What If…? Star Trek Edition!

A Star Trek-themed spoiler warning.

Spoiler Warning: There are spoilers ahead for the following Star Trek productions: The Original Series, The Motion Picture, The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager, Enterprise, Discovery, Picard, and the video game Star Trek: Voyager – Across the Unknown.

Let’s celebrate Star Trek’s 60th anniversary year with another of my Marvel-inspired “What If…” articles! This is something I’ve done a couple of times before here on the website, and I’ll briefly go over the format if you’re unfamiliar with it. I thought this could be a fun and interesting way to continue our 60th anniversary celebrations, anyway.

In 2021, Disney and Marvel premiered a series called What If…? on Disney+. The concept was, in brief, to show alternate histories of the Marvel universe; different characters or altered decisions leading to, in some cases, radically different or unexpected outcomes. I didn’t watch the show (because I’m not really into Marvel or superheroes that much), but I really liked the concept behind the series, and I wanted to apply it to the Star Trek franchise, too.

Promo graphic for Season 3 of Marvel's "What If."
This idea is based on the Marvel TV series What If…?

My first take on this idea – which you can find by clicking or tapping here – saw me consider what might’ve happened if: Captain Picard died after the events of The Best of Both Worlds, Spock was never resurrected on the Genesis Planet in The Search for Spock, Voyager decided to head for the Gamma Quadrant terminus of the Bajoran Wormhole, the USS Discovery never went to the future, and Captain Sisko wasn’t the Prophets’ Emissary. I had fun delving into all of those ideas and laying out my “alternate histories of the future!”

Last year, in my second piece – which you can find by clicking or tapping here – I talked about what could’ve happened if: Captain Picard and Q never met, Section 31 was responsible for creating the Borg, the USS Voyager was destroyed over Ocampa and the survivors were picked up by Chakotay’s Maquis raider, the Romulans eventually figured out the deception from In The Pale Moonlight, and Captain Kirk survived the events of Generations. Again, all of those were a ton of fun to consider.

Be sure to check out those earlier pieces if you enjoy this format. And feel free to use the same concept in your own writing or on social media, too!

Scan/photo of hand-drawn concept art of the USS Enterprise (or the Enterprise filming model) from Star Trek: TOS.
Concept art of the USS Enterprise filming model.

So today, I’m back for a third crack at this idea. I’ve chosen five storylines from across the Star Trek franchise, and I’m going to answer the question “what if things were different?”

My usual caveat applies: all of this is *subjective, not objective*, so if you hate all of my ideas and mini-stories, that’s okay! There’s plenty of room in the Trekkie community for differences of opinion and disagreements without getting into an argument. None of this is even *remotely* canon, anyway, nor will it ever be – so if you really do hate my ideas, you can take solace there, I hope!

With all of that out of the way, let’s get started!

What If… #1:
What if… the USS Voyager returned home after the events of Caretaker?

Screenshot from the Across the Unknown demo showing Janeway and Earth.
Could Captain Janeway bring the crew home seven years ahead of schedule?

Shout out to the upcoming video game Across The Unknown, where you can actually pull this off if you want!

In this scenario, we’re starting with Voyager’s premiere: Caretaker. But we’re going to do things a little differently! As happened in an alternate timeline glimpsed in the episode Non Sequitur, Tom Paris got arrested by Odo on DS9, and never even set foot aboard Voyager. In our take on the story, we’re going to say that Captain Janeway approached Commander Sisko for advice, as she was still in need of a guide to the Badlands. Sisko would “loan” two of his officers to assist her on the mission – people who are familiar with the Badlands, both scientifically and geographically: Jadzia Dax and Michael Eddington.

Both officers would be present on the bridge during the search for Chakotay’s ship, and both would survive the displacement wave that dragged Voyager to the Delta Quadrant. After encountering the Kazon, Ocampa, and the Caretaker, Voyager’s captain and senior staff would be faced with the same dilemma as in the prime timeline: use the Array to return home, or destroy it to prevent it from falling into the hands of the Kazon.

Screenshot from Star Trek: Voyager - Across the Unknown showing Voyager, Kazon ships, and the Array.
Voyager and three Kazon vessels at the Caretaker’s Array.

There are two factors at play, I think. Firstly, Eddington’s true loyalties lie not with Starfleet, but with the Maquis. I think he’d be desperate to get back to DS9 so that he could continue to work undercover, building up to his big defection in For The Cause. Eddington would be one of the most significant voices arguing for a return home. Dax, too, would be keen to get back, but her centuries of experience and scientific background would come into play here. Dax might be able to find a way to set Voyager’s tricobalt devices to detonate on a timer, allowing the Array to be sabotaged, and then used to return home. Or, by having someone with a keen scientific mind access the Array, other options for using its technology could have presented themselves.

In any case, we’re going to say that a way is found for Voyager to use the Array to return home. Eddington would do just enough to ensure that the Val Jean (Chakotay’s ship) makes it back just before Voyager, allowing them to escape Federation custody while keeping his cover intact. Then, Voyager would end up back in the Alpha Quadrant, just outside of the Badlands. Waiting for them would be Sisko and the USS Defiant, just beginning a search-and-rescue when Voyager failed to report back.

Edited still frame from two Star Trek episodes, depicting the USS Defiant as seen on the USS Voyager's viewscreen.
How it might’ve looked if Voyager had returned home almost immediately.

The real consequences of this would be felt later, though. Chakotay, B’Elanna, Eddington, and others would be killed at the beginning of the Dominion War, when the Dominion-backed Cardassians (perhaps aided by Seska as an embedded spy) wiped out the Maquis. In the Delta Quadrant, the Ocampa would still be confronted with the reality of life without their Caretaker, and would eventually have to find a way to leave their underground city.

