2026 Predictions…

A Star Trek-themed spoiler warning

Spoiler Warning: Beware of minor spoilers for some of the franchises discussed below.

I thought it could be a bit of fun to mark the start of the year by making a few predictions! This isn’t something that I usually do here on the website, but if it proves to be enjoyable, maybe I’ll make it an annual thing… who knows? For now, though, I wanted to look ahead to 2026 and share some of my predictions for what may happen in the wide world of geeky entertainment.

I’ll give a couple of important caveats, and then I’ll explain the format I’m going to use.

Firstly, I have no “insider information,” and I’m not trying to claim that anything discussed below can, will, or must happen in 2026. These are my own predictions based on… I dunno. Vibes, I guess? And, as always, all of this is the *subjective, not objective* opinion of just one person. If I miss something that you think is obvious, or I predict something you think sounds utterly ridiculous… that’s okay! This is just for fun, and I share my predictions with you in that spirit.

Still frame from a 1995 National Lottery broadcast showing Mystic Meg.
Do you remember Mystic Meg?

Okay, let’s talk format! I’ve got four categories into which my predictions will fall: Films, Games, Television, and the Star Trek Franchise. And within each category, I’m going to make three predictions using the 90/50/10 format: that’s one thing I’m 90% sure will happen, one that I’m 50/50 on, and an outlier that I think has a remote 10% chance of happening – but probably won’t!

So… have we got all that? Four categories, three predictions in each! I’ll briefly explain my prediction, discuss why I think it may or may not happen, and just generally share my thoughts on why I think it’s likely or plausible.

With all of that out of the way, let’s get started and try to predict what 2026 will look like!

Film – 90% Prediction:
A KPop Demon Hunters sequel will be announced.

Still frame from KPop Demon Hunters showing Zoey, Rumi, and Mira at the climax of the film.
Huntr/x.

KPop Demon Hunters was one of the most successful films of 2025 – and I don’t just say that because it won the highly-coveted End-of-Year Award here at Trekking with Dennis! The film topped the charts for weeks on end, becoming Netflix’s most popular original animated film ever, earned itself a sell-out theatrical release, and even saw its soundtrack reach the top of the charts, dethroning the likes of Taylor Swift in the process.

So it’s a shoo-in, then, surely, that Netflix and Sony Pictures Animation will announce a sequel within the next twelve months.

I’m not someone who believes that every successful film should – or even *can* – be turned into an ongoing franchise, and I think there’s merit in the idea of one-off, complete stories that don’t need to be revisited. But I also recognise that, in the modern entertainment landscape, big corporations don’t behave like that! Any successful film is bound to see a sequel; to Netflix and Sony, it would be like leaving guaranteed money on the table. Rumours of a KPop Demon Hunters sequel are already beginning to swirl, and I’d expect the companies involved to want to get a formal announcement out while the film is still popular to capitalise on that momentum to the highest possible degree.

Film – 50% Prediction:
The Mandalorian and Grogu will be a box office bomb.

Promo image (cropped) for The Mandalorian and Grogu showing the title characters on a sand dune.
The title characters.

Star Wars is in a weird place right now. The brand is oversaturated, with Disney having produced so much content just since 2019 that it’s hard for even big fans of the franchise to keep up. The Mandalorian and Grogu is supposed to be the final chapter of the Disney+ series The Mandalorian, but the show’s third season received mixed reviews, as did The Book of Boba Fett spin-off. I’m not sure that the fanbase is there for The Mandalorian in 2026 in the way it was in 2019, and given how Star Wars as a whole has been mishandled, I could easily see this one flopping hard at the box office.

However, this is Star Wars’ first trip to the cinema since 2019, and it’s possible that a more casual audience – folks who haven’t been trying to keep up with everything Star Wars on Disney+ – will show up for that. I don’t think it’s a guaranteed failure, hence its position on this list. But if I were an executive at Disney, I’d be concerned.

