Star Trek: The Next Generation Episode Re-Watch – Season 2, Episode 12: The Royale

A Star Trek-themed spoiler warning.

Spoiler Warning: There are spoilers ahead for Star Trek: The Next Generation.

Do you remember your “first contact” with the Star Trek franchise? The *very first* episode or film you ever watched?

Let’s set the scene! It’s the 19th of June, 1991. The Soviet Union, while in decline and wounded by the revolutions of 1989, still exists, and the coup attempt that finished it off hasn’t yet taken place. The England football team is still reeling from a semi-final defeat at last year’s World Cup in Italy. The World Wide Web doesn’t exist publicly yet. And Sonic the Hedgehog won’t be released on Sega’s new Mega Drive/Genesis console for a few more days.

It was also on this day that The Royale premiered in the United Kingdom, on the channel BBC 2. And this is the very first episode of Star Trek that I can ever remember watching. Thirty-five years ago this very day, I began my journey as a Trekkie. And I thought it could be fun to mark the occasion by taking a look at the episode together.

A photo of cars parked outside a railway station in the UK in 1991
I’ve chosen this photograph to represent the summer of 1991 in the UK!
Photo: Ben Brooksbank / Eastcote station, entrance 1991, via Wikimedia Commons

Okay, let’s step back for a moment. The Royale is the first episode of The Next Generation that I can remember watching in its entirety. However, I’m reasonably sure that I’d seen at least *parts* of other episodes prior to that. And my uncle, who was big TOS fan, had certainly talked Trek with me when I was a wee bairn! I can very vividly recall being enthralled with a toy phaser that he owned when I must’ve been only five or so – a solid two or three years prior to this moment. So why pick The Royale, then? Fair question!

This is the moment at which I became a regular viewer of The Next Generation, kick-starting a love of Star Trek which has persisted to the present day. Even if I’d played with that toy phaser a couple of years earlier, or watched parts of other episodes… The Royale is the one that turned me into a Trekkie. This is the moment I decided that Star Trek was something I needed to see more of; a TV show that I couldn’t put down and a world I wanted desperately to explore. Is it a great episode in its own right, or one of the best offerings in the franchise? Arguably not – though I’m afraid the rose-tinted glasses of nostalgia rather blind me to that! But it’s a special episode for me personally, as it marks the moment when I fully joined the Star Trek fan community.

Photo of William Shatner, Gene Roddenberry, and Patrick Stewart at an event
William Shatner, Gene Roddenberry, and Patrick Stewart, circa 1990-91.

At this moment in the early summer of 1991, I’d have been finishing Year 3 at school (which I believe is the equivalent of second grade in Ameria; not sure on that, though). My memory isn’t great these days, but I can remember some of the things I experienced that year. Year 3 marked the beginning of being in the “Juniors” at school, not the “Infants” with the younger year groups. It was around this time that I got my first taste of computing – at my small school in the rural north of England, there was only one computer, and it was in the Juniors classroom! I can remember sitting with another pupil – an older girl – as I had my first-ever lesson on a BBC Micro. I looked down at the keyboard and told the girl, with some alarm, that I wanted to use “little letters, not big letters” (meaning lowercase, not uppercase) and listened as she explained to me that the keyboard could write *both* sets of letters!

At home, we didn’t have a computer. My household had a landline telephone, a single television set, and a Betamax recorder that my parents would begrudgingly swap for VHS later in ’91. And we didn’t own a games console, either – although I’d played games before, at a kids’ club and at my uncle’s place, I wouldn’t get my first games console for another year. I finally got a Super Nintendo in the summer of 1992.

Stock photo of a Sony Betamax recorder
A Betamax recorder, similar to the one my parents owned in June 1991.

Sorry, this is turning into a stumble down memory lane, isn’t it?

But I suppose that’s a testament to the power of media. When I re-watched The Royale, I wasn’t just revisiting the episode and its story. I was stepping back in time to the moment I became a Star Trek fan, and that brings with it a certain amount of reflection. The world has changed a lot since that episode premiered here in the UK some thirty-five years ago. In fact, it’s almost unrecognisable in some ways. If I could magically teleport through time and sit down with my eight-year-old self, they’d be *stunned* to hear about some of the things that happened in the intervening years. And probably a little shocked at my appearance, too!

My point is that this episode holds a very special – and an utterly unique – place in my heart. Returning to it is always fun, but when I started to put pen to paper to write about it, I found myself wallowing in memories. Because this episode made me a Trekkie, I can’t help thinking back to that time in my life and reflecting on all of the things that have changed. Returning to The Royale today, on the thirty-fifth anniversary of its UK premiere, is something I’ve been looking forward to! I guess I just didn’t expect to take such a diversion back to my own past and my own schooldays.

Behind-the-scenes photo from Star Trek TNG showing the empty bridge set
A behind-the-scenes photo of the bridge of the Enterprise-D.

Season 2 of The Next Generation coined the phrase “growing the beard;” the opposite of “jumping the shark.” This phrase means, in brief, that a television show has improved significantly after a rougher first season, and references Jonathan Frakes’ character of Will Riker, who first got his iconic beard this year. While I don’t agree at all with the sentiment that Season 1 of TNG is somehow “bad” in its entirety, I think it’s fair to say that the show went from strength to strength, growing into something better over time.

And it’s that moment that I joined in and became a Star Trek fan. That can’t be a coincidence, can it? In fairness, I’ve always wondered what I might’ve made of Star Trek if, at this seminal moment, I’d have watched an episode like Angel One, or a similar lowly-rated story from Season 1. Would I have persevered with Star Trek, or written it off? I suppose we’ll never know… but it’s an interesting “what if” idea, isn’t it?

Two side-by-side still frames from Star Trek TNG S1 and S2 showing Riker
Riker in Season 1 (left) and Season 2 (right).

If you’ve made it this far, thanks! I think we’re finally ready to get into The Royale and its story.

The Royale aired at the midpoint of The Next Generation’s second season, in between Contagion and Time Squared. It was broadcast in the United States more than two years ahead of its UK premiere, in March 1989, and was written by Tracy Tormé and directed by Cliff Bole. Bole had previously worked on William Shatner’s police show T. J. Hooker, and had directed three episodes of TNG’s first season, including the penultimate episode, Conspiracy. He’d go on to direct almost two dozen more, as well as seven episodes of Deep Space Nine and ten of Voyager.

Tracy Tormé, the episode’s writer, is credited under a pseudonym for The Royale, as a result of conflicts with Maurice Hurley, TNG’s head writer for Season 2; Hurley had made changes and revisions to Tormé’s original script for the episode. According to Chaos on the Bridge, William Shatner’s documentary about the making of The Next Generation, Tormé and Hurley regularly butted heads during Seasons 1 and 2, before Tormé ultimately left the series ahead of Season 3.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the Enterprise-D
The opening shot of the episode.

According to director Cliff Bole, The Royale suffered from having a low budget. The revolving door leading into the hotel – and, really, the entire surface of Theta VIII outside of the hotel – is, to be incredibly generous, “minimalist!” Even the remastered version of the episode doesn’t change this (for which I’m actually glad), but I think there’s a weird kind of low-budget charm to the way the planet and away mission are presented. It’s kind of like The Original Series with its papier-mache and polystyrene rocks; something about that, while objectively unrealistic in its appearance, just… “feels like Star Trek,” or at least it does to me!

Tracy Tormé has said that his original draft was much more surreal, and from what I can glean, it sounds like it might’ve been closer to The Original Series in tone, perhaps with more of a focus on comedy or even outright silliness. Allegedly, this version of the story was felt to be too similar to A Piece of the Action from TOS; both stories involve an alien society contaminated by a book from Earth, and both had gangsters in them. That version of the episode may have been a lot funnier… or it could’ve been a lot worse, but I suppose we’ll never know, eh?

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing a revolving door
A very minimalist set…

The episode begins with the Enterprise-D arriving at Theta VIII, and a brief discussion between Riker and Geordi about the planet. This sets up Theta VIII as an inhospitable place; a freezing planet with high winds and ammonia tornadoes. It’s a cute little conversation, and I like the shot of Riker on the bridge, moving from the front, near the helm and conn positions, to Geordi’s station at the back. It’s not something we’d see a lot of across the show, this kind of panning shot, following a command character as they move between stations.

It’s also a bit of a rarity to see Geordi on the bridge after Season 1, and I think this moment worked a lot better than if, say, Riker had called down to Engineering. Having the two together, with Riker looking over Geordi’s shoulder for the chat, just felt a bit more personal and familiar, adding to the sense that these two are friends as well as colleagues. Not a huge moment in the episode, considering what’s to come – but I still really like it!

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Riker and Geordi
Riker with Geordi on the bridge.

Riker’s conversation with Picard in the Ready-Room has drawn a lot of attention over the years, but not for the reasons the writer may have wanted! Picard talks about Fermat’s last theorem, which was a famously unsolved problem in mathematics, and uses it as an example of how much Starfleet and the Federation still have to learn about the universe. This point is interesting, and it establishes a couple of things about Picard: that he spends his downtime thinking about puzzles like this, and that he’s keenly aware of how far humanity still has to go to uncover the mysteries of the universe. It neatly encapsulates who Picard is, why he’d join an organisation like Starfleet – and why, all these years later, he’s a character that so many of us absolutely adore!