But there are more serious repercussions. At time of writing, it seems as if Janeway is directly responsible for the destruction of the Borg Queen and at least a significant portion of the Borg Collective (as seen in Picard Season 3). If she doesn’t undertake that seven-year journey, never meets Seven of Nine, and never travels back in time to plant a pathogen directly into the Borg Queen… the Borg will be in a massively strengthened position by the early 25th Century. The Collective may not need to employ rogue changelings to infiltrate Starfleet – they might just choose to launch a full-scale invasion. And without crucial information on the Borg that was collected by Voyager, Seven of Nine, the Hansen family, and more… Starfleet would be significantly more vulnerable.

What If… #2:
What if… the Talosians joined the Federation?

Still frame from Star Trek's original pilot (The Cage) showing four Talosians.
A group of Talosians.

We’re going all the way back to the beginning with this one – appropriate, in this milestone anniversary year. In short, it’s never sat quite right with me that Starfleet and the Federation would view the Talosians so negatively – and as such a dangerous threat – after just one interaction. Lest we forget, Captain Pike’s mission to Talos IV ended without any loss of life, and arguably with the beginnings of an understanding or even dialogue between the Talosians and humankind. Pike and the crew came to understand the Talosians’ situation, and for their part, the Talosians were able to acknowledge that humans (and Vulcans) were not suitable captives.

So in this alternate timeline, we’re going to say that Captain Pike returns to Starfleet HQ with a different mission report. Instead of recommending that Talos IV be quarrantined and declared to be off-limits, he instead advocates for sending aid to the Talosians to help rebuild or maintain their technology and rehabilitate the devastated surface of their world. The Talosians would be taken aback by this generosity, and would vow never to use their impressive telepathic powers to trick the Federation.

Still frame from Star Trek: Discovery Season 2 showing a trio of Talosians.
The Talosians as they appeared in Discovery’s second season.

Over time, the Talosian population would begin to grow, and Talosians would occasionally venture off-world, mingling with other citizens of the galaxy. The Talosians and Betazoids would form a particularly strong bond, as two races that both prefer telepathic communication. This would, in turn, set the stage for Talos IV joining the Federation as a full member world, coming under the protection of Starfleet and deepening their ties.

Though their numbers would be small at first, by the early 24th Century, Talosian officers would occasionally be seen in Starfleet – though the Federation would make them take oaths not to use their powers for deception (similar to the oaths that Deltan officers had to take, as seen in The Motion Picture). Talosians would be present for many of the major events of the late 23rd and 24th Centuries: the Federation’s alliance with the Klingons, the Romulan Empire’s isolation, the rising Borg threat, and the Dominion War.

Screenshot from Star Trek Online showing a Jem'Hadar ship and DS9.
A Jem’Hadar warship near DS9.
Image: Star Trek Online Wiki

It’s the latter event that I want to focus on now. After the Dominion War breaks out, the Talosian government, working in conjunction with Section 31, would hatch a plan to deceive the Dominion and the Cardassians on an unimaginable scale. Working as a group, the Talosians would use their mental powers to trick the Dominion alliance into believing they were on the offensive, about to retake Deep Space Nine and Bajor – all the while, a combined Federation and Klingon fleet would be launching an assault right into the heart of Cardassian territory.

The Dominion War could be ended in a matter of days, thanks to tapping into the Talosians’ impressive powers, and the Dominion would be forced to the negotiating table having been deceived into believing they were winning. But while the war was being settled and a peace treaty signed, something else would happen: the Battle of Sector 001, where a lone Talosian officer would be serving aboard a starship. This would be the Borg’s first encounter with a Talosian, and their assimilation might just have given the Borg a terrifying new upgrade…

What If… #3
What if… Bruce Maddox successfully convinced Starfleet to let him disassemble Data?

Still frame from Star Trek: The Next Generation (The Measure of a Man) showing Dr Maddox.
Dr Bruce Maddox.

In The Next Generation Season 2 episode The Measure of a Man, we’re introduced to Dr Bruce Maddox: the Federation’s top cybernetic scientist. Dr Maddox would request that Data be turned over to him in order to be disassembled, planning to use the knowledge he’d gain to create legions of synths. In the prime timeline, Starfleet would deny this request, allowing Data to explore his sentience and his life in his own way. But in our alternate timeline? Starfleet instead rules that Data, as an artificial being, is not a “person,” and therefore cannot refuse Dr Maddox’s request.

This is such an interesting debate, because right now, out here in the real world, artificial intelligence – or some form of it, in any case – is a big deal. And despite what I’ve argued in the past about the limitations of today’s large language models, I admit to feeling uncomfortable about the idea of a potentially sentient A.I. being forced to do things it may not want to do. This will have to be the subject of an entire essay one day, but it’s so interesting to me how, some thirty-five years on from The Measure of a Man, the issues it raised are incredibly relevant!

Still frame from Star Trek: The Next Generation (The Measure of a Man) showing Riker holding Data's arm at the trial.
Data and Riker at the hearing.

But that’s enough about that for now. There would be *many* consequences as a result of Starfleet’s decision. In the immediate term, I think Captain Picard would resign his commission. It would be a desperate, last-ditch effort to convince the higher-ups at Starfleet to change their minds, but it would ultimately fail. This would lead to Riker getting temporary command of the Enterprise-D, before command would ultimately pass to a more senior officer – someone like Captain Edward Jellico.

But more serious consequences lay in store. In the prime timeline, Dr Maddox was able to use B-4 – an earlier and less complex Soong-type android – to construct a large number of pretty basic synths. But with Data fully disassembled, Maddox’s work would progress a lot further a lot faster, and synthetics not quite at Data’s level, but not too far behind, would begin to be rolled out across Starfleet. This would draw the attention of the Zhat Vash – an underground Romulan faction dedicated to preventing synthetic life from ever coming to exist.