Film – 10% Prediction:
The first film with a digitally-recreated dead actor in a leading role will be announced.

Still frame from Rogue One: A Star Wars Story showing Tarkin (a digital model based on actor Peter Cushing).
A digital recreation of Peter Cushing in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.

I’ve believed for a long time now – even since before “generative A.I.” was a big deal – that we weren’t far off a snooty director deciding that the leading role in their magnum opus could *only* be played by someone like James Dean or Marilyn Monroe. And with today’s technology – motion capture, voice cloning, facial animations, etc. – it’s technologically feasible to bring back long-dead actors in films. As far back as 2016, we saw this, when the Star Wars franchise digitally recreated both Peter Cushing and a young Carrie Fisher in Rogue One. And the technology has only improved over the last decade.

What we still haven’t seen, though, is a film where the *lead* role is “played” by a long-dead performer. That’s different from using a lookalike or recreating an actor for just a couple of scenes, and I think it would be incredibly controversial. There’d be arguments over who owns the rights to the performer’s likeness and image… but that’s something a project could clear. Whether a film like this would be any good, and whether a digital performance (perhaps assisted by A.I.) would actually be worth watching… the jury’s out, I guess. But as I’ve said before: people care more about the finished product than the process that went into it, so if a film that was created using this method was good, and the result was basically indistinguishable… it could start a whole new trend!

Video Games – 90% Prediction:
Prices will rise even further.

Promo/concept art of Wario for the Nintendo game Wario Ware.
Gaming is already too expensive…

Sorry, everyone. I’m not happy about it, but after several years of price hikes across the games industry, I don’t see this unfortunate trend stopping. Grand Theft Auto VI could legitimately launch with a base price of $100, which would almost certainly see other publishers raise their prices to match. And with component shortages thanks to A.I. datacentres buying up large volumes of stock – as well as major manufacturers “pivoting” to an A.I.-first strategy – hardware prices may very well rise, too.

2025 saw the Switch 2 launch at an inflated price, as well as the first $80 game. It also saw price hikes from Sony and Microsoft, as well as a rise in the price of the Game Pass subscription service. Much of this isn’t actually a reaction to events – it’s plain and simple greed. These things are a cause of, not a consequence of, inflation. But, regrettably, I don’t see it stopping anytime soon, especially if sales remain weak. Games companies will try to wring more money out of existing players to compensate for a lack of new ones.

Video Games – 50% Prediction:
Microsoft and Xbox will announce a new Fallout game… which is not being developed by Bethesda.

Promo screenshot for Fallout 76 featuring a playable ghoul character wearing headphones.
Is a new Fallout game close to being announced?

With The Elder Scrolls VI still years away, and the Fallout TV series riding high on Amazon Prime Video, it’s not exactly a secret that Microsoft and Xbox want a new Fallout game for fans to sink their teeth into. But because of Bethesda’s absolutely idiotic and outdated approach to making video games, their hypothetical version of Fallout 5 may not even *begin* development until 2029, and likely won’t see the light of day until, say, 2034 or beyond.

So could Microsoft hit the nuclear button (pun very much intended) and take Fallout away from Bethesda? If it were to happen, there’d surely be a ton of PR-speak about how this new game is a spin-off, the license is still Bethesda’s, Microsoft still has full confidence in Bethesda… blah, blah, blah. But it would also speak volumes about how far Bethesda has fallen since their 2000s heyday, and how their approach to creating games needs to change if they still want to tell stories in multiple franchises.

Video Games – 10% Prediction:
Grand Theft Auto VI fails to meet its sales targets and is considered an expensive failure.

Still frame from the second GTA 6 trailer showing the protagonists riding on a jet ski.
Protagonists Jason and Lucia on a jet ski.

No video game is a “guaranteed” hit. Not even the sequel to the most successful video game of all-time. So I consider it an outside possibility that, for any one of a number of reasons, Grand Theft Auto VI fails to convince fans of GTA 5 that they need to switch to the new game, with its online mode in particular struggling to gain traction. Players who do buy the game and try out the online mode could even drift back to GTA 5 if it isn’t what they’re hoping for. The result? GTA 6 could go down in history as one of the most expensive video game flops.

