

For now, it seems to me as if Newsome’s comedy show is dead – albeit unofficially at this stage. And while you may not be terribly disappointed about that on an individual level (as I’m not, to be honest with you), I think it says a lot about the Skydance merger and Star Trek’s future under this new corporation. And that does genuinely have me worried, because it feels like we’ve only just got Star Trek back after more than a decade in the wilderness. To think it could be shutting down again so soon – and with so much potential left behind – is a bitter pill to swallow.

But hey, maybe I’m wrong. Maybe Skydance will announce their commitment to this project – and to many more Star Trek shows, films, and video games! We can cross our fingers and hope, right?


The Star Trek franchise – including all films and series discussed above – is the copyright of the new Paramount-Skydance Corporation. Credit to TrekMovie.com for the initial reporting on Tawny Newsome’s comments. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.

Bad News For Strange New Worlds…

A Star Trek spoiler warning graphic.

Spoiler Warning: Beware of very minor spoilers for Strange New Worlds Seasons 1 and 2, Discovery Seasons 1 and 2, and Picard.

If you follow Star Trek on social media, or really any of the big Star Trek fansites or channels, you’ve probably already heard the news that Strange New Worlds is to be cancelled after a truncated fifth season. I find this to be an especially disappointing blow, as Strange New Worlds has been the best show – and by far the best live-action show – since Star Trek’s small-screen resurrection back in 2017. Captain Pike has been telling us in voiceover form that the Enterprise is on a “five-year mission,” of course, but I’m not gonna lie: a big part of me was hoping that this show would continue to go from strength to strength, pushing past that five-year mark.

This decision is quite clearly coming from the corporate side. Paramount’s finances have been bad for a long time, Paramount+ is on shaky ground as very much a second-tier streaming service, and the ongoing Skydance merger seems to be pretty convoluted, even by industry standards. So I’m not stunned at this news – just as Discovery’s cancellation, Lower Decks’ cancellation, and the lack of interest in Star Trek: Legacy didn’t shock me too much, either. But that doesn’t make it any more pleasant or easy to digest.

Logo of Skydance - the corporation soon to merge with Paramount.
Skydance and Paramount are involved in a messy buyout/merger.

It seems odd to announce the cancellation at this stage: a few weeks before Season 3’s premiere, and potentially two, three, or even four years before the show’s fifth and final season will be broadcast. Is it not at least possible that high viewership and a strong fan reaction to Seasons 3, 4, and 5 could make the show a more intriguing business proposition? With the Skydance merger still ongoing and a new leadership team potentially coming in, mightn’t they be interested in the flagship series for one of Paramount’s biggest franchises? Or conversely, did Skydance insist on cancelling Strange New Worlds – and perhaps other Star Trek projects, too – ahead of the merger?

We may never learn exactly what happened or what the ins and outs of it all were. But it’s disappointing in more ways than one to learn that Strange New Worlds isn’t being given more of a chance. I don’t know what the show’s viewership has been like, but I would remind everyone that Season 1 wasn’t available internationally at first, so there’s only really been one full season that was available around the world on Paramount+ on broadcast day. It feels premature to cancel the show when you bear that fact in mind. And that’s not to mention that, historically speaking, Star Trek shows tend to improve as they go along, picking up more support and viewers from their second seasons onwards.

Behind-the-scenes photo from the set of Strange New Worlds Season 4 showing Adrian Holmes and Anson Mount in costume.
Adrian Holmes (Admiral April) with Anson Mount (Captain Pike) on the set of Strange New Worlds Season 4.

Then there’s the shortened fifth season. Season 5 will run to a mere six episodes instead of the usual ten. What, were those extra four episodes really fucking up the budget that badly? Is Paramount so broke that the corporation can’t stump up a few extra dollars for four episodes of a series that’s already in production, where the majority of its sets are already built, and the main roles are already cast? C’mon… that’s just pathetic.

Strange New Worlds has been the high-water mark of modern Star Trek. But, as with almost everything Paramount’s executive fuckwits have touched over the past decade, some appalling decision-making at the highest levels has worked against the show and its prospects. Oversaturation of the Star Trek brand is a major contributing factor, with Strange New Worlds having to compete for attention against four other Star Trek shows at various points, including episodes of Picard which were literally broadcast on the exact same day. Then there was the piss-poor decision to cut off the series from anyone outside of the United States during its critical first season. And even when Strange New Worlds was available and wasn’t being trodden all over by other Star Trek shows… it didn’t get much of a marketing budget, hardly any tie-in merchandise, and Paramount always seemed to treat the show as secondary to Discovery and Picard. Even as those shows came to the end of their runs, there wasn’t as much love for Strange New Worlds as there should’ve been.

Still frame from Strange New Worlds Season 1 showing Captain Pike on horseback.
Captain Pike in the series premiere.

I heaped praise on Paramount back in 2020 for commissioning Strange New Worlds. The show wouldn’t have come to exist without the incredibly positive reaction fans had to Pike and Spock’s roles in Discovery Season 2, and I think it’s worth acknowledging how at least some folks at Paramount had the basic business acumen to recognise that. Strange New Worlds was prioritised ahead of Section 31, arguably contributing to that series being put on hold and eventually re-worked into the TV movie we got earlier this year. And I stand by what I’ve said multiple times: that was the right decision. Fans were clamouring for more adventures with these versions of Pike and Spock, as well as for an episodic series that returned Star Trek to its roots. It’s no exaggeration to say that Strange New Worlds is the Star Trek show that I and many other Trekkies had been waiting for for a very long time.