Still frame from Star Trek: Picard (Maps and Legends) showing a group of synths.
Synths as seen in Star Trek: Picard.

The timing of this couldn’t be worse for Starfleet. After the Battle of Wolf 359, Starfleet was at a particularly low ebb. Senior admirals encouraged Dr Maddox to work faster, hoping to use his new synths in the rebuilding process, and poured a lot of resources into his synth programme. At the same time, Ambassador Spock travelled to Romulus in the hopes of promoting reunification. Without Picard and Data to stop the Romulans, and with the Zhat Vash aggressively pressuring the Romulan leadership to engage the Federation, the Romulan attack on Vulcan would prove successful – and it would be the first strike in a new Federation-Romulan conflict.

With Commodore Oh acting as an embedded spy, feeding information back to the Romulan Empire, they’d quickly gain the upper hand in this new war. The war would go poorly for the Federation, even if Oh was eventually captured, and with Starfleet still underpowered after the defeat at Wolf 359, it would be impossible for the Federation to defend all of its territory. The only outcome short of total conquest would be accepting a very difficult peace treaty, which would certainly include a clause prohibiting any and all research into synthetic life.

What If… #4:
What if… the Borg attack on Earth in the 22nd Century had been much more serious?

Still frame from Star Trek: Enterprise (Regeneration) showing the assimilated shuttle bearing down on the NX-01.
The Borg attacking the NX-01 Enterprise.

Regeneration, from Season 2 of Enterprise, is a fun episode in isolation… but I don’t really like what it does for the timeline of humanity’s conflict with the Borg. Setting that aside, though, let’s think about what might’ve happened if the Borg had managed to do a lot more damage to Earth in the 22nd Century. I’m not going to argue that this handful of defrosted drones would’ve been able to fully assimilate Earth in this era; I think, somehow, Starfleet and humanity would have prevailed. But in our alternate timeline, things are much more serious and the damage much more extensive.

Instead of merely assimiliating a single shuttle, the reactivated Borg drones would take over an entire starship: Enterprise. They’d assimilate practically the entire crew, kitting out the ship with upgraded weapons, and then they’d bring the fight back to Earth, in line with their original mission. It would take everything Starfleet had – and the sacrifice of many human and Vulcan lives – but the attack would eventually be stopped, with the remaining Borg being captured and studied.

Still frame from Star Trek: The Next Generation (Q Who) showing a Borg drone attacking the Enterprise-D.
A Borg drone.

After causing devastation to parts of Earth unseen in more than a century, the United Earth government would re-think its planned mission of space exploration. Enterprise, humanity’s first long-range exploration vessel, has been lost, and the NX-02 would be repurposed as a purely defensive ship instead. The alliance with the Vulcans would weaken as humanity became a much more insular and isolationist power, scarred by the Borg attack and frightened of venturing too far into a galaxy that clearly poses a lot of dangers.

The Borg remnants would be extensively studied, in the hopes of discovering ways to counteract their technology, and some of these discoveries would lead to powerful Earth- and space-based weapons for humanity centuries ahead of schedule. The Xindi attack a year or so later would be *easily* defeated with Borg-powered weapons salvaged from the wreck of Enterprise.

Still frame from Star Trek: Enterprise (Regeneration) showing scientists and a Borg arm.
Humanity would study the Borg and their tech.

But in the longer term, this isolationist stance would mean that the galaxy looks *very* different. Without humanity to mediate, the Vulcans and Andorians would wage a devastating war. Without Starfleet exploring and pushing the boundaries, there’d be no conflict between humanity and the Romulans. But most significantly… there’d never be a United Federation of Planets. Earth would maintain limited interstellar trade, including with the Denobulans and Vulcans, but fear-induced isolationism would become baked into the United Earth government at every level, with all talk of alliances or further missions of exploration being shut down.

By the time we reach the more familiar 23rd and 24th Centuries, the snowball has been rolling for a long time, and changes become unpredictable. But I’m going to posit that some of the Alpha and Beta Quadrant’s more aggressive powers – the Klingons, Romulans, and Cardassians – are all in much stronger positions without the Federation as a counterbalance. New alliances may emerge, such as the Mirror Universe’s Klingon-Cardassian alliance, or some powers may fully conquer others. The Romulans, for instance, may succeed at conquering Vulcan after the Andorian war left the Vulcans in a weakened state, or maybe the Klingons will launch an all-out war against their Cardassian rivals. And all the while, a strange, overlooked, isolationist Earth will be ready to shoot first and ask questions later whenever an uninvited guest arrives in the Sol system.

What If… #5:
What if… the Federation and the Ferengi went to war?

Still frame from Star Trek: The Next Generation Season 1 showing three Ferengi.
Three Ferengi from The Next Generation.

Chances are you already know this if you’re a Trekkie, but the Ferengi were originally supposed to be a major antagonist when The Next Generation was in early production. Gene Roddenberry intended for the Ferengi to take over the role vacated by the Klingons, now that Worf was going to be a permanent fixture on the bridge of the Enterprise-D. However… it didn’t pan out that way, mostly because of the way the Ferengi were presented in their first couple of appearances, and the way audiences responded to that.

In this case, though, we’re going to say that the Ferengi and the Federation didn’t just get off on the wrong foot… they continued down a path that would quickly lead to war. Ferengi DaiMons, eager for plunder, began raiding Federation convoys, stealing everything they could get their hands on, and even holding Starfleet officers and crew for ransom. Starfleet responded by taking an aggressive stance towards the Ferengi, sending armed escorts with trading and supply vessels, and gearing up for a confrontation.

Behind-the-scenes photo from the Star Trek TNG S3 episode Menage a Troi showing Gene Roddenberry and actor Peter Slutsker (in Ferengi makeup).
Gene Roddenberry originally intended for the Ferengi to become a major villainous faction.