To be clear, while I can conceive of a world in which something like this happens, it feels very unlikely – hence its place on this list! But there are reasons to be concerned if you’re a Take-Two executive. Slow hardware sales for the PS5 and Xbox Series, combined with GTA 6 not getting a PC release, mean there’s a smaller potential audience for the game. Price rises for the game itself and the hardware it plays on in a difficult economy could price people out. And if GTA 5 is still fun and enjoyable for its online players, convincing them to switch to a new game – especially if it means an investment of £650-700 to buy the game and a new console to play it on – won’t be a walk in the park.

Television – 90% Prediction:
Either 3 Body Problem or Strange New Worlds will be my “TV Series of the Year” in December.

Cropped promo posters for 3 Body Problem S1 (left) and Star Trek: Strange New Worlds S1 (right).
3 Body Problem (left) and Strange New Worlds.

I dish out my annual “End-of-Year Awards” every December – in fact, I just did the awards for 2025 a couple of days ago; click or tap here to check them out! But when I look ahead to 2026, there are really only a couple of shows that I think (at this early stage) could be in contention for the top award. Those are 3 Body Problem and Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. I’d be very surprised if something else comes along this year and eclipses *both* of these productions; the only one I could see even possibly doing so would be Silo.

Strange New Worlds is far and away the best modern Star Trek series, and even one of the best parts of the franchise as a whole. I was very disappointed to learn it would be cancelled after a cut-down fifth season. And 3 Body Problem’s first season was one of the best, most grown-up sci-fi shows I’ve seen in a long time. I’m genuinely looking forward to both shows’ continuations – and unless, for some reason, neither debuts in 2026, I’m almost positive they’ll be competing for my “TV Series of the Year” award in eleven-and-a-bit months from now!

Television – 50% Prediction:
A big, long-running series will finally be cancelled.

Still frame from The Simpsons depicting a "ratings graph" showing a steep decline.
It might be some kind of visual metaphor…

There are quite a few shows floating around that have been running for fifteen years or more. Grey’s Anatomy, Family Guy, Law and Order, Doctor Who, SpongeBob SquarePants, Criminal Minds, The Simpsons… the list goes on. But some of these shows are almost unrecognisable from their original incarnations, or worse, feel like they’re just going through the motions and coasting on past success. I tried for years to keep up with The Simpsons, for example, even though I could feel the quality declining. But I haven’t watched any new episodes for several seasons at this point, and it just feels like the show has well and truly run its course.

The Simpsons has been renewed for several more seasons and – inexplicably – another movie. But could we learn in 2026 that the show will eventually end? Or could another long-running programme, like Doctor Who’s revival, SpongeBob SquarePants, or Grey’s Anatomy, finally find themselves on the chopping block? I’d always rather a show end too soon, leaving me wanting more and lamenting that we didn’t get “just one more episode,” instead of running too long and becoming a joke. Maybe 2026 will finally be the year that one or more of these long-running television institutions kicks the bucket.

Television – 10% Prediction:
The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power will be cancelled after Season 3.

Promo still for The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power showing Elrond on horseback.
It’s Elrond!

The Rings of Power hasn’t been everyone’s favourite show, to put it mildly. And with long breaks in between seasons – Season 3 is not guaranteed to land in 2026, despite Season 2 wrapping up in the autumn of 2024 – even the folks who did tune in have begun to find other things to watch. Although Amazon and the Tolkien Estate had an agreement to make five seasons of The Rings of Power… are we sure the series will hit that mark?

According to some reports, The Rings of Power shed boatloads of viewers across its first season, with barely one-third of the people who watched the premiere making it to the finale. And Season 2 didn’t bring them back. No TV show is going to be worth making if no one’s turning up to watch it, let alone the most expensive TV series ever made. And with middling reviews from audiences, and a baked-in hate campaign from some folks online… The Rings of Power could, hypothetically, be more vulnerable than we thought. Amazon has done this before with another high fantasy show: The Wheel of Time was cancelled before its story could be wrapped up.