But this moment has been overshadowed somewhat by the solution to Fermat’s last theorem! Only a few years after The Royale aired, mathematician Andrew Wiles published his proof, rendering Picard’s statement inaccurate. And some fans and viewers hold up this moment not as Picard being philosophical about Starfleet’s mission of exploration… but rather, as an example of how Star Trek’s vision of the future can be invalidated as the world around it shifts. I don’t really like that approach, and while we can look back at this scene now, with the benefit of hindsight, and acknowledge that, factually speaking, Picard is now incorrect to say that Fermat’s last theorem was never solved… I think his point still stands! And it feels a little pedantic for folks to seize on this moment as a kind of “gotcha” to say that Star Trek gets its vision of the future wrong. Star Trek, for me anyway, kind of exists in a floating timeline, and while we wouldn’t make an episode today using Fermat’s last theorem in this way, the point Picard was making about how humanity still has a long way to go to understand the universe isn’t invalidated. It’s interesting, though, that the proof was published only a few years after the episode aired.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Riker and Picard
This discussion of Fermat’s last theorem is interesting.

The teaser ends with the revelation that the debris detected in orbit of Theta VIII is from a NASA spacecraft. I like the little scene in the transporter room, and it’s always fun to see Chief O’Brien prior to his role in Deep Space Nine! However, I can’t help but feel like this moment – which is treated as a huge revelation by the episode – doesn’t quite make sense if you stop to think about it. Why wouldn’t either the Klingon cruiser or the Enterprise-D have been able to detect that the debris was of Earth origin? And given how much random junk and debris there must be in space, why would the Enterprise-D have diverted here just for that? Would the episode have been a bit more solid if it began with the message from the Klingons saying that they’d detected the wreck of an Earth spacecraft in orbit of Theta VIII?

I think this is an example of the passage of time – and the fact that I’ve seen this episode so many times over the years – getting in the way! The “big reveal” of the NASA emblem doesn’t shock me any more, and it hasn’t since I was eight years old and I first saw the episode! But that isn’t The Royale’s fault, and thinking about the mystery that the episode wants to establish going into the ad break… it’s done pretty well. I just get the sense that, if you think about it from an in-universe point of view, the Enterprise-D wouldn’t have necessarily diverted to Theta VIII for no reason, and the Klingons probably wouldn’t have even mentioned the debris unless they knew it was of human origin. Changing that would’ve completely ruined the shock of seeing the NASA emblem and American flag, but I’d still argue it would make more sense in-universe for the crew to have deliberately set out to recover the debris of a ship from Earth, rather than diverting the entire ship to take a look at some random space junk.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing O'Brien and Riker with the NASA debris
O’Brien and Riker with the recovered debris.

In the Conference Room, the crew briefly discuss what they’ve found. The damage to the debris could indicate it was hit by weapons fire, and Picard states that there’s no way a vessel from the mid-21st Century could have travelled so far into deep space. I think it’s fun to see, now we’re almost forty years on from The Next Generation’s premiere, how the show, especially in its first couple of seasons, was trying to remain consistent with The Original Series and its vision of Earth in the late 20th and early 21st Centuries. Encounter at Farpoint showed us the aftermath of World War III and the “post-atomic horror,” and now we’re getting NASA spacecraft from that same kind of era venturing beyond the solar system.

As we get closer to some of these dates and moments in real-time, we can see how wrong those depictions were! And that’s kind of sad, in a way. But speaking as we were of Star Trek having a kind of “floating timeline,” where events in the real world can ultimately overwrite some of these ideas… I don’t think it really matters all that much. If you look at Star Trek episodes produced in the 2020s, they might not reference the “mid-21st Century” in quite the same way, but Star Trek’s internal timeline is, for me, vague enough to still come together! And my personal head canon, anyway, is that Star Trek diverged from the real world at some point in the mid/late 20th Century! But I think we’ve gotten a little off-topic, huh?

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Data and Picard
Data and Picard in the Conference Room.

I love the handheld phasers that the crew use for the away mission. A lot of phaser designs feel “iconic,” but something about the models used in the first part of The Next Generation just feels even more special, somehow. Perhaps that’s the nostalgia talking again! This model, lovingly referred to as the “dustbuster” after a handheld vacuum cleaner that it resembles, was seen on a few occasions across Seasons 1 and 2, but was changed by Season 3.

To get back on topic, Wesley and Geordi show Picard and the others a “structure” that they’ve detected on the surface of Theta VIII. And here’s where I feel like the script and the production didn’t quite align! This structure, briefly glimpsed on Wesley’s monitor, is simply never shown at all; the away team beams down to a black void with a simple revolving door set into it, and the exterior of the hotel is simply never seen, nor even acknowledged. This is clearly a consequence of the budget issues we talked about, and I happen to find the black void and simple door to be suitably mysterious and otherworldly, especially for the kind of story the episode is setting up. But it’s also a bit of an inconsistency, if you think about it, and it makes me wonder why they didn’t rework this moment on the bridge to perhaps make note of a pocket of breathable air, but not draw attention to the existence of a “structure” that we never get to see.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing an LCARS scan
We never actually get to see what this structure looks like.

The away team beams down to Theta VIII, and they encounter the revolving door! One thing I didn’t realise until looking into the production history of The Royale is that all of the sets for the hotel were constructed specifically for The Next Generation – they didn’t use an existing hotel or casino set, which is genuinely fascinating. I guess it must’ve been cheaper to do that than to try to book an existing location or reuse a set from another series, but… how?

Director Cliff Bole, who had previously worked on a crime drama called Vegas, described the set as being built with “curtains,” and recalled that whole scenes needed to be shot from very specific angles so as not to give the game away! The moment the away team walks into the hotel for the first time, though, doesn’t feel – to me, anyway – like actors walking onto a set. The number of people in frame, as well as the score and sound design, too, make the hotel’s casino feel like a very real – if mysterious and otherworldly – space.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the casino
The casino.

The interaction with the assistant manager at the hotel’s front desk is still, all these years later, absolutely hilarious. Sam Anderson, the actor who took on the role, has absolutely perfect comedic timing, especially in this first encounter. As Riker and Worf push him on what the planet’s called… I can’t help but laugh every single time, no matter how many times I’ve seen The Royale.

Anderson would go on to have roles in films like Forrest Gump and TV shows like ER and Lost.

There’s a creepiness to this interaction, making us think that the assistant manager is hiding things or refusing to share everything he knows about the hotel or the planet it’s situated on, and that successfully builds up more of the mystery that The Royale is going for.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the assistant manager
The assistant manager.

It’s also at this moment that we get the first signs of the episode’s other angle: the cheap story from a low-quality novel. Playing out like a tired cliché of the crime and drama genres, the hotel’s bellboy interrupts the away team to talk to the assistant manager about a girl. And the soundtrack here! It’s just pitch-perfect for this kind of over-the-top drama cliché; exactly the kind of thing you’d have heard in a B-movie or TV soap opera. The dramatic change in music adds so much to this scene, indicating to us as the audience that there’s something very strange going on. I love it!

This leads into the revelation that none of the people the away team has encountered are emitting life-signs. And this gets a little confusing; Data explains that they exist, but that they aren’t organic, nor are they machines. Again, the mysteries of the story are deepening. And we get a fun introduction to the character “Texas” to round things off.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the away team
The away team scanning for life-forms.

We get a brief scene back aboard the Enterprise-D with Wesley and Geordi still working on a way to break through the communications blackout. Picard talks to them, wondering whether something intelligent may be blocking their signal, and then hears from Counsellor Troi that Riker doesn’t appear to be in danger; she describes his mood as “amused,” which obviously tracks with what we just saw! This little scene on the bridge doesn’t add a lot, but it’s a fun little cutaway in its own right.

I think it might’ve been interesting for Picard to ask Troi, rather than Wesley and Geordi, whether there was some kind of intelligence or life-form at work here. Surely she’d be able to tell whether there was anyone else down there besides the away team, and that could’ve impacted how the crew were reacting to the situation. Deanna’s empathic abilities are not always perfect, of course, but she might’ve been able to join in this conversation and share her perspective, at least. Again, a nitpick – but it’s a role we’ve seen Troi fill multiple times already, even at this point in the show’s run, commenting on the likes of Q or the Ferengi, to name but two examples. So I don’t think it’s out of the question for Picard to have asked her if she could feel another presence down on Theta VIII.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Picard and Troi
Why doesn’t Captain Picard ask Counsellor Troi if she can sense another intelligence or presence down on the planet?

The blackjack scene with “Texas” is funny. Noble Willingham, the actor who played the role, would later go on to have a starring role in Walker, Texas Ranger with Chuck Norris, and he just feels perfectly cast as the old gambler in The Royale. He reminds me of The Simpsons’ character of the Rich Texan, thanks to a similar outfit, accent, and mannerisms, and I just think he’s a really fun and pretty unique character across really the entirety of Star Trek. He fits perfectly into this pulpy, low-quality novel, but there’s an edge to the character, too.

We get some genuinely cute moments with Texas and Data – Texas gives him his stetson hat to wear, briefly, and tries to talk him out of asking for another card during the game. I’m not a gambler, and I’m not all that familiar with blackjack as a game, but its rules are simple enough to understand – and Data explains them well – meaning it makes for a good choice of game to show off in a scene like this. Trying to explain the rules of a more complex game would’ve taken too long and could’ve been confusing or just less engaging for the audience.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing "Texas"
“Texas.”

After another short scene on the bridge, it soon becomes clear to the away team that they’re trapped in the hotel. The scene of the three of them running through the revolving door is a little silly, to be honest; they’re clearly just going all the way around and coming back out into the hotel, and it makes for a kind of comical presentation which contrasts with how seriously all three characters are taking it! But it does well enough to establish the core premise: they’re stuck in the hotel, unable to leave, and also cut off from communicating with the Enterprise.

The Royale always reminded me a little of The Eagles’ song Hotel California. Remember the line “you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave”? Isn’t that pretty much the premise of the story here, that escaping the hotel is impossible? I’ve never seen other Trekkies making that link, though, so maybe that’s just a me thing! And the song isn’t *literally* about a magically inescapable hotel, it’s a metaphor. Still, I find the comparison to be a fun one.