This version of the Ferengi – perhaps led by a more aggressive ruler than Grand Nagus Zek – would be less conciliatory, and would instead see war and piracy as opportunities for profit. Around the time of The Next Generation’s second season – which takes place in approximately 2365 – this would spill over into all-out war. The Ferengi DaiMons – most of whom had been acting autonomously up to this point – would be corralled by their Nagus into a proper fighting force, and their powerful D’Kora-class ships (the Ferengi Marauders) were more or less evenly-matched with Starfleet’s Galaxy-class vessels. The war would drag on.

I doubt this war would become existential for either the Ferengi or for the Federation, but it would be the most significant conflict either power had been involved in for decades, at the very least. The distraction would pause Starfleet’s mission of exploration, with more vessels being refitted and sent to the front lines, meaning that dozens of first contacts (and other missions) would come years later – or else would be missed entirely. And all the while, the Borg are on the prowl, scooping up outlying Federation and Romulan colonies. Blame for that might even initially fall on the Ferengi.

Promo screenshot for Star Trek Online showing a D'Kora Class ship.
A D’Kora-class ship.

A peace treaty would eventually be signed, with the Ferengi and Federation agreeing to respect a shared border, and a prohibition would be placed on piracy – though renegade Ferengi DaiMons would continually flout this. But the war would sap Starfleet’s resources, leading to a monumental decision: the Federation would decline the Bajorans’ request to take over Terok Nor after the Cardassian withdrawal. Deep Space Nine would never be established, and the Bajoran wormhole would go undiscovered for decades.

This would completely change the course of the latter 24th Century: there’d be no Dominion War, no Cardassian alliance with the Dominion, no changeling infiltrations, and no Emissary of the Prophets. The Bajoran provisional government would struggle to remain in control of its system, and the Federation would commit to providing only limited aid to the Bajorans, earning their resentment. The eventual discovery of the Bajoran wormhole in the early 25th Century would lead to plenty of interest, including from the Ferengi – who can pay handsomely for access to the Gamma Quadrant. The Bajorans, still wary of the Federation after their very lukewarm response decades earlier, would deny Starfleet access to the wormhole, preventing the Federation from exploring the Gamma Quadrant. Bajor wouldn’t be on a path to joining the Federation, and first contact with the Dominion might be made by the Bajorans… or even the Ferengi.

So that’s it!

Promo image for Star Trek TNG: A Final Unity showing a warbird.
A modified Romulan warbird.

We’ve considered five possible “what if” scenarios from the Star Trek franchise.

I hope this has been a bit of fun. I love writing, and I love Star Trek, so writing about Star Trek is a great way for me to spend a bit more time in this wonderful galaxy. I tried to get creative, picking on a few different storylines and ideas from across the franchise, and extrapolating what might plausibly be able to happen if things turned out differently. I hope that the sequences of events made sense, and that I arrived at conclusions that you feel are at least *possible* based on the changes I proposed!

In any case, this was just for fun, and an excuse to talk about Star Trek as the franchise’s milestone 60th anniversary year rolls along. I have a few ideas for later in the year, as we get closer to the anniversary date itself, so I hope you’ll stick around and join me for some of those. And in a few weeks’ time, I’ll be sharing my thoughts on the franchise’s latest outing: Starfleet Academy. Click or tap here to check out my review of the two-part premiere, if you missed it.

Until then… be sure to check back for more discussion of the Star Trek franchise. Live Long and Propser, friends!


All shows and films discussed above can be streamed on Paramount+ or purchased on DVD and/or Blu-ray. The Star Trek franchise (including all properties discussed above) is the copyright of Skydance/Paramount. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.

Star Trek “Hot Takes” (For The 60th Anniversary!)

A Star Trek-themed spoiler warning.

Spoiler Warning: Beware of spoilers for the following Star Trek productions: The Original Series, The Motion Picture, The Next Generation, Voyager, First Contact, Discovery, Picard, Prodigy, Strange New Worlds, and Starfleet Academy.

2026 will mark the 60th anniversary of the Star Trek franchise. And what better way to celebrate the beginning of this milestone year than by stirring the pot in the Trekkie community? So today, I thought we could all enjoy six more of my patented Star Trek “Hot Takes!”

Before we go any further, I’d like to give a couple of caveats. Firstly, these are all opinions that I genuinely hold, and I’m not making things up for the sake of clickbait or to deliberately upset people. But, with that being said, I’m also a huge Star Trek fan, and I share these “hot takes” with tongue firmly embedded in cheek! This is meant to be a bit of light-hearted fun in the 60th anniversary year – not something to get too worked up or annoyed about.

Promo screenshot for Star Trek Online showing a D'Kora Class ship.
A Ferengi marauder.

These are *hot* takes, not “super obvious takes that everyone will agree with,” so you can expect some degree of controversy! And, as always, everything we’re talking about is just one person’s *subjective, not objective* opinion. Feel free to disagree vehemently; I’m well aware that my position will be the minority one in most cases. However, if you aren’t in the right frame of mind for some potentially controversial Star Trek opinions… consider this your final content warning!

With all of that out of the way, let’s celebrate the beginning of Star Trek’s big sixtieth anniversary year with six “hot takes”!

“Hot Take” #1:
Star Trek got way better after Gene Roddenberry was out of the picture.

Promotional photo of Star Trek: The Next Generation creator Gene Roddenberry on set.
Gene Roddenberry.

Gene Roddenberry was Star Trek’s creator. He established the world, the lore, the look and feel of Star Trek… he quite literally built the franchise from nothing, and his philosophy and ideas are *still* a core part of Star Trek today. But after Roddenberry lost control of the cinematic franchise in the early ’80s, and especially after he stepped away from day-to-day work on The Next Generation, well… that’s where Star Trek got a heck of a lot better.