Star Trek – 90% Prediction:
Starfleet Academy will be confirmed to run for just two seasons.

Cropped promo poster for Star Trek: Starfleet Academy showing the main characters.
Will there be more Starfleet Academy after Season 2?

Unless Starfleet Academy can do something extraordinary that no other Star Trek show of the current streaming era has done, I think we’ll learn that there won’t be a third season. The series would, in my view, need to go viral and become a phenomenon – particularly with its younger target audience. If Starfleet Academy can genuinely compete with the likes of Stranger Things and Wednesday in terms of review scores and audience numbers, and also drive a massive, unprecedented number of new subscribers to Paramount+, then – and only then – would Skydance consider renewing the show.

But… do we really think that’s gonna happen?

I’ve said a few times now that I’m not particularly hyped for Starfleet Academy. The show, with its serialised story and teen focus, just doesn’t seem like it’ll be my thing. But that’s not why it’s part of this discussion. I’d love nothing more than to see Starfleet Academy succeed at bringing in legions of new fans to the franchise. I just struggle to see how it’ll manage to do so. And given Skydance’s obvious preference for films over TV, and the cancellations of all other Star Trek shows, I just get the sense that the two seasons which have already entered production will be all the series will get.

Star Trek – 50% Prediction:
Paramount-Skydance will do very little to celebrate the franchise’s 60th anniversary.

The "Star Trek 60" logo on a Starfleet Academy set photo.
Star Trek turns 60 years old in 2026.

With the exception of soap operas, how many TV shows reach their 60th anniversary with new episodes still being created and aired? Star Trek is practically unique amongst big sci-fi properties – heck, amongst entertainment franchises in general. Yet I don’t think that this new incarnation of Paramount really intends to do anything major to acknowledge the milestone. We’ve heard talk of a float at some parade in the United States. And Star Trek’s god-awful online shop will probably release some crappy A.I.-generated merch, like tote bags and beanies, featuring the new “Star Trek 60” logo. But will there be a crossover episode? Some kind of unannounced project that really leans into what Star Trek means and goes all-in?

I would *love* to see Paramount/Skydance do something big. A live broadcast, maybe, reuiniting the stars of past shows to talk all things Trek. Or a documentary about the creation of those early episodes. I’d really love to see a crossover – like we got in 1996 for the 30th anniversary. Maybe we could see Starfleet Academy characters visiting Pike’s Enterprise, or even using the Strange New World sets and bringing back some of the performers to re-tell a classic TOS story. Because Star Trek had gone off the air, we couldn’t get anything like that for the 40th or the 50th. But there’s a window of opportunity right now, in 2026, that may not come again, to really celebrate Star Trek with some kind of big on-screen event. I really hope Skydance has already given it the green light.

Star Trek – 10% Prediction:
A brand-new series will be announced.

Concept art of the USS Enterprise created for Phase II/The Motion Picture.
Will there be more Star Trek to come?

This one… I mean, it’s not gonna happen, is it? Don’t get me wrong: I’d love nothing more than for Skydance to make the genuinely shocking announcement that they’re commissioning a brand-new, episodic, exploration-focused Star Trek series! But I think it’s a remote possibility right now, given the new corporation’s clear choice to prioritise the cinema over television and streaming. A new Star Trek film has been announced and is potentially targeting a 2028 release, so will we see a new show announced before then?

My view remains that Star Trek as a whole – save for the occasional film project – will be shutting down for the foreseeable future after 2027 or 2028, whenever the final episodes of Starfleet Academy and Strange New Worlds air. But there’s still so much potential in this franchise, and it’s downright depressing to go into the big sixtieth anniversary year predicting cancellation and failure. So I’m crossing my fingers that we’ll get just one new series being announced.