A behind-the-scenes photo from Star Trek TNG S2 showing Brent Spiner
Behind-the-scenes during production.

Riker attempts to talk to the assistant manager again, but makes no progress in figuring out how to leave the hotel. The Enterprise-D is able to briefly get in contact with Riker, but only long enough for him to tell Picard that they can’t leave the building. We get another scene with the bellboy and the assistant manager, with that absolutely wonderful scene-setting score again! And I just really love this incredibly cheesy story that’s unfolding at the hotel; it’s so silly, but it’s so… *Star Trek* at the same time.

Maybe you won’t agree, but I think The Royale is the kind of episode that modern Star Trek wouldn’t do. We’ve seen recent episodes involving time travel, including to the modern day, as well as stories involving aliens capable of generating illusions not dissimilar to the hotel in The Royale. But this kind of self-contained story – an alien recreation of a low-budget Las Vegas hotel, based on a book, and complete with one-dimensional characters played with self-awareness by the performers? I mean… would modern Star Trek do something like that? I doubt it… but it’s episodes like this one that make Star Trek what it is, at least to me. Recent stories all seem to be galactic in scope, with existential threats to the entire Federation and moustache-twirling villains who are played completely earnestly. The Royale is totally aware of the kind of books and TV shows it’s parodying, and I think that self-awareness is a big part of how well it works.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the bellboy
The bellboy with his gun.

After a cute moment with Worf at the “turbolift,” the action moves to one of the hotel’s upper floors – and it’s here that the mystery begins to be explained. The away team reaches one of the hotel’s rooms, where Data’s detected “human DNA,” and they uncover the body of one of the NASA astronauts.

For a Star Trek episode, on a relatively low budget, produced in the late ’80s… the prop of the skeletonised astronaut is actually really good! At least, I think it is. It manages to feel old, decrepit, mouldy, and like it’s been there for centuries, and the reveal, I’m certain, would have shocked me when I first saw the episode all those years ago. It’s a well-executed moment, suitably creepy and intense for a mystery story, and it sees The Royale take a surprisingly dark twist. Yes, the away team has been trapped for a while, and yes, we know that, back on the ship, there are problems with communication. But this is the first time, really, after meeting some fairly whimsical characters and seeing a cheesy side-story right out of a mid-century soap opera, that the crew feels in danger. And if this prop had looked a lot worse… well, that feeling wouldn’t have been as strong.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing a skeleton
The skeleton.

Worf’s comment about how dying in one’s sleep is “terrible” didn’t pass unnoticed – a subtle nod to how Klingons view such things. He then goes on to uncover the dead man’s NASA flight suit as Data explains that the astronaut – Colonel Richey – has been dead for almost three centuries. The Enterprise is able to get back in touch at this point, conveniently allowing Riker to ask them to search for details of Colonel Richey’s identity, while Worf uncovers the novel Hotel Royale – a ficticious book created for this episode.

I like the flight suit, and how it feels comparable to NASA’s spacesuits of the Space Shuttle era. Riker’s comment about the 52-star American flag indicating a time period was also interesting; it continues Star Trek’s theme of depicting a positive future for the United States in particular! I wonder which two new states those stars are meant to represent? Puerto Rico, perhaps, and Washington, DC? Those are the two most-likely candidates for statehood right now, I believe!

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the flight suit
The flight suit with its flag and mission patches.

As an aside, the remastered version of the episode contains one major difference from the original, and it’s at this moment. The original mission patch on Colonel Richey’s flight suit was much more basic; an Apollo 17 patch with the name scrubbed off. The remaster updates this, giving the patch a unique design, which I think looks a lot better – and certainly feels a bit more realistic for a mission of this type. It’s only seen briefly, but it is seen in close-up, so I definitely think it was worth updating it when The Next Generation went through the remastering process a few years ago.

After Worf discovers the novel Hotel Royale, Riker hands the book to Data to summarise it. And I’ve always loved seeing Data do these superhuman feats – reading an entire book in seconds, as in this case, just makes him feel like a unique character with special abilities. Data proceeds to explain, in brief, the plot of the book to Captain Picard and the away team, and they realise that the characters in the book are some of the people we’ve been seeing downstairs. It was a bit of a heavy-handed approach to have the characters say, out loud, things that we could’ve easily understood for ourselves, but that’s my only real criticism of this scene.

Pair of still frames from Star Trek TNG S2 The Royale showing Data explaining the novel
Data explains the plot of the book (left) while Picard and the crew listen.

Things take a darker turn again when Worf and Riker uncover the colonel’s diary. Somehow (and it isn’t explained how, sadly), Colonel Richey pieced together that the illusory hotel was concocted by an alien that he claims was aboard his ship and killed his crewmates. The alien (or aliens), out of a sense of guilt, built the hotel for him and allowed him to live there. He then spent the next thirty-eight years trapped in the Hotel Royale, before passing away.

So now we know why the hotel exists on this barren, otherwise lifeless world! The mystery has been at least partially solved, and with the exception of a bit of heavy-handedness in some of the dialogue, this worked pretty well. The mystery connects to Star Trek’s fictionalised past – the 21st Century – and to a race of aliens who appear to have inadvertently caused the deaths of the other NASA crew. And the book being misinterpreted as a kind of almost religious text by the aliens would be funny… if it wasn’t so dark. Colonel Richey’s final words, that he would “welcome death,” really hammer home that much darker tone for this aspect of the story.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Data and Riker
Data and Riker with the diary.

The next scene aboard the Enterprise gives us Dr Pulaski’s only lines in the episode. The crew come up with a plan – spearheaded by Geordi – to “slice” into the forcefield around the hotel, even though doing so would cause the frozen atmosphere of Theta VIII to rush in. If the away team couldn’t be beamed out in time, Dr Pulaski opines that, in theory, they could be resuscitated after being flash-frozen.

I like Dr Pulaski, and one of my biggest Star Trek “what-if” questions is what The Next Generation and the rest of the franchise might’ve looked like had she stuck around. Her role in The Royale is relatively minor, but I daresay it’s no coincidence that her presence in the first episodes I can remember watching is a big part of why I find her to be such a fascinating character. Dr Crusher’s return in Season 3 was welcomed by fans (and the cast) at the time, of course, and we’ve since seen different things from her. But Dr Pulaski is a unique character; her conflicts with characters like Data and her occasionally standoffish manner contrast in a fun way with other members of the crew.

If you’re interested to read more about Dr Pulaski, click or tap here to check out my thoughts on her character.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Dr Pulaski
Dr Pulaski doesn’t play a big role in this episode.

As the away team splits up, Picard and Counsellor Troi begin to look over the text of Hotel Royale. I absolutely *adore* Picard’s disgusted expression on reading the opening line: “It was a dark and stormy night.” Somehow, that line has become a byword for poor-quality writing, often criticised and parodied, and its use here really emphasises the low-quality nature of this fictitious book. Picard, who had been discussing complex mathematics and high-brow philosophy with Riker at the start of the episode, is forced to engage with a text he clearly detests – and it’s kind of funny.

Back on the casino floor, Data attempts to get “Texas” to leave the hotel, surmising that he may be trapped within its walls, too. But the blackjack game is still going, and Texas shows off a much creepier side, as he tries to leverage Vanessa’s losing streak to… well, you can figure out the rest. It’s a turn for this previously comedic character to end up looking controlling, manipulative, sexually aggressive, and creepy, but it fits with the tone of the kind of novel Hotel Royale purports to be.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Vanessa and "Texas"
Vanessa and Texas.

As Riker and Worf reconvene to share that they found “nothing” of consequence to aid in their escape, we get another of the pulpy scenes with the bellhop. It starts with the assistant manager, as the TV drama-style music swells, and leads into the arrival of Mickey D: the gangster at the heart of the novel.

The only part about this I didn’t really like was the action cutting between the planet and Picard, in his Ready-Room, who could apparently hear everything going on through the comm channel. Picard, for me, didn’t seem to take it as seriously as he perhaps should’ve; in-universe, the characters don’t know how dangerous the situation is, and we know that even holograms can kill if they malfunction. There’s no reason to assume that, just because this is a low-quality story, Riker and the away team will be safe – Mickey D could, perhaps, have harmed them if they’d got caught up in the middle of it. It was just a bit… tonally weird, I suppose. And cutting away from the actual scene to watch someone listening to it, only to make yet another comment on the quality of the writing? It just didn’t add a lot to the episode.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Mickey D
Mickey D arrives.

The conflict between Mickey D and the bellboy, over a girl named Rita, escalates, despite the assistant manager’s attempts to defuse the situation, and the two seem to be heading outside for a confrontation. However, Mickey D shoots the bellboy in the back, quips about Rita not being worth dying over, and then departs.

Mickey D is a completely one-dimensional character – but in a self-aware way. He’s a typical “Vegas gangster” of this time period, with his mannerisms, style of dress, and everything made out to emphasise that. His one big action – shooting a young man in the back – also hammers home that this is a man who doesn’t play fair. I’d never say he’s a great or even good character (he gets far too little screen time for that), but he fills a role in this story in a way that makes sense, and he advances the plot both within Hotel Royale’s fictional story, and for the away team down on Theta VIII. They witness the shooting (complete with over-acting and no visible injuries or wounds), and that kick-starts the final act of the episode.

A behind-the-scenes photo from Star Trek TNG S2 showing Michael Dorn and a guest star
Michael Dorn (right) with guest star Leo Garcia, who played the bellboy.