Gene Roddenberry cut his teeth on the TV serials of the mid ’50s, and his writing style… it never really evolved beyond that, even as the entertainment landscape around him was utterly transformed. Look at his final work with the original Star Trek crew: The Motion Picture, which he was heavily involved with, had a troubled production, with script re-writes happening during filming, and the finished story feels like an extended cut of a TOS episode. This came two years after Star Wars, a year after Superman, and the same year as Alien and Apocalypse Now. And although The Motion Picture made more than its money back, it’s not exactly the definitive Star Trek story for either Trekkies or a more general audience.

Behind-the-scenes photo from Star Trek: The Motion Picture showing director Robert Wise, creator Gene Roddenberry, William Shatner, DeForest Kelley, and Leonard Nimoy.
Roddenberry with Leonard Nimoy, director Robert Wise, DeForest Kelley, and William Shatner on the set of The Motion Picture.

The simple truth is that Roddenberry was lapped by a new generation of sci-fi storytellers and filmmakers in the years after Star Trek. And ironically, many of those projects would never have been greenlit were it not for the huge success of Star Trek! But by the end of the ’70s at the very latest, what Gene Roddenberry was capable of, particularly as a scriptwriter, had fallen way behind audience expectations. He tried to reclaim his place at the head of the Star Trek franchise with The Next Generation in 1987, but again… most of that show’s best episodes and stories came *after* he was no longer involved.

In The Original Series, Roddenberry penned the critically-panned episode The Omega Glory, his original treatment of The Cage almost got Star Trek cancelled before it could get off the ground, and of the other writing credits he has in the franchise… could you name a single one? Return of the Archons, Bread and Circuses, The Savage Curtain… none of these leap out at me as being “must-watch classics.”

Behind-the-scenes photo from the Star Trek TNG S3 episode Menage a Troi showing Gene Roddenberry and actor Peter Slutsker (in Ferengi makeup).
Gene Roddenberry with actor Peter Slutsker on the set of The Next Generation.

Roddenberry had a very rigid, almost dogmatic vision of what the future should look like. And, admirable as that may have been, it didn’t really lend itself to interesting, engaging, or realistic storytelling. If Starfleet characters and humans in this era are all heroic paragons of virtue, free of prejudices, conflicts, and negative feelings of any kind… how do you build tension and drama in a story? How can characters have arcs when they begin at “already perfect”? And the less we say about Roddenberry’s self-insert character of Wesley Crusher (named after his own middle name) the better!

Okay, okay. I’m exaggerating just a little. But I don’t think it’s a coincidence that The Original Series films were better-recieved after Roddenberry was kicked off them. Nor that The Next Generation began to improve after he was no longer directly involved. I personally *adore* The Motion Picture, but there’s no denying it’s not one of the best films in the franchise in most people’s opinions. Gene Roddenberry was simply a man of his time… and his time came and went. When The Next Generation was underway, and spin-offs were being worked on, Roddenberry’s time was over. And Star Trek improved as a result. Characters could be flawed, humanity and Starfleet could better reflect the world of today by being imperfect, and Star Trek began to feel less like an impossible utopia or a morality fable and more… real.

“Hot Take” #2:
The overuse of legacy characters did more harm than good in modern Star Trek.

Promo photo for Star Trek: Picard Season 3 showing the main characters.
(Most of) the main characters from The Next Generation returned in Picard Season 3.

In 2018, I was… concerned. For the second time in a decade, we were going to see Captain Pike and Spock re-cast for a new project: Discovery’s second season. And, around the same time, we also learned that Jean-Luc Picard was being brought back for his own series. Star Trek’s return to its small-screen home had already been complicated by including Michael Burnham as Spock’s long-lost adopted sibling, but these announcements seemed to signal a disturbing trend: Star Trek was doubling-down on legacy characters and storylines at the expense of trying something new.

And that trend would continue. Prodigy, despite being billed as a show for kids, functions more as a sequel to Voyager than an independent production. Picard quite literally dumped almost all of its new characters – without bothering to resolve most of their arcs and storylines – in order to bring back the crew of The Next Generation for one final adventure. And Strange New Worlds, despite introducing us to some interesting new characters, focuses excessively on Spock, Kirk, Uhura, Scotty, and other TOS characters that have been introduced. We even got an entire episode in Season 3 where it was *only* those legacy characters who were in focus.

Still frame from Star Trek SNW Season 3 showing Kirk and Scotty.
Kirk and Scotty in Strange New Worlds.

If I’m right, and Star Trek will be disappearing from the small screen for the foreseeable future in the next few years, I really think we’ll come to regret this overabundance of legacy characters. Why? Well, to put it simply: it’s left Star Trek with nothing to build on and nowhere to go in the future. You and I may love Janeway, Seven, Picard, Riker, Spock, Uhura, and more… but these stories have either been sequels, showing these characters firmly in retirement or at the ends of their careers, or prequels, bringing the characters from their younger selves closer to the people we remember. By the time these shows are all over… where’s the foundation Star Trek needs to build something new?

There are ways to include legacy characters without totally overwhelming or swamping a production. But it requires discipline on the production side of things. It needs someone to step in and say “no, we’ve seen enough of the Doctor or Uhura or Picard already, let’s tell a story that focuses on someone new.” It’s my hope that – however late in the day it may be – Starfleet Academy will strike a better balance in this regard that any of its predecessors have. It’ll be fun to catch up with the Doctor after all this time… but he doesn’t need to be a main character. He should be, as Robert Picardo has said, “the Yoda of Star Trek,” offering advice and help to this new cadre of cadets, but without getting in their way or making things all about himself.

Kate Mulgrew and Robert Picardo at the Starfleet Academy premiere in 2026.
Kate Mulgrew and Robert Picardo in January 2026.