There’ll be time in the months and years ahead to give Strange New Worlds a proper autopsy, discussing what went wrong, what went right, and what lessons the newly-formed Skydance-Paramount corporation can learn for Star Trek’s future… if Star Trek has a future beyond the next few years. But for now… I just feel like wallowing, to be honest with you. The timing of the news caught me off-guard, with Season 3’s marketing campaign ramping up, and while a five-season run is in keeping with modern Star Trek and with Pike’s “five-year mission,” I’m still disappointed to learn that the end is nigh for Strange New Worlds.

Still frame from Strange New Worlds Season 2 showing the USS Enterprise.
The USS Enterprise.

Let’s talk a little about the timing, because this really is a bit of an oddity, isn’t it?

We’re weeks away from Season 3’s premiere. A new trailer was released just a few days ago. The cast are soon gonna be out and about on the interview circuit. This is categorically not the time to announce that the show is being cancelled! It risks overshadowing the marketing push for Season 3, and it risks turning away potential viewers. What’s the point, after all, in tuning in for Season 3 if the show’s about to be canned? A lot of people won’t read the whole press release; they’ll hear “Strange New Worlds is being cancelled” and push the series out of their minds. Paramount has always struggled with timing – and with plenty of other incredibly basic things that practically every other entertainment corporation handles better – but even by their standards this is pretty bad.

The only thing I can think of to justify the announcement is this: the news was about to be leaked. Someone at Paramount got wind of an imminent leak and jumped in first, trying to head it off. Maybe that’s what happened… I don’t know. It seems to me to be the only logical justification for the timing of this announcement.

Promo photo from Strange New Worlds Season 2 showing Spock.
Spock.

So what does all of this mean for Star Trek’s future?

This might have to be the subject of a longer piece in the weeks ahead (when I’ve had more time to process things and get my thoughts in order) but I have a couple of things to say at this stage.

Firstly, I sincerely hope Strange New Worlds can be Star Trek’s last prequel series – at least for a good long while. There were fun moments in Enterprise, Discovery’s first couple of seasons, and the Kelvin films… but for a franchise that’s always been about looking to the future, prequels have never felt right to me. Strange New Worlds has, in my view, been outstanding… but if there is to be more Star Trek on our screens in the years ahead, let’s move the timeline along instead of re-treading old ground. Many Strange New Worlds episodes would’ve worked just as well – if not better – had they been set in the Picard era. A few small tweaks here and there and you’d be all set!

Still frame from the Strange New Worlds Season 3 teaser showing Captain Pike.
Star Trek doesn’t need another prequel series.

Secondly, I feel increasingly certain that, by the time we get to 2028 or 2029, Star Trek as a whole will cease production.

There are other projects in production right now: two seasons of Starfleet Academy and potentially at least one season of Tawny Newsome’s “workplace comedy” show. To me, a reasonably plausible timeline might see us get Starfleet Academy next year, Strange New Worlds Season 4 in 2027, Starfleet Academy and/or the comedy show in 2028, and Strange New Worlds’ finale in 2028 or 2029. But after that? Paramount’s merger will have fully concluded, and it’ll be up to the new executives to decide what – if anything – they want to do with Star Trek.

When Paramount+ was beginning its painfully slow rollout a few years ago, I said that I wouldn’t be surprised if the streaming platform doesn’t make it to the end of the decade. And despite talks of a potential merger of Paramount+ with another platform, I feel like that looks more and more likely, too. The future of streaming feels like it’s going to consolidate around a few large, profitable platforms, meaning second-tier, unprofitable ones like Paramount+ are on the way out. I don’t see the merger changing that, either.

The logo of Paramount+ on a blue background.
Will Paramount+ survive the decade?

What that means for Star Trek is that, if the franchise survives, it’ll likely be licesned out to someone like Netflix or Amazon in the future, rather than being made for Paramount’s own platform. Even in the Paramount+ era we’ve seen this; Prodigy was recently licensed to Netflix, though that deal is shortly coming to an end. With Netflix having been burned before, though, with both Discovery and Prodigy… will they want to make another investment in this beleaguered brand? If Star Trek kind of fizzles out in the second half of the 2020s, will it be an appealing prospect to any big streaming platform in the future?

Maybe we’re getting ahead of ourselves. It’s still possible that the remaining seasons of Strange New Worlds or Starfleet Academy will bring in new viewers, attracting new eyes to Star Trek at just the right time to greenlight more from the franchise! Maybe that’s a little too optimistic for this moment, but my point is that you never know. Strange New Worlds is fantastic with its episodic storytelling, and Starfleet Academy has the potential, at least, to appeal to younger folks. There are a couple of glimmers of hope there, I feel.

Still frame from the Strange New Worlds Season 3 trailer showing multiple main characters with wine glasses.
Here’s to Strange New Worlds

But none of that can hide the disappointment of today. Strange New Worlds – the show spawned by a fan campaign and which quickly became the best thing Star Trek has done in years – is cancelled. And Season 5 won’t even manage a measly ten episodes.

I’m glad that Star Trek was resurrected in 2017, and there have been some fantastic, hilarious, and emotional episodes produced over the past eight years. But we’re seeing the effect of Paramount’s epic mismanagement now; shows failing to find an audience, being either cut off from the world or squashed up too tightly together, and ultimately the result is premature cancellation. I don’t know what the future might hold for Star Trek beyond Strange New Worlds’ finale… but I hope whoever’s in charge of the franchise by that point does a better job than the current crop of executive morons.

Despite this disappointing news, I still hope to watch and review Strange New Worlds Season 3 later this summer, so be sure to check back for that. Until then… well, I don’t really have any encouraging or optimistic words to end on, I’m afraid.


Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Seasons 1 and 2 are available to stream now on Paramount+ and are also available on DVD and Blu-ray. Season 3 will premiere on the 17th of July. The Star Trek franchise – including Strange New Worlds and all other properties discussed above – remains the copyright of Paramount Global. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.