Riker and Worf watch Mickey D walking out of the hotel, surprised that he’s able to leave while they remain trapped. This leads to a conversation with Captain Picard, who recounts the scene from the book. Riker then asks how the book ends – and after learning that “foreign investors” buy out the hotel, he comes up with a plan for the away team to *become* the foreign investors. This was hinted at, by the way, in their first interaction with the assistant manager shortly after their arrival.

One thing that’s great about this moment is how the typical TNG music sting starts to play, then blends into the TV drama jazz music that had defined the scenes recounting the pulpy Hotel Royale story. I just think it’s really creative; a way to kind of symbolise that these two disconnected halves of the episode’s story are going to come together. And, for the first time since arriving, Riker and the away team now have a plan to get back to the Enterprise-D.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Worf and Riker
The music swells… and Riker is a man with a plan.

The away team re-encounters “Texas” and Vanessa, this time at the craps table, and begin their scheme to win enough money gambling to buy out the hotel and finish the story, hopefully allowing them to escape. Data’s unique skillset once again proves invaluable; he’s able to “fix” the dice to make sure they win, much to Texas and Vanessa’s enjoyment.

We get a tiny sub-plot with “Texas” trying to bet against Data, and taking it personally when he loses. It was of some interest, especially given his earlier creepy behaviour, and seeing him taken down a few pegs is definitely satisfying. But he isn’t a major antagonist, and this feels like little more than a minor stumbling-block on the way to finishing the story.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing a craps game
The craps game.

What I love about this sequence is how into character both Data and Riker get. Data adopts mid-century gambling mannerisms and terminology, despite not quite understanding all of it, and his line “baby needs a new pair of shoes” is delivered in a totally deadpan way that *only* Brent Spiner could ever manage! It’s really funny, really cute, and it’s one of the many reasons why I fell in love with Data way back when. He’s just such a fun, charming character, and every time he tries act “more human” he does it so earnestly and in such a fun way that it’s impossible not to root for him.

You know the rest of the story: thanks to Data’s interference, they win over and over at craps, breaking the bank in the process. They then announce they’re buying the hotel, to the surprise and gratitude of the assistant manager, and spread the rest of their winnings around. Even “Texas” gets to benefit, remaining at the craps table with Data’s loaded dice.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the assistant manager
The assistant manager realises who he’s dealing with.

I think we’re meant to understand that, because the away team was believed to be the trio of “foreign investors,” they couldn’t leave the hotel until they’d completed their role in the story. Whether Colonel Richey was also assigned that role by the aliens who created the illusion isn’t clear, though, and the episode ends with the core mystery solved – but still some unanswered questions.

Back in the Ready-Room, Picard and Riker recall Fermat’s last theorem, and suggest that some of the mysteries of Colonel Richey’s story, and the hotel on Theta VIII, may simply never be solved. And while that may seem unsatisfying (which, in a way, it is), it’s also an interesting take on space exploration and Starfleet’s mission, isn’t it? We’re used to our heroes turning up at a planet, solving a puzzle or unravelling every aspect of a mystery, and warping away to a new adventure. But space… well, it isn’t always easy to understand. Who were these aliens? Why did they choose that book for Colonel Richey? What went wrong in their encounter with humanity – and what were they even trying to do? Why strand Colonel Richey on Theta VIII – is the planet their homeworld? Why not attempt to make contact with the Enterprise-D if that’s the case? So many questions left unanswered… but the lack of an answer is kind of the point.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing Picard
Picard and Riker are left with unanswered questions as the Enterprise prepares to leave orbit.

So that was The Royale! Thanks for joining me on this re-watch of the episode.

I had a blast stepping back in time some thirty-five years to the episode that first turned me into a Trekkie, and I hope it was a bit of fun to come along for the ride with me. I adore this story, despite its low-budget sets, hammy acting, and kind of silly premise – and I hope that came across! As a kid, I was absolutely transfixed by this story, and desperately keen to go on more adventures with Riker, Data, Worf, and the rest of the crew of the Enterprise-D. From this moment on, I was a regular viewer of The Next Generation, watching the rest of Season 2, then Season 3, and going back to earlier episodes from Season 1 when they were re-broadcast.

Star Trek became a pretty big part of my life from then on. As I navigated school and social life, and especially as I grew into adolescence and attended seondary school, it became both a source of joy and, sometimes, an escape from the real world. I loved going on these adventures with the crew, and when TNG’s two spin-offs (Deep Space Nine and Voyager) came to the UK, I watched those religiously, too. And I may never have started to do so were it not for The Royale.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the Enterprise-D and Theta VIII
The Enterprise-D in orbit of Theta VIII.

In Star Trek’s big sixtieth anniversary year, I thought it was fun to return to my own origins as a Trekkie, and with today being the thirty-fifth anniversary of The Royale’s UK premiere… well, it all just sort of fell into place!

It’s impossible for me to be in any way “objective” when dealing with an episode like this, so I hope that didn’t impact your enjoyment of this re-watch. I wanted to go back to The Royale not to criticise it or pick it apart – though I daresay there’s been some of that – but really to celebrate what it means to me personally, and to my journey into the Star Trek fan community. Hopefully that positivity came across, anyway.

It’s been a long time since June 1991, and a lot has changed. But my love of Star Trek – and of The Royale – hasn’t diminished. Star Trek has been a near-constant presence in my life since this moment, even when new episodes and films weren’t being aired, and without it… well, I probably wouldn’t be here running a small website! I really don’t know where I’d be without this wonderful franchise, to tell you the truth.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG The Royale showing the away team beaming out
The away team beams back to the ship.

If you liked this format and want more re-watches of older Star Trek episodes, I have several here on the website. My most recent was Where No Man Has Gone BeforeThe Original Series’ second pilot. You can find that piece by clicking or tapping here. Earlier this year, I also took a look at The First Duty from The Next Generation’s fifth season. Click or tap here to check that out. And if you visit my dedicated The Next Generation webpage, you can find all of my commentary and other TNG episode re-watches. Click or tap here to head there.

Later this year, we’ve got Strange New Worlds’ fourth season to come, and I plan to write episode reviews for that, so I hope you’ll join me for some of those. And as the sixtieth anniversary gets closer, I have a few other ideas for articles and episode re-watches that I hope I’ll be able to find time for.

Thanks for reading, and as always… Live Long and Prosper, friends!


Star Trek: The Next Generation is available to stream now on Paramount+ in countries and territories where the service is available, and is also available to buy on DVD/Blu-ray. The Star Trek franchise – including The Next Generation and all other properties discussed above – is the copyright of Skydance/Paramount. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.

The Star Trek Fan Community’s Worst Theories

A Star Trek-themed spoiler warning.

Spoiler Warning: There are spoilers ahead for practically the entire Star Trek franchise, including recent seasons of Picard, Strange New Worlds, and Starfleet Academy.

I like to engage in a bit of theory-crafting here on the website! If you’re a regular reader, you might’ve followed along with my weekly Discovery and Picard theories while those shows were on the air. Or perhaps you clicked on one of my viral theories speculating about Unknown Species 10-C, Q, or Vadic. Or maybe you’re brand-new to Trekking with Dennis… in which case, welcome! But my point is that I like Star Trek fan theories, I write a lot of Star Trek fan theories, and I get a *lot* of things utterly wrong.

I give that caveat for one important reason: this piece, in which I’m going to demolish some fan theories that I’ve found doing the rounds in the online Trekkie community, is meant to be tongue-in-cheek! I’m trying to have a bit of fun with the Star Trek franchise in this landmark sixtieth anniversary year, and picking apart some fan theories I’ve come across on social media seemed like it could be a way to do that. But I’m not taking this too seriously, and you only need look at my own fan theories to see how bad some of them were.

Cropped promo poster for The Search for SquarePants (in a Star Trek style).
Brace yourself. Things are about to get… silly.

More than ever, I encourage you to keep in mind that this is entirely *subjective, not objective*, and that we’re dealing with non-canonical fan theories which are likely never to be confirmed nor even referenced on screen. This is just for fun, it’s supposed to be a light-hearted exploration of some of the Trekkie community’s “wilder” and more “out there” ideas, and it’s just one person’s take on things, at the end of the day. So please try to keep all of that in mind as we go through these theories!

I visited a few different Star Trek social media pages and channels, collecting twenty-five theories that I thought sounded… well, to be blunt, I thought they sounded kinda silly. Some of these seem to have been written almost as parody, but others did seem to have elicited debate, and clearly have believers. But in any case, all of these made interesting (or weird) points, and I thought breaking them down could be a bit of fun as we continue our year-long celebration of the franchise’s sixtieth anniversary.

Screenshot from Star Trek: Generations (PC game) showing the Enterprise-D firing phasers.
The Enterprise-D. Bonus points if you know where this image comes from!

These theories cover all kinds of topics, and span the breadth of Star Trek’s history, from The Original Series all the way through to some of the most recent episodes of Starfleet Academy. Some fans have been, shall we say, especially *creative* with their ideas! Which is fantastic. I adore the Star Trek fan community and how passionate folks can be. As I’ve said many times here on the website: crafting a theory is a great excuse to spend a bit more time in Star Trek’s wonderful galaxy, and even though I may disagree vehemently with a theory, I love that Trekkies all over the world are so invested in this franchise.

We’re going to get into the theories now, so consider this your final content warning. This is your last chance to jump ship if you need to avoid spoilers or if you don’t want to come across some potentially controversial Star Trek opinions! The theories below are in no particular order.

Theory #1:
Dr McCoy knows that he’s a character in a TV show.

Still frame from Star Trek: The Original Series Journey to Babel showing Dr McCoy.
Leonard “Bones” McCoy.