Look at the absolutely awful mess that Star Wars has gotten itself into thanks to an inability to move on from legacy characters (and the only story that the franchise has ever told). Is that what we want for Star Trek? If Star Trek had gone down this kind of route in the ’80s and ’90s, sticking doggedly with Kirk and his crew, think of all the incredible characters we’d never have met, and all of the stories that would’ve never been told. Modern Star Trek, by focusing so heavily on legacy characters at the expense of new creations (and, arguably, because some of the few new creations haven’t been particularly well-written or well-received), has deprived the franchise of innovation for current audiences, failed to open the doorway to new audiences, and most importantly, stagnated the franchise and left it with fewer narrative directions in the future.

I can’t help but feel, as this current streaming era seems to be winding down, that modern Star Trek will come to be seen as a catastrophically mishandled period, and a massive missed opportunity to build a new, solid foundation for the future. In another twenty or thirty years, there won’t be able to be a revival of any of the modern shows, except perhaps for Lower Decks, because of how heavily they’ve all leaned on either returning actors or re-cast characters. There’s nowhere left for most of them to go now, and they’ve left Star Trek as a whole feeling kinda… tired.

“Hot Take” #3:
The Borg Queen ruins the Borg, and her inclusion fundamentally misunderstands the Collective and what made them such an intimidating villain.

(Cropped) still frame from Star Trek: First Contact showing the introduction of the Borg Queen.
The Borg Queen’s first appearance.

This is a subject I’ve touched on before – and it really ought to be a longer essay on its own, one day! For now, here’s the short version: the Borg Queen has always felt, to me, like the worst and most egregious kind of studio interference. “Films need to have villains!” decreed someone at Paramount Pictures in the mid ’90s, and because the Borg had already been decided upon for First Contact, the writers had to go out of their way to create a unique individual Borg character for Picard, Data, and the others to face off against. Even though the idea of a “unique individual Borg” is a complete oxymoron.

Think back to what Q told Picard when the Borg first appeared in Q Who: “They’re not interested in political conquest, wealth, or power as you know it. They’re simply interested in your ship, its technology. They’ve identified it as something they can consume.” That description presents the Borg as an adversary for the Federation unlike anything we’ve ever seen in the franchise before or since. And it’s *terrifying.*

Still frame from Star Trek: TNG showing Picard, Q, Geordi, and Worf in engineering.
Q Who introduced the Borg.

A common trope in Star Trek is “they were only trying to communicate!!1!” where we learn, belatedly, that a supposed enemy or alien monster wasn’t interested in harming our heroes, but that their form of life was so different that we interpreted their actions as aggression. Another trope of the franchise is our heroes using diplomacy and negotiation to defuse dangerous situations; talking down the Cardassians, Romulans, or Sheliak before a conflict can even break out. The Borg – prior to First Contact – completely ruled out all of that. They don’t talk, they don’t negotiate, they don’t want to be pals. They want to consume; to exploit technological and biological resources to add to their Collective. And you don’t get a say in that.

The Borg Queen opens up a channel to conversation and negotiation with the Borg, and was also a scenery-chewing bad guy in the mould of so many other villains of stage and screen, both in the Star Trek franchise and beyond. I’ll concede the point that the Borg Queen is one of Star Trek’s most memorable and iconic villains. But that’s not the issue. There didn’t need to be an individual Borg leader in order for the Collective to be so dangerous and threatening. Worse, the Queen actively detracts from the previously unique nature of the Borg, transforming them into just another enemy faction with an over-the-top leader.

Still frame from Star Trek: Picard Season 3 showing the defeat of the Borg Queen.
“Noooo!”

This got worse in Voyager, where the Queen developed a weird relationship with Janeway and, in particular, Seven of Nine. The Borg Queen is supposedly a manifestation of the Borg Collective itself, in control of literally trillions of drones, tens of thousands of starships, and the biggest interstellar empire in the galaxy. Yet, for some reason, she obsesses over Picard, Janeway, and Seven of Nine in a way that never felt plausible or realistic. It continued the trend of making villains in Star Trek simultaneously more bland and more over-the-top. And, of course, it all came to a head in Picard’s third season, where the finally-defeated Borg Queen even yells out “noooo!” as she’s beaten, as if she were a second-rate supervillain from a cheap comic book.

The Borg Collective worked because it held up a dark mirror to a society just beginning to get started with computers, showing us how an over-dependence on technology could go awry. It played on similar tropes to zombies, fears of Cold War-era “brainwashing,” and more. The idea that every hero lost turns into another enemy to fight is a powerful one, and the thought of losing one’s mind and being turned against one’s friends is truly a fate worse than death for a lot of folks. But what made the Borg work was that they were incomprehensible, unstoppable, and far beyond Starfleet in terms of size and technology. Adding a scenery-chewing bad guy at the behest of a studio executive? It took away all of those unique qualities, set the stage for a noticeable decline in the quality of Borg stories, and just… ruined the Borg.

“Hot Take” #4:
The transporter is more magic than sci-fi… which is why arguments about whether it “kills and copies” characters are kinda silly.

Concept art for Star Trek: Phase II/Star Trek: The Motion Picture showing a transporter room and two characters.
Concept art for Phase II showing the transporter.

Of *all* the fictional technologies in the Star Trek franchise, none have become quite as controversial as the transporter. There’s a raging debate about how the transporter works, what happens to people who get transported, and whether they’re the same person, clones, or something else entirely. Some folks are adamant that the transporter basically murders and then clones anyone who steps into it, arguing that, if the transporter were ever to be invented in the real world, our current understanding of physics and atomic particles means that the person who steps out the other side of a transporter beam is basically a clone.

But here’s the thing: the transporter is probably the least-realistic of any of the major technologies we know of in Star Trek. There are proposals for faster-than-light communication via quantum entanglement. There are concepts for actual warp drive and other faster-than-light engines. There are realistic artificial gravity ideas that seem feasible. But a transporter? It’s basically magic wrapped in technobabble. That technobabble makes it *feel* technological rather than magical, but it’s the least-plausible of all Star Trek technologies. And for me, it’s one of those “you just gotta suspend your disbelief” things.