So that’s it.

A render of the number 2026 in green.
2026 is just beginning.

I’ve made a few predictions for 2026, so let’s revisit this piece together in late December to see how much I got wrong! This is my first year making predictions like these, but I really like the 90/50/10 format, so I might try to make it an annual thing… if I remember. And if, next year, I actually have more predictions to make!

In any case, I hope this has been interesting, or just a bit of fun. I’m hopeful for some enjoyable entertainment experiences this year, and I’ll be doing my best to keep up with some of the films, games, and TV shows that I’ve been looking forward to – so stay tuned for some reviews and commentary here on the website!


All titles discussed above are the copyright of their respective developer, publisher, broadcaster, studio, distributor, etc. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.

Video game prices set to rise

As I hinted at last time, video game prices may be going up when the next generation of home consoles launch later this year. Currently, brand-new video games cost $59.99 in the USA and £49.99-£54.99 in the UK, but this could rise significantly – potentially hitting $69.99 in the US, with a comparable rise in the UK to £59.99-£64.99. If prices go up in one market, it seems a sure thing they’ll rise elsewhere as well, so we mustn’t be fooled into thinking this is a US-only issue.

It’s felt for a while as though games companies were playing a long game of “chicken” when it comes to being the first to announce a price hike. No company wanted the criticism that would inevitably come with going first, but 2K Games could wait no longer and announced that the price for the Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 versions of their basketball game NBA 2K21 would be $69.99 in the United States. Now that the proverbial dam has a crack, I expect the whole thing to come crashing down as other major publishers follow suit. While at time of writing only NBA 2K21 is priced this way, it really feels like an inevitability that many other next-gen titles will join it.

NBA 2K21 is the first game to announce a significant price hike for next-generation consoles. More will surely follow.

Video game prices have been static for years. Prices rose when the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 were launched, but since then there hasn’t been any change – at least not to the price of the basic version of games. In 2005-06, downloadable content and in-game microtransactions were rare – DLC primarily consisted of large-scale expansion packs, and microtransactions, where they existed at all, were mostly just in massively-multiplayer online games. The gaming landscape has changed significantly since, and many games today – even those that retail for the full-price of $59.99 or £54.99 – still have in-game marketplaces, in-game currencies, microtransactions, single-use items for purchase, lootboxes, and myriad other ways to vacuum up cash from players. Many of these systems debuted in mobile games and free-to-play titles, but they have become commonplace in full-priced games too. So while it’s true that the surface price for video games hasn’t changed in almost 15 years, in order to get a complete game it often costs far more than that initial offering.

Some games take this to extremes. I’ve written before about Civilization VI, a turn-based strategy game for PC that I greatly enjoy. The base game costs £49.99 when not on sale, but in order to buy the complete game including all of its DLC packs – some of which consist of only a single new faction and a small number of missions – costs a whopping £144.91 if you were to buy it on PC without any discounts. And that’s not even the worst example: Europa Universalis IV, another strategy title, would cost over £300 to purchase the full game plus all of its DLC. This issue isn’t unique to strategy games either: Assassin’s Creed Odyssey costs over £95 to buy its “Ultimate” edition, Shadow of the Tomb Raider costs over £80 for its “Definitive” edition, and the “Ultimate” edition of FIFA 21 can currently be pre-ordered for the limited-time special offer price of £89.99. So it’s definitely the case that the “basic” price of video games may have been static, but buying a complete game has cost well over $59.99 or £54.99 for years.

Strategy game Europa Universalis IV costs over £300 including all of its DLC packs.

If you looked at my article about this year’s Steam Summer Sale you’ll recall that I said sales like that make PC gaming much more affordable. And that is true – aside from Animal Crossing: New Horizons and The Last of Us Part II, I haven’t paid full-price for a video game in a long time. It’s only on rare occasions, where a title is an immediate must-buy for me, that I’m willing to consider paying full price. But on consoles in particular, where sales like those on PC are less frequent and less generous, many people are stuck paying full price or close to it for most games they purchase. A £10 increase on a £54.99 title represents a price hike of 18%; a $10 rise on a $59.99 title is similar at over 16%.