In The Original Series, there were a handful of moments that seemed to break the fourth wall – i.e. where characters within Star Trek seemed to acknowledge the audience, or that what was unfolding on screen might not be real. Dr McCoy was a key part of one of the most (in)famous fourth wall breaks in The Original Series: the closing scene of the Season 2 episode Journey to Babel. In this scene, Dr McCoy remarks that he “finally got the last word,” after shushing Kirk and Spock – seemingly referencing other episode endings in which Kirk, Spock, or another character would say the closing line or remark on what had transpired. Furthermore, McCoy seems to say this while looking *almost* straight into the camera.

Without getting too nitpicky, I think we can debunk this one by explaining that McCoy was simply commenting on Kirk and Spock’s tendency to talk over him in-universe, rather than anything more meta! And the choice of camera angle, rather than hinting at McCoy somehow being self-aware, was merely a close-up. The Original Series did close-up shots like that all the time, and McCoy’s gaze is slightly off to one side, not straight down the lens. There’s nothing in canon to suggest that Dr McCoy is somehow self-aware of his status as a character, and anything that hints otherwise can be written off as a quirk of the show’s production or writing.

Theory #2:
The show T.J. Hooker depicts Kirk’s adventures on a holodeck.

Poster/box art for T.J. Hooker.
It’s Captain Kirk!

T.J. Hooker stars William Shatner in the lead role, and if you don’t know it, it’s a police procedural show from the ’80s. Besides Shatner’s role, Leonard Nimoy had a small role in one episode (and directed another), and James Darren (DS9′s Vic Fontaine) was a regular character. The series was in production alongside three Star Trek films – The Wrath of Khan, The Search for Spock, and The Voyage Home. But… that’s it. There are no overt references to Star Trek in T.J. Hooker, nor to T.J. Hooker anywhere in Star Trek – at least, not that I can recall.

If fans want to watch the show and make this inference… I mean, there’s nothing stopping you anymore. A few years ago, I might’ve said that the holodeck is a 24th Century creation, but Strange New Worlds has blown that theory out of the water. Holodecks clearly did exist at the time of The Wrath of Khan, and to be honest, I could see Kirk choosing to play make-believe as a cop in the ’80s. Obviously this isn’t and never will be canon… but don’t let that stop you!

Theory #3:
Borg “transwarp” is actually the mycelial network (from Discovery).

Still frame from Star Trek: Picard S1 showing the Artifact at transwarp.
A Borg Cube exiting a transwarp aperture into normal space.

I think we have enough context to fully debunk this one, right? Discovery’s mycelial network and Borg transwarp behave completely differently to one another, with the USS Discovery able to “jump” instantaneously to points across the galaxy, whereas Borg vessels enter a transwarp network and are accelerated to vast speeds. Borg transwarp is way quicker than warp speed and clearly allows for much faster transport than anything 24th or 25th Century Starfleet is capable of. But it lacks the instantaneous movement or the “jumping” effect of Discovery’s mycelial network. So I think that alone rules it out.

One thing that Star Trek’s writers usually do well is keep the intricacies of different technologies pretty vague. We know that dilithium crystals moderate the antimatter reaction in a warp core… but what that technobabble actually means, or how it all truly works, is a mystery. And you could argue that Borg transwarp is even more mysterious; just because no Borg character ever said the words “mycelial network” doesn’t mean they don’t have access to that technology. I will concede that it stands to reason that, if the mycelial network is a known phenomenon in the Star Trek galaxy, the Borg would be aware of it. But that doesn’t mean it’s how their transwarp network operates, and there are enough differences between how they appear on screen as to render this one null and void for me.

Theory #4:
Transporters beam out everyone’s bodily waste.

Star Trek art of a giant poo on a transporter pad.
Yuck.

Uh, sure… *that’s* what the Federation uses transporters for. Rather than going to the toilet, no one in the future is potty trained, and instead, transporters automatically empty everyone’s bladders and bowels every time they start to fill up. That’s why you never see a toilet aboard a starship, and why only the most oblique references are made to “waste extraction.”

But… this is just plain *silly*, isn’t it? “Waste extraction” was only ever mentioned in DS9, and only on a few occasions. There are few direct depictions of toilets in Star Trek, but there are references to them. Kirk sits on a toilet (clothed) in The Final Frontier, and Boimler says he dropped his tricorder in the toilet in Lower Decks. If we count non-canon sources, like starship blueprints, toilet facilities can be seen on a few different 23rd and 24th Century vessels, too. There are types of toilet today that don’t use water or a flushing system, and it’s conceivable that, in the future, refinements or brand-new designs could have been invented. Considering the energy cost, the number of transporters required, and the constant need to be in transporter range… I can’t see this being realistic. A fun, jokey idea? Sure. But something to take seriously? No!

Theory #5:
The USS Riker (from Starfleet Academy) is crewed entirely by Will Riker’s descendants.

(Cropped) still frame from Star Trek: Starfleet Academy S1 showing a Federation fleet.
One of these ships (probably the one on the far left) is the USS Riker.

The USS Riker has (at time of writing) appeared in one episode of Starfleet Academy – a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it cameo in Vox in Excelso. Someone online suggested that the Riker’s entire crew are the descendants of TNG’s Will Riker – famous, somewhat, for his womanising ways and romantic liaisons with a variety of different characters across the show’s seven-season run. Riker would later settle down with Deanna Troi, as we saw in Picard, and had two children – only one of whom survived to the dawn of the 25th Century.

But could Riker’s many flings and one-night stands across The Next Generation have led to more… offspring? This theory says so! And while I think it’s a cute joke within the fandom at the expense of how Riker was sometimes written, I don’t think it has an ounce of actual merit. Firstly, we don’t even know for sure that the USS Riker is named for *William* Riker and not some hypothetical other character. Riker’s father, Kyle, also worked for the Federation, the transporter clone known as Thomas may have survived the Dominion War, and Riker’s daughter may also have gone on to achieve something significant, just to give three examples of characters we know to exist. So… this cameo was cute, and appreciated by this old TNG fan. But the idea of a ship crewed entirely by the descendants of Riker’s various liaisons? Silly!

Theory #6:
Discord (from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic) is actually Q.

Still frame from My Little Pony: FiM S6 showing Discord.
Discord.

We could’ve done an entire article on *just* theories involving crossovers with other franchises, I guess! But this one really does make me smile, because it’s just so silly. I concede that Q and Discord have some pretty obvious similarities: their personalities, their penchant for trickery, and the fact that they’re both ancient beings who form a bond with a mortal protagonist. But c’mon, guys… these are two completely different franchises with very little in common, totally different target audiences, and which are owned by two competing corporations.

John de Lancie portrays both characters, which is where this idea seems to have originated, but that’s really as far as it can go. The same voice actor has found himself somewhat typecast into playing a role which may have been directly inspired by his earlier character. That’s it. Q can’t exist in a franchise where… Q doesn’t exist. It’s a fun head-canon, I guess, if you’re a fan of both universes. But there’s no way it can be anything more than that.

Theory #7:
Benny Russell is real, and Gene Roddenberry stole Star Trek from him.

Still frame from Star Trek: DS9 showing Sisko seeing Benny Russell.
Sisko sees a reflection of Benny Russell.

There are a few variants of this theory. Some posit that, in-universe, the episode Far Beyond the Stars suggests that Star Trek as a whole exists as a fictional creation. I don’t agree with that at all (it’s always seemed logical, to me, that Benny Russell is a vision from the Prophets and nothing more), but I don’t, like, viscerally *object* to fans subscribing to that idea or exploring it. But I have seen fans propose – I *hope* entirely in jest – that there was a real Benny Russell once upon a time, and Gene Roddenberry either got the idea for Star Trek from him… or stole it.

If this is a total joke, which I believe it is, then… I mean, sure. Humour is subjective, and just because I don’t personally find it all that funny… I’m not the joke police. I can’t imagine any Star Trek fan taking this idea seriously, though, because it implies that not only did Gene Roddenberry steal these stories and this world-building, but then the DS9 writers – who must’ve known or been in on it – created a fictionalised version of Benny Russell as a character in their show… for… reasons? As a “confession?” A fun joke, maybe, but not something to take seriously.

Theory #8:
Saavik and/or Tuvok are transgender (because of Vulcan naming customs).

Saavik and Tuvok (from Star Trek) on a rainbow background.
Saavik and Tuvok.

In The Original Series, every named Vulcan we met had a name beginning with S if they were male or T if they were female. But then, in The Wrath of Khan, we met Saavik – the first female Vulcan whose name begins with an S. Cue the fan theories! In short, this theory posits that, because of Vulcan naming conventions that were established in TOS, Saavik and Tuvok “must” be transgender. Saavik would be a trans woman and Tuvok a trans man.

Setting aside the silly premise for a moment, let’s think about this. There are some transgender folks who keep their birth name after transitioning, but it’s more common in the trans community to choose a name more befitting of one’s true gender. For Saavik and Tuvok to keep their deadnames wouldn’t make a lot of sense. Then there’s the fact that there’s absolutely no trans storytelling for either character… at all. In a way, you might say that’s great – that the Federation just accepts everyone and doesn’t make a big deal of it. But for a writer to introduce a character who is intended to be trans and then make no effort to tell a single trans or trans-adjacent story with them? And for fans to have to infer, years after the stories were first told, that these characters are meant to be trans? We’re hitting “Harry Potter” levels of fake inclusivity. If you find something relatable in Tuvok or Saavik as a trans person, I don’t wanna take that away from you. But it’s not how I read either character, and there are other explanations for their names.

Theory #9:
Star Trek V: The Final Frontier didn’t happen; it’s all just Kirk’s bad dream.

Three posters for Star Trek V: The Final Frontier.
Did it really happen?