Still frame from Star Trek TOS Season 2 showing characters mid-transport.
Transporting in The Original Series.

We don’t apply the same rigorous real-world quantum physics analyses to things like warp drive, do we? Not at the same rate, anyway, based on my engagement with the fan community. Yet, if you approach faster-than-light travel the same way as some pseudo-scientists and armchair physicists do the transporter, you pretty quickly find that it’s impossible, too. My point is this: Star Trek is science-*fiction*, and, as in all works of fiction, there comes a moment where you can either… go with a story and suspend your disbelief, or you can’t. Lots of things in Star Trek are totally fictional. Klingons. Phasers. Dilithium Crystals. And while I get the argument that we want the world of Star Trek to make sense, it’s more important to me that it remains consistent with itself, not that it has to conform to our current understanding of real-world science in every instance.

If Star Trek was constrained by real-world science all the time, that wouldn’t just affect the transporter! Starships at warp would have to deal with time dilation as they travelled faster than the speed of light. Energy weapons would be basically invisible. Starship battles would look a heck of a lot different, too. Can you imagine, in the Battle of the Mutara Nebula, if we had to sit in the cinema for eight weeks while the Enterprise’s torpedo slowly made its way, at sub-light speeds, towards the Reliant? That wouldn’t be a lot of fun, right?

Still frame from Star Trek: TNG showing Barclay being transported.
Lt. Barclay mid-transport.

There is a sub-genre of “hard” sci-fi, where real science matters a lot more than it does in Star Trek. And I daresay it’s true that you’d either never get a technology like the transporter there, or if you did, it’d be treated as some kind of existential horror. But Star Trek isn’t that kind of franchise, despite what some Trekkies like to think, and if we want to enjoy Star Trek episodes and stories on their own merit, we kinda have to accept some scientific inaccuracies and some of the franchise’s more magical and fantastical elements. The transporter is one such example.

I will say, though, that I totally get this argument, and when it’s made in a less-than-serious way, I don’t *object* to it, nor to having a discussion around it. But if someone’s gonna try to claim that it “ruins” Star Trek, or that the franchise needs to explain, in-universe, how the transporter works in detail, then that’s something I’m just flat-out not interested in. Most of Star Trek’s technologies benefit from a degree of vagueness, and the transporter is one of them. It can adapt to fit the needs of all manner of stories, and while there may be implications to the technology based on our current understanding of sub-atomic particles and physics… well, who’s to say that those implications won’t be overcome or proven wrong in the next few centuries? All it takes is a little bit of creative thinking to accept that the transporter works in exactly the way we see it work in episode after episode!

“Hot Take” #5:
Most pitches for new Star Trek shows from ex-actors (and a lot of fantasy proposals from fans, too) would be just *awful*.

Still frame from Star Trek: Enterprise Season 4 showing Archer and T'Pol.
President Archer, anyone?

Scott Bakula has been doing the rounds recently with his proposal for a “Star Trek: President Archer” series; a kind of sequel to Enterprise focusing on the early years of the Federation with Archer as its leader. Robert Duncan McNeill unironically pitched a Captain Proton show a few years ago. Michael Dorn spent years trying to convince CBS and Paramount to go for his “Captain Worf” idea. And those are just a handful of ideas for new shows, sequels, or spin-offs that I just… I really think wouldn’t be much fun.

Picard demonstrated that there can be a place for sequels in Star Trek – though it did so *very* imperfectly a lot of the time. But as we were just saying, modern Star Trek already relies excessively on legacy characters, so doing *more* Picard-type shows, focusing on characters like Seven, Janeway, Worf, or Archer… I think it’s just too much, especially right now. And without a hook nor a compelling reason for *why* any of these characters need to return, I think they’d struggle to tell engaging and interesting stories that would really justify bringing them back.

Still frame from Star Trek: Voyager Season 5 showing Captain Proton (Tom Paris), the Doctor, and Harry Kim in a black-and-white holo programme.
A Captain Proton series? Really?

On the one hand, I get it. If you’re… well, to be honest, *most* ex-Star Trek actors, returning to the franchise is the best work you’re gonna get this decade – if not ever. And when the former ViacomCBS and Paramount corporations seemed to have been greenlighting Trek projects all across the board, you’ve basically got nothing to lose by putting a pitch together. But I think what Star Trek needs right now is to move on, to genuinely leave the past in the past. If there’s even a remote chance of a new series anytime soon, it should be set further along the timeline, in a new era, with new characters. Modern Trek has already overdone it with the legacy characters, in my opinion.

But that’s somewhat incidental. The blunt reality is that I don’t think I’ve seen a single one of these pitches that I actually liked, or that I felt had even the remotest justification for being created. Take Kate Mulgrew’s Janeway idea as an example. Between Voyager, Prodigy, and references to her in Picard, we’ve seen her entire arc… and then some. What could a hypothetical “Star Trek: Janeway” do for the character that we haven’t already seen? It would be a sequel for the sake of making a sequel… worse, it would be a sequel for the sake of cutting Kate Mulgrew a cheque.

Still frame from Star Trek: Prodigy's premiere showing holo-Janeway.
A holographic version of Captain Janeway from Prodigy.

I’m loathe to give studio executives *any* credit whatsoever – especially the brain-dead hacks who used to run the old ViacomCBS and Paramount corporations. But if there’s one thing I could say in defence of some of these folks, it’s that they recognised the obvious lack of quality (and lack of broader audience appeal) in these kinds of actor-led pitches and proposals. There’s an alternate timeline, perhaps, where the Star Trek franchise is swamped by a succession of disappointing sequel shows centred around one or two returning characters… and I just don’t see how any of that would be an improvement.