If it were a black-and-white choice between paying a higher price for a complete experience versus having to buy DLC and navigate various editions, I think many gamers would be okay with the price rise. It would streamline the buying process, it would mean any game purchased would be complete without needing to buy expensive add-ons down the line, and it would be generally seen as an improvement. But no one is seriously entertaining the possibility of that being the case. The basic price of games will rise, and if we’re incredibly lucky, the prices of DLC packs and special editions will just stay the same. Those things won’t disappear because prices go up. In fact, what seems more likely to happen is that some games will hike up the prices of DLC and in-game content as well.

Gaming looks set to become a more expensive hobby going into 2021.

I’m not unsympathetic to companies who put up their prices after keeping them the same for well over a decade. But video gaming as a hobby has been growing steadily for years, and with it, the profits of games companies have grown too. While the new console generation may seem like good cover for a price hike and even a good excuse, there’s no actual reason for it. Developing a game for the Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 doesn’t cost substantially more than developing a game for the Xbox One and PlayStation 4, and when games already bring in money by the bucketload it’s hard to justify a price hike.

After the financial crash of 2007-08, it took a long time for the economy to recover. In the UK, it’s only in the last couple of years or so that austerity policies had begun to be relaxed. The coronavirus pandemic has had a massive impact on the economy all over the world, and some economists are suggesting the longer-term effects will make 2008 look like a walk in the park. Even if that’s an exaggeration, many people are not in a good financial situation at the moment, which makes it an even worse time for an arbitrary and unnecessary price rise.

However, all that being said, if the big companies of the games industry go ahead with plans to raise prices on next-generation titles, there really isn’t much we can do about it. Some have suggested boycotting games using that price, but very few online-organised gamer boycotts have ever accomplished anything. If 2K Games uses this pricing model for its other titles and other big companies follow suit, practically all new games released for the Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 will be in that $69.99 and £64.99 price bracket. People who bought new consoles will have no choice but to buy games at that price if they want to have anything to play, and with sports games like NBA 2K21 in particular being exclusive licensed titles, it isn’t possible to shop around or go elsewhere. If you want a licensed basketball game with your favourite team and players on your new console, it’s NBA 2K21 or nothing. We need only take a cursory glance at history to see how any company that has a monopoly can get away with charging whatever it wants for that product.

The PlayStation 5 will see higher prices for games than the current-gen PlayStation 4.

As the games industry marches ever closer to an all-digital future, that extra £10 or $10 per title will all go straight back to the company. Physical game shops – like Game here in the UK or Gamestop in North America – have been on incredibly shaky ground for years; if the coronavirus pandemic and months of closure hasn’t killed them off they won’t last much longer. With no need to share the extra money their games bring in with shops – as well as needing to produce an ever-decreasing number of physical copies of games anyway – companies look set to enjoy a significant increase in profits on a per-unit basis. If games were profitable at $59.99 or £54.99, they’re now raking in potentially 16-18% more revenue – and that’s all pure profit.

It’s true that a significant amount of money earned by big games companies is re-invested in making new games, and we shouldn’t ignore that as it potentially means bigger budgets for some titles – hopefully leading to better and more polished experiences. But a lot of that money goes to shareholders and investors, as well as to highly-paid CEOs and managers. Raising prices for consumers at a time of international crisis to reward a tiny number of shareholders, investors, and corporate leaders is pretty unfair.

At the end of the day, across-the-board price hikes are going to happen. 2K may have gone first, but sooner or later others will follow. Maybe the backlash – though it seems fairly muted right now – will be offputting in 2020 given all the issues in the global economy, meaning some companies hold off. But even if they wait until 2021 or 2022, the days where games cost $59.99 or £54.99 are numbered.

All titles mentioned above are the copyright of their respective studio and/or publisher. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.