Have you ever taken a creative writing class? One of the first things the teacher warns you about is the importance of avoiding tired narrative clichés… like “but it was all just a dream.” And to me, that’s how this fan theory comes across. I get that not everyone likes The Final Frontier; I personally rank it as one of the lesser Star Trek films, too. But just because it isn’t popular… that doesn’t mean its events can be scrubbed from canon altogether. Not to mention that the film does genuinely have redeeming features and moments of characterisation (like Kirk, Spock, and McCoy camping) that I wouldn’t want to lose.

This theory hinges on Kirk’s starring role, and the fact that some of his worst fears seem to come true. Sybok’s presence (and Spock never having mentioned him) seems to threaten their special bond. His ship is stolen from him. Members of his own crew turn against him. And there are discrepancies, like the number of decks the Enterprise-A seems to have, or the “Galaxy-class” feel to the ship (caused by recycling sets from The Next Generation). But to me, this one feels like wishful thinking at best… or clutching at the tiniest of straws at worst.

Theory #10:
Nick Locarno and Tom Paris are the same person.

Promo photo for Star Trek: Voyager showing Tom Paris.
Tom Paris… or should that be Nick Locarno?

I think it’s safe to say that Lower Decks has debunked this one (though I still need to get caught up on that show!) But before Locarno made a return to Star Trek, fans speculated that “Nick Locarno” was actually a pseudonym adopted by Tom Paris prior to enrolling in Starfleet Academy. The theory went that Paris wanted to keep his connection to his father (who is a senior officer) a secret – either to be judged on his own merits, or for some other reason.

There are similarities between Locarno and Paris, besides the obvious point that both characters were played by Robert Duncan McNeill. They’re both able pilots, they both have a cocky or arrogant streak, and both have an ambivalent relationship with the Federation and its rules. On the production side of things, it’s long been rumoured that Voyager’s creators wanted to use Nick Locarno, but were concerned about having to pay royalties to the writer of The Next Generation episode in which he originated, so a new, very similar character was created. A photo of McNeill in his role as Locarno can be briefly seen in Voyager, representing a younger Tom Paris in his father’s office. So there’s merit to this in theory… but Lower Decks has completely debunked it by now. And if it were true, I’d have expected Paris to have said so, or for it to have been noted by Janeway early on in the series. The “Locarno” persona might’ve worked for a while, but the scandal would surely have blown his cover, and his identity would be common knowledge by the time of Voyager – at least among senior officers.

Theory #11:
Section 31 isn’t a real Federation organisation – it’s a criminal syndicate pretending to be one.

Still frame from Star Trek: Section 31 showing four main characters.
Section 31: Federation black-ops division or crime syndicate?

The way Section 31 has been depicted in Star Trek has fluctuated a lot. There’s been the clandestine, shadowy agency we encountered in DS9 and later in Enterprise. Then there’s the out-in-the-open branch of Starfleet Intelligence from Discovery. And finally, the “rag-tag gang of misfits” from the TV movie. But one thing that has remained consistent in Section 31 is that the people involved are all Federation die-hards doing things they believe to be in the Federation’s best interests… even as they answer to no one and wield almost unfathomable power.

I can see a world in which a criminal syndicate would side with Starfleet to help prevent, say, the Federation’s total conquest by the Dominion. Or in which Starfleet would make deals with shady crime lords to acquire some kind of biological weapon when faced with an existential crisis. And I can even see a world where a clever criminal would *claim* to be from a government agency or black-ops division as a tactic. But do any of those things apply to Section 31? I would argue no. The closest Section 31 has come to that kind of presentation came in the TV movie, but even then, it was clear that Starfleet was involved – albeit that the mission was still off-the-record. So this idea is simply debunked by what we’ve seen on screen – as fun as it might seem.

Theory #12:
Jean-Luc Picard is Wesley Crusher’s biological father (and he treats him the way he does out of a sense of guilt or obligation).

Still frame from Star Trek: TNG S1, showing Picard, Dr Crusher, and Wesley.
Picard with Wesley on the bridge of the Enterprise-D.

Sometimes you come across a theory – even one that’s been doing the rounds for years – and you just feel… gobsmacked. I simply don’t read Picard and Wesley’s relationship in this way, and any paternal feelings Picard has for the younger Crusher is pretty clearly explained within the context of the show as stemming from his close friendships with Jack and Beverly. Picard does come to appreciate Wesley’s talents, even giving him a role on the bridge of his ship… but not out of any kind of obligation or guilt – it’s in recognition of Wesley’s skills.

I will admit that Picard’s third season complicated my rebuttal somewhat, as we learned that Picard and Dr Crusher did have a child together, and that Dr Crusher kept this a secret. If she did it once, could she have done it years earlier? It could have been an interesting plotline in The Next Generation or even in Picard, if it had been handled well, but despite having some merit in theory, nothing in the show itself leads us to that conclusion. And such a complex story would require a very sensitive and well-written episode or arc, and I’m not sure it would’ve been handled well or been well-received by a large portion of the fanbase. So this one… it can be your head-canon, if you like, but it goes no further in my opinion!

Theory #13:
The Progenitors evolved into the Founders.

Still frame from Star Trek TNG showing an ancient alien/Progenitor.
A Progenitor in The Next Generation.

I don’t know if this theory came about because the same actress (Salome Jens) played both the ancient alien hologram in The Chase and the Female Changeling on DS9, but I suspect that has something to do with it! In any case, this theory posits that the “Progenitors,” as Discovery would later dub them, didn’t go extinct or disappear from the galaxy, but instead evolved to become the Founders of the Dominion. And on the surface, it doesn’t seem totally impossible. The Founders claim to have once been fully solid. And the Founders are capable of genetically engineering entire races. But if the Founders *were* descendants of the ancient aliens who seeded the entire galaxy with life… you’d think they might’ve mentioned it.

For me, that’s where this theory falls down. Something so monumental to who the Founders are – and most Founders seem to be almost ageless – would surely be preserved knowledge, handed down through the millions of years of their existence. Yet the Founders not only don’t bring this up, but they’re distrustful of any non-shapeshifters to the point of paranoia – not something you’d expect to see in the grandparents of the galaxy’s races. I don’t really like the way the Progenitors’ storyline went or what it says about the Star Trek galaxy, and perhaps that’s my own bias showing through when I rule out this theory. But I do believe that something so important would be known to the Founders, and it would be something they’d have at least tried to communicate in their various dealings with “solids.” Not to mention that, for a race that would need to be billions of years old… it’s weird that their technology got to a 24th Century level and apparently stayed there.

Theory #14:
Every film and episode that premiered after First Contact takes place in an alternate reality, due to the changes made to the timeline.

Still frame from Star Trek: First Contact showing the launch of the Phoenix.
The launch of the Phoenix.

Time travel is a pain in the arse, isn’t it? Time-loops, paradoxes… all of that. It’s very difficult to write a compelling time travel story and pull it off flawlessly – even more so in a long-running franchise with a timeline that has to be basically consistent from one episode to the next. This theory posits that the changes Picard and co. made in the 21st Century were so serious that the Star Trek franchise can essentially be divided into two alternate realities: pre- and post-First Contact stories.

I don’t know how to word this without using terms like “destiny” or “fate,” but I think the way we’re meant to read the events of First Contact is that the interventions by the Borg and Enterprise-E were always “meant” to happen; i.e. they happen in every timeline. That’s why there was no Department of Temporal Investigations inquiry, and no ramifications for Picard for meddling in the timeline. We could also ask why First Contact should be the divide – why not other time travel stories, like The City on the Edge of Forever, Assignment: Earth, Past Tense, or even Endgame. All of these made major changes to the timeline that, by the same logic this theory uses, could create an alternate reality.

Theory #15:
Discovery Seasons 3-5 didn’t happen – and what we saw are Pike’s imaginings during his convalescence on Talos IV.

Still frame from Star Trek: Discovery showing Saru, Tilly, and Burnham.
Tilly, Saru, and Burnham in the 32nd Century.

I don’t see how you could subscribe to this theory without also writing off Starfleet Academy, Section 31, and probably Strange New Worlds, too, as they’re all connected. But setting that aside… this theory reminds me more than a little of the Star Wars so-called “theory” that one or more of the sequel trilogy films is “about to be removed from canon!!1!” In short, it feels like a bit of a cope from folks who don’t like Discovery, the 32nd Century setting, and in particular, the Burn.

My personal view, by the way, is that – somehow – a future Star Trek production should find a way to gently push Discovery’s 32nd Century out of the prime timeline, partially because of how depressing the Burn is as a future destination, but also because of how it turns any potential future film or TV show into a de facto prequel to Discovery. But that isn’t the issue here: this theory posits that nothing we saw on screen in Discovery’s 32nd Century actually happened to begin with. That simply isn’t true; Discovery, Strange New Worlds, Section 31, and Starfleet Academy all coexist in the prime timeline. You can choose to disregard different parts of Star Trek from your personal head-canon; fans have been doing that for decades. Or you can choose not to tune in to any new shows set in that era. That’s totally okay. But this theory can be nothing more than head-canon, and a heavy hit of copium for folks who hate where Discovery went.

Theory #16:
Dr Zimmerman used the Professor Moriarty hologram when creating the EMH.

Still frame from Star Trek: Voyager showing Dr Zimmerman.
Dr Lewis Zimmerman.

In the episode Elementary, Dear Data, we saw the creation of a sentient, self-aware hologram: Professor Moriarty, Sherlock Holmes’ nemesis. Moriarty would later be re-activated and trapped in a holographic world, before apparently being transferred to Section 31’s Daystrom Station by the early 25th Century. As one of the first truly sentient holograms, it’s not impossible to think Starfleet would’ve wanted to study Moriarty, figuring out how a simple miscommunication with the Enterprise-D’s computer could lead to such an entity coming to exist.