I’d also extend this to a whole lot of fan-made proposals and “fantasy” Star Trek shows, too – probably including some of my own! I’d have loved to see, for example, a series set aboard a hospital ship; ER in space. But let’s be honest, hardly anyone would be interested in that! There’s no shortage of ideas and proposals from fans for new Star Trek shows, sequels, and spin-offs, and while I will occasionally come across one that sounds genuinely interesting… most of them are absolute trash, and would be truly awful if they ever made it to the screen. This isn’t to say that the Star Trek franchise has got everything right in recent years – far from it. Look at the repetitiveness of Discovery’s storytelling as the show wore on, the bizarre decision to commission a Section 31 show, then re-work it into a TV movie, or making a half-kids show, half-sequel to a series from a quarter of a century earlier. But just because the folks in charge of Star Trek have made mistakes, that doesn’t magically make some of these truly awful-sounding pitches any better!

“Hot Take” #6:
Star Trek is, at a fundamental level, not the right fit for a serialised streaming TV show.

Behind-the-scenes photo from Star Trek: Picard showing Patrick Stewart and a camera.
Behind-the-scenes on Picard Season 2.

Since Lost premiered in the mid 2000s, and especially after Game of Thrones took the world by storm, most big-budget TV shows have gone down a serialised route, mandated by broadcasters and streaming platforms. And there have been some wonderful success stories with the serialised format… in other franchises. But when you think about what Star Trek is at its core – a franchise about exploring strange new worlds – that just doesn’t gel with the kind of serialised storytelling that has become the norm on streaming. And I think that’s a big part of why modern Star Trek has struggled.

A typical Star Trek series needs the freedom that only episodic storytelling can provide. It needs to be able to warp to a new planet every week, encounter new aliens, new villains, and new temporary allies. There can be character arcs and growth within that format – I’m not suggesting we go back to the days where something huge or traumatic would happen, only for it to be ignored in every subsequent story. But in terms of what Starfleet is and what almost all of our main characters do for a living… the only way to tell these kinds of stories, really, is to use that older, episodic style.

Still frame from Star Trek: The Next Generation showing the Enterprise-D at DS9.
The Enterprise-D at DS9.

The only series where serialised storytelling had a chance of working was Deep Space Nine. A static setting with a large cast of secondary characters gave the franchise that opportunity. And I’m not averse to the idea of doing something like that again – DS9 is, on balance, probably my favourite series, and I’d like to see another Star Trek show set on a space station or even a colony. Both of those settings offer more potential for serialised storytelling.

But a show like Discovery, set on a vessel of exploration, needed the freedom of an episodic format to really shine. There were a few semi-standalone episodes across Discovery’s run, and I think most of them would probably rank as my personal favourites that the show produced. But for me, Discovery’s format – which was later recycled in Picard and even Prodigy – felt more like a constraint than an advantage. Blindly chasing the latest trend did not benefit any of the Star Trek shows that tried it, and it’s no coincidence that Strange New Worlds – which employs much more of an episodic style – is, in my view, far and away the best part of modern Star Trek.

Still frame from Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 3x09 showing the USS Enterprise.
The Enterprise in Strange New Worlds.

Unfortunately, Starfleet Academy seems poised to repeat the mistakes made by Discovery, Picard, and Prodigy – telling a season-long, fully-serialised story with a “huge galactic threat,” a villain with a mysterious connection to a main character, and so on. It’s my sincere hope that, if and when Star Trek is revived on the small screen one day, we’ll get something closer to Strange New Worlds in terms of the kind of storytelling employed. Most Star Trek shows just aren’t a good fit for these kinds of serialised stories. And that’s before we get into how repetitive it is to have existential threats, scenery-chewing villains, and the like every single time.

Star Trek has *always* taken inspiration from the entertainment landscape around it, and that’s not inherently a bad thing. But in this case, the way streaming TV has gone over the past fifteen years or so has taken it in a direction that doesn’t suit the Star Trek franchise, and I wish the higher-ups had recognised that sooner. There’s scope to tell *some* serialised stories in Star Trek – I’m not saying it should never be attempted. But doing so at the expense of episodic storytelling in almost every case is why, for a lot of folks, the modern franchise hasn’t “felt like Star Trek.”

So that’s it… for now!

Still frame from Star Trek IV showing Kirk and Spock on a bus.
Kirk and Spock in 1986…

We’ve talked about six of my “hot takes” to mark the beginning of the 60th anniversary year – but there’s more to come! Starfleet Academy will premiere later this week (for some reason, Paramount-Skydance didn’t invite me to the premiere nor give me the episodes to watch early; wonder why?) My current plan for Starfleet Academy is to write a review of the two-episode premiere, then write a review of Season 1 as a whole after it concludes in early March. I don’t think I have enough in the tank for weekly episode reviews right now, I’m afraid, but I hope you’ll join me as I check out the premiere, at least.

And as we get closer to the anniversary, I’ve got a couple of ideas for episode re-watches and other pieces to celebrate this impressive milestone. I’m not 100% sure if Strange New Worlds Season 4 will be out this year, but if it is, I daresay I’ll be reviewing those episodes, too. And I’m always on the hunt for more Star Trek topics to write about, especially in an important year like this. So definitely check back!

Until then, I hope this has been a bit of fun – and not something to get too worked up or upset about! I enjoyed writing up these “hot takes,” and I hope you’ll take them in the spirit of good-natured fun as we come together to celebrate what makes Star Trek such a great franchise. See you… out there!


Most Star Trek films and TV programmes can be streamed on Paramount+ in countries and territories where the platform is available, and are also available on DVD and/or Blu-ray. The Star Trek franchise – including everything discussed above – is the copyright of Skydance/Paramount. This article contains the thoughts and opinions of one person only and is not intended to cause any offence.