This theory goes a lot further, though, suggesting that Dr Zimmerman – the creator of the EMH programme – used Moriarty in some way, either as a “template” or just to further his own research. And while nothing on-screen explicitly contradicts this idea, it’s just not something I think makes a ton of sense. Zimmerman is presented as egotistical and selfish, so the idea that he’d rely on someone else’s work instead of developing his own holograms doesn’t make a lot of sense. And it’s strongly implied in DS9 and Voyager that the EMH Mark I (i.e. the Doctor) had a long and difficult creation process, with some of Zimmerman’s more basic holograms coming first. So while the idea of Starfleet researching Moriarty makes sense, I don’t think Zimmerman being involved really does.

Theory #17:
Enterprise’s mysterious “Humanoid Figure” is Archer from the future, and he’s trying to sabotage his own earlier missions. For some reason.

Still frame from Star Trek: Enterprise showing Archer and the Humanoid Figure.
Archer meeting… himself?

This theory has the benefit of having been discussed by some of the original writers of Enterprise – with a suggestion that this was even a seriously-considered plot point for what would’ve been Season 5. But as we said above: time travel, time-loops, and paradoxes are really difficult to get right, and the idea of an older, jaded Archer somehow deciding that he wants to sabotage his own earlier mission and his own life… such a story would be difficult to write in a way that made sense, and it would be a challenge to pull it off successfully.

I’ve always interpreted the “Humanoid Figure” as simply being one of the leaders of a faction from the Temporal Cold War/Temporal Wars, though to be honest, I try not to think too hard about this element of Enterprise. Time travel stories just aren’t my favourites in Star Trek, and a significant portion of Enterprise was taken up by these kinds of plotlines. If the “Humanoid Figure” was meant to be Archer – which he wasn’t, at least not originally, as no identity was built into the character at first – it raises too many questions, and would realistically have needed a multi-episode arc. Given what we know of Archer’s future – his captaincy of the NX-01 and his later role in the founding and leadership of the Federation – this villainous turn (and his apparent acquiring of time travel tech) doesn’t make sense, and I struggle to see how a story could be written to take Archer from the textbook definition of a Starfleet captain to a man who tries (and fails) to sabotage… himself.

Theory #18:
We (the audience) are living in the timeline that ultimately becomes the Mirror Universe.

Still frame from Star Trek: Discovery S3 showing Terrans on the bridge.
Soldiers of the Terran Empire.

Do you ever read something and just think to yourself, “god, you were *so close* to understanding the point… but then you blew it?” The Mirror Universe is *intended* to be uncomfortably close to reality – any sci-fi dystopia is! That’s the point of the genre, and Star Trek’s Mirror Universe is meant to be a mirror (get it?) of our current society’s darkest impulses, moral failings, and inclination towards autocracy. That’s the entire point! It’s Star Trek showing us a dark reflection of ourselves to make us pause and think.

If you see elements of the Mirror Universe in today’s world, that isn’t because we’re in some dark timeline that Star Trek predicted… it’s because the stories were deliberately written that way to show us some of our own failings and societal problems. The point isn’t to fall into depression and pessimism, to say that we’re on a dark path and there’s nothing we can do but wait for the Terran Empire to emerge. We’re meant to look at these stories and say, “let’s do something about that. Let’s make changes for the better.” The Mirror Universe, with its pantomime-level overacting and one-dimensional baddies, has never been my cup of tea, and as a metaphor I think it’s almost too basic and too unserious. But in a way, that’s part of how it works: it’s storytelling by fable. The point was never that we’re locked into a dark path to the “bad outcome,” the point is that we have these dark impulses, but we can overcome them. Bad things can happen, and bad leaders can rise to power – but we can stop them.

Theory #19:
The Genesis Device and replicators are the same technology.

Still from Star Trek III showing the Genesis Planet.
The Genesis Planet.

This one made me smile. In a way, I like the idea of Starfleet looking at the Genesis Project and saying, “yeah, let’s not use it to terraform planets, let’s use it to make bowls of tomato soup.” It’s just kind of small-scale and silly. And it’s true that, out here in the real world, technological innovation often comes from unexpected places. An attempt to create a high-strength adhesive famously led to the weak glue used for post-it notes, for instance!

Star Trek works best when its technologies are deliberately kept vague. That allows for maximum wiggle-room when telling a story, and it also allows for head-canon like this to exist. I guess you could say that, based on what we know of both the Genesis Device and replicators, they both use subatomic particles to change one form of matter into another. But does that mean that one was developed from the other, or that Starfleet shut down Project Genesis only to use the same technology in a totally different way? I don’t see it.

Theory #20:
The entire Soong family are clones – which is why they all look the same.

Composite image of various Soong characters from Star Trek.
A family portrait…

This theory exists for one reason and one reason alone: every member of the Soong family that we’ve met is played by the same actor! Brent Spiner took on the role of Data’s creator in The Next Generation, and this was later expanded in Enterprise and Picard to include new ancestors and descendants of the Soong family. They all look the same because they’re all Brent Spiner. But could there be more to it than that?

Adam Soong, the earliest-known Soong ancestor, was interested in genetic engineering, so could he have cloned himself in the mid-21st Century, sometime after the events of Picard’s second season? I mean, it’s not *impossible*, I suppose. But we know in the prime timeline that genetic engineering has been outlawed, so the practice can’t have continued through the generations all the way to Altan Soong in the late 24th Century, surely.

Theory #21:
Worf has an incorrect (or incomplete) idea of what it means to be a Klingon, because he only learned about his culture from Federation books.

Promo photo for Star Yrek: Picard S3 showing Worf.
Worf.

Worf is a Klingon… but he was raised from a young age by humans. That’s a core part of his character background, and having lived away from his homeworld and his people, Worf can feel torn between his loyalties to Starfleet and to the Klingons. But does Worf truly know what being a Klingon means, having only learned about his culture from books? Some fans seem to think he doesn’t, arguing that it explains why Worf seems to lack the famous Klingon sense of humour, being very dour and serious almost all of the time. Others have even suggested that Worf might have a form of “Klingon autism.”

There is the kernel of an interesting idea here, and I think it could’ve been fun to put Worf into a Klingon story as a “fish out of water,” or better, as someone who *thinks* they know everything… until they’re confronted by people who’ve been immersed in that culture from day one. But Star Trek never went down that route, and there are other examples of stoic Klingons who share some of Worf’s traits. It’s an interesting theory, in some ways, but we’ve spent so much time with Worf over the years, and he’s had so many encounters with a huge number of Klingons, that if this theory were even close to true… we’d have seen something more concrete.

Theory #22:
Romulans are the “true” Vulcans, and Vulcans are the ones who left.

Still frame from Star Trek: Strange New Worlds showing a Romulan commander.
A 23rd Century Romulan.

This just flat-out isn’t true. It’s established multiple times in Star Trek that the Romulans were the ones who left their homeworld behind after rejecting the Vulcans’ moves to embrace logic and purge their emotions. Now, if this theory had said that Romulan culture is the original Vulcan culture, I guess we could have more of a conversation, because there’s a way to read the Romulan-Vulcan split that would say the Romulans preserved a pre-Surak, pre-logic culture that the Vulcans may have possessed. But that’s never been confirmed on screen.

What I think would be a way more interesting theory is this: the Vulcans have *always* known the Romulans’ true identity, but chose not to share that with Earth and humanity, perhaps out of a sense of shame or fear. I think there’s a great case to be made that the Vulcans either kept track of the Romulans or else were able to scan their bio-signs, analyse their language, or something after re-encountering them. It’s always seemed likely to me that Vulcan leadership, at least, was aware of their shared history – even if individuals like Spock may not have been. But this idea that the Vulcans are the offshoot… it just doesn’t line up with what we’ve seen on screen in many different stories.

Theory #23:
There is no “Q Continuum;” there’s only one Q, and after billions of years of isolation and loneliness, he’s developed some kind of multiple personality disorder.

Still frame from Star Trek Picard S2 showing Q.
Q in Star Trek: Picard.

Again, we have a theory that directly contradicts things we’ve seen on screen. As far back as The Next Generation, Q was confirmed to be just one member of a species, and we even met other Q in the show. I guess this theory would also propose that all of those individuals were the same Q, but that doesn’t make a lot of sense, does it? Nor does the idea of a Q civil war, as seen in Voyager, or one member of the Continuum committing suicide. If we’d only met Q a few times, and never seen other members of his race, I’d at least have to concede that this one was plausible. But having met dozens of other Q and literally visited the Continuum itself… I think there’s more than enough evidence to dump this one in the “debunked” pile.

There are mysteries associated with Q, though – not least what became of the familiar John de Lancie character after his apparent “death” in Picard’s second season. I just don’t see this as being a plausible theory, or even something mysterious at all. The Q Continuum exists, other Q exist, and trying to overwrite that would mean dozens of stories would be adversely affected. It’s an interesting thought, for sure, but one that just feels thoroughly debunked by what we see on screen.

Theory #24:
The species that abandoned Armus were the Founders.

Still frame from Star Trek: TNG S1 showing Armus.
Armus.

This theory obviously comes from Armus and the Founders both existing in a liquid state, and I can see why it might seem plausible on the surface. But there are two pretty big issues which, in my view, render it null and void. Firstly, Armus lives in the Alpha (or Beta) Quadrant, whereas the Founders and Dominion are native to the Gamma Quadrant. Without access to the Wormhole (which the Founders canonically did not know about until they met the Federation), that’s a decades- or centuries-long journey.

Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, if the point of creating and abandoning Armus was for the Founders to shed their “skin of evil,” and to leave all of their negative traits and qualities behind… it didn’t exactly work, did it? The Founders are paranoid, hateful, and view themselves as superior to most other forms of life. So… how is Armus alone the sum total of all of their negative qualities? Between that and the distances involved, I have to say that I don’t find this one to be plausible. The fact that both the Founders and Armus are liquid doesn’t do enough to outweigh that.

Theory #25:
Apparent discrepancies between The Original Series and the rest of Star Trek are because TOS is a holonovel being viewed from the 24th Century.

Promo image of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy from Star Trek.
Kirk, Spock, and Dr McCoy.

I admire the lengths some fans are willing to go to in order to smooth out inconsistencies in Star Trek’s canon. A similar theory states that These Are The Voyages didn’t happen as shown, because it was an exaggerated or misremembered holo-programme. But in this case… I mean, firstly there’s just no evidence at all that a single part of TOS is a holo-programme. Then there are episodes like Trials and Tribble-ations, which very clearly show that TOS and the 24th Century share a setting. And while there can be inconsistencies within Star Trek’s canon, I’m not even convinced at this point that the line should be drawn between TOS and the rest of the franchise. Why not between, say, Voyager’s finale and everything that came after?

This will sound unsatisfying, especially for folks who love to theorise – and I get that, believe me. But the plain and simple fact is that these discrepancies and inconsistencies exist because Star Trek is a long-running franchise, and these are stories. Sometimes, a new story seems to overwrite or retcon something, or makes a change that’s inconsistent with what came before. While I have argued in the past that internal consistency is important, I’m also not a stickler for the tiniest minutiae of canon, and I believe there’s enough wiggle-room in Star Trek for all of the various parts of its universe to coexist in a single setting.

So that’s it… for now!

Still frame from Star Trek IV showing the sun on the Bounty viewscreen.
We’re flying too close to the sun…

I hope this has been fun. Twenty-five theories was a lot, but at the same time… I feel there’s more to this idea. So if your favourite bad theory didn’t make the cut, stay tuned. I may revisit this concept in the future, if I can find more fan theories to pick on.

As I said at the beginning, this was meant to be a bit of fun, and not something to get too wound up or upset over. While I don’t personally subscribe to any of these theories – for reasons I’ve tried to explain – I found all of them to be interesting, and I don’t want to dent anyone’s passion for Star Trek. I’m a theory-crafter myself, so I respect and appreciate other folks putting their theories out there to be discussed.

HD still frame from the documentary What We Left Behind showing a close-up of DS9.
It’s DS9!

I’ve got a few more ideas for articles and columns as Star Trek’s huge sixtieth anniversary year rolls on. How many TV shows and franchises can say they’ve made it this far, eh? Not many, that’s for sure! It’s a testament to how amazing this franchise is that so many years later, people like us are still discussing and debating every aspect of Star Trek, and still enjoy getting lost in this fantastic setting.

So please stick around throughout 2026 for more pieces celebrating all things Star Trek! Next month, I daresay I’ll be writing a review of Starfleet Academy’s first season. And I’m still hopeful we’ll see Strange New Worlds before the year is out. And there are other theories, discussions, and episode re-watches to get into, too.

Thanks for tuning in this time… and Live Long and Prosper, friends!


The Star Trek franchise – including most films and TV series discussed above – can be streamed now on Paramount+ in countries and territories where the platform is available. Many are also available on DVD and/or Blu-ray. The Star Trek franchise is the copyright of Skydance-Paramount. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.

Worf and the spiral of clickbait

One potential news story that I opted not to cover here on the website was a recent social media post by Worf actor Michael Dorn. In a single Twitter post, Dorn wrote the following: “Just got the news, being summoned back into action. Starfleet calls. #ad”

Well, no sooner had that post hit Twitter than the Star Trek fan community began scrambling to “break” the news of Worf’s return to Star Trek. Websites, blogs, and YouTube shows all jumped on Dorn’s post, using headlines like: “Michael Dorn CONFIRMS Worf’s Return!” As the battle for clicks escalated, Trekkies online began speculating about what form Worf’s return could take, and this too began to grow and spiral out of control.

The Tweet that launched a thousand clickbait articles…

The Captain Worf series that he’s been trying to get off the ground for the better part of a decade seemed to be 100% confirmed, if you believed certain websites and channels. Others were convinced the Twitter post meant Worf would appear in Picard Season 2 or Discovery Season 4. And of course, many outlets reported their wild speculation with minimal caveats as though it were fact.

All of this hype came crashing down within 48 hours, however, when it became clear that Dorn’s Twitter post was nothing more than an advertisement for mobile game Star Trek Legends, an Apple Arcade exclusive title. Legends looks like so many other mobile games released in the last few years, and I have no desire to sign up to Apple Arcade at £5 per month just to play one mediocre-looking title. Even if it does have Worf!

Logo for Star Trek Legends.

Uninspired mobile games aside, I think this whole Michael Dorn saga is yet another example in a very long line of how we have to be incredibly careful how we use social media and how difficult it is to trust even supposedly “reputable” outlets. In this piece I’ll look at the issue as it relates to the Star Trek fan community in particular, but obviously these same broad points can apply to news, politics, and so on.

Michael Dorn’s post was designed to get attention. He may have written it himself, but it’s equally likely – in my opinion as someone who used to work in video games marketing – that it was written by the marketing team behind Star Trek Legends. But whoever wrote the actual words, the post was deliberately ambiguous and designed to get Trekkies talking, playing on fan hopes of the return of a major character who hasn’t been seen on screen since 2002.

Worf made his last canonical appearance in 2002’s Star Trek: Nemesis.

Marketers do this kind of thing all the time; it’s a nostalgia play. It isn’t the first time we’ve seen it in the Star Trek community, either. But because we’re in an age of 24/7 social media use, some of the biggest names in the online Star Trek fandom jumped on Dorn’s comment, seeing an easy way to get clicks – and thus money – for themselves.

Reading the Twitter post, and especially seeing the #ad hashtag, it should’ve been screamingly obvious that this was not connected to a new television show or film. And I have no doubt whatsoever that the social media managers, webmasters, and fan group leaders who began to write clickbaity articles and produce clickbait videos knew that for a fact. But they did so anyway. It was a topic of conversation – and an easy win. Who wouldn’t click on a video or article that screamed “Worf is coming back!” in big bold capital letters? For fans unaware of the original Twitter post, they jumped on such articles and videos hoping to learn that Worf was getting his own show or that he would appear in Picard – the natural implication of such a headline.

Worf having a role in Picard Season 2 was something some fans speculated about at length.

I’m lucky to have my own website, and that means I can cover the topics I want to at my own pace. I did see the Michael Dorn controversy unfold, but two things became apparent very quickly. First was that no one commenting online, no matter how large their website and following, actually knew anything substantial. And second, Dorn’s post had the #ad hashtag, which meant it was clearly connected to a product of some kind. Star Trek Legends turned out to be that product.

As a result, I chose not to cover a “story” that was a bag of nothing. I could easily have penned a short article about the prospects of a Captain Worf series and the potential for Worf to appear in Picard Season 2, Discovery Season 4, or Lower Decks Season 2. Maybe doing so would have driven traffic to the website. But it would’ve felt more than a little dishonest.

Worf in The Next Generation Season 7 episode Lower Decks.

Rumours swirl in the Star Trek fan community all the time – as indeed they do in every online community. But most of these “rumours” are clearly nonsense, based on unverified and often unspecified sources. The truth is that ViacomCBS and the creative team in charge of Star Trek generally do a good job at keeping a lid on leaks. Occasionally a story will leak ahead of an official announcement, but as we’ve seen with some big projects recently, including the new film scheduled for 2023, most of the time that is simply not the case. Yet many social media channels, fan groups, and websites insist on reporting rumour as if it were fact.

When I write speculatively here on the website, you’ll note that I always caveat what I’m saying by explaining that I have no “insider information” nor any “sources.” This is specifically to damp down any theory or speculation that I’m writing about and to clarify that it’s just guesswork on my part. Sometimes it’s educated guesswork, putting together things that seem obvious even if there’s yet to be official confirmation, but even then such a caveat is incredibly important.

Worf is a character in mobile game Star Trek Legends.

It’s easy for a website or social media group to fall into the trap of writing clickbait based on things like Michael Dorn’s Twitter post, but it doesn’t do anything for the Star Trek fan community. In some cases it can be actively harmful – building up hype and expectations that are obviously only going to lead to disappointment. Marketing folks need to be aware of this, as well. As much as Dorn’s post got people talking about Star Trek Legends, they deliberately set up Trekkies for disappointment by allowing Dorn to imply – albeit in a way that should’ve been easy for fans to see through – that Worf was coming back to Star Trek.

But the blame in this case doesn’t lie only with the marketing team at Star Trek Legends, who are, after all, doing their best to market a product. It lies with fan groups, websites, and social media channels who took that obvious piece of marketing and put their own spin on it, building up the hype of Worf’s possible return to Star Trek in order to drive clicks, views, and website traffic.

Worf in a teaser video for Star Trek Legends posted on Twitter.

This is what I mean by the “spiral” of clickbait: a slightly dishonest marketing post on social media appears. Fan websites and social media channels jump on it and take it out of context, in some cases completely disregarding or ignoring the possibility of it being marketing. As the hype bubble starts to build, more outlets and fans jump on the story, talking about it and driving more and more clicks and traffic. What began as a single post advertising a mobile game thus exploded to become a big story online, and it didn’t need to be. From the marketers’ point of view, it’s a rousing success! But for fans, at best it’s a mild disappointment.

It’s becoming increasingly difficult to find reliable, objective sources of information online, and it’s getting to a point where, unless something is confirmed unambiguously by an official outlet, I don’t trust it.

We all need to be careful what we read and watch, and try our best not to give in to clickbait!

Star Trek Legends is out now for iOS devices via Apple Arcade. The Star Trek franchise – including all titles mentioned above – is the copyright of ViacomCBS